Solar Battery Charger Maintains High Efficiency in Low Light J. Celani An important characteristic of any solar panel is that it achieves peak power output at a relatively constant operating voltage (VMP) regardless of illumination level (see Figure 1). The LT3652 2A battery charger exploits this characteristic to maintain a solar panel at peak operating efficiency by implementing input voltage regulation (patent pending). When available solar power is inadequate to meet the power requirements of an LT3652 battery charger, input voltage regulation reduces the battery charge current. This reduces the load on the solar panel to maintain the panel voltage at VMP, maximizing the panel output power. This method of achieving peak panel efficiency is called maximum power point control (MPPC). While MPPC optimizes solar panel efficiency during periods of low illumination, the power conversion efficiency of the battery charger suffers when power levels are low, degrading the overall power transfer efficiency from the panel to the battery. This article shows how to improve battery charger efficiency by applying a simple PWM charging technique that forces the battery charger to release energy in bursts when power levels are low. USING THE CURRENT MONITOR STATUS PIN TO INDICATE LOW POWER CONDITIONS The CHRG current monitor status pin on the LT3652 indicates the state of battery charge current, and is used here to control the PWM function. The pin is pulled low when the charger output current is greater than C/10, or 1/10 of the programmed maximum current, and high impedance when the output current is below C/10. INCREASING ILLUMINATION IPANEL (A) PPANEL (W) P VS V VPANEL (V) Figure 1. A solar panel produces maximum power at a particular output voltage, VMP, which is relatively independent of illumination level. The LT3652 2A battery charger maximizes the output power of a solar panel by regulating the input panel voltage at VMP. solar panel voltage that is higher than the input regulation voltage (VIN(REG)). The solar panel voltage climbs through the UVLO hysteresis range in response to the charger being disabled until the UVLO rising threshold is achieved, when the charger is re-enabled at full power. The charger then provides charge current until During periods of low illumination, the input regulation loop can reduce the output current of the charger to below C/10, causing the CHRG pin to become high impedance. This status pin changeof-state is used to disable the IC by triggering an input undervoltage lockout (UVLO) with the falling threshold at a SOLAR PANEL INPUT ~25V OC VOLTAGE VMP = 17V D2 D1 R4 536k C1 390µF R6 1M VIN VIN_REG SHDN R5 100k SW LT3652 BAT VFB GND C4 0.68µF M1 RSENSE 0.05Ω R1 280k NTC CHRG TIMER L1 10µH SENSE FAULT R7 63.4k D3 1µF BOOST R8 1M PWM COMPONENTS Figure 2. 17V VMP solar panel to 3-cell Li-ion (12.6V) 2A charger 24 | October 2013 : LT Journal of Analog Innovation VMP I VS V R3 174k R2 100k D1,D2: CMSH3-40MA D3: CMPSH1-4 L1: IHLP-2525CZ-11 M1: BSS123 C2 10µF + 3-CELL Li-ION design ideas While MPPC optimizes solar panel efficiency during periods of low illumination, the power conversion efficiency of the battery charger suffers when power levels are low. This article shows how to improve battery charger efficiency by applying a simple PWM charging technique that forces the battery charger to release energy in bursts at low power levels. 100 TA = 25°C CHARGER CONVERSION EFFICIENCY (%) INPUT REGULATION VOLTAGE (V) 22 20 18 100% TO 98% PEAK POWER 16 98% TO 95% PEAK POWER 14 12 10 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 CHARGER OUTPUT CURRENT (A) 2 PWM CIRCUIT ENABLED 80 VIN 5V/DIV 60 40 20 VCHRG 10V/DIV WITHOUT PWM CIRCUIT VBAT = 12V 1 10 100 ICHARGE (mA) 1k 10k 5ms/DIV Figure 3. Typical “12V system” (VMP = 17V) solar panel efficiency Figure 4. Efficiency for the circuit in Figure 2 Figure 5. Waveform of VIN during PWM for the circuit in Figure 2 input voltage regulation again disables the charger. This cycle repeats, generating a charger output that is a series of high current bursts, which maximizes the efficiency of the charger as well as the efficiency of the entire solar charger system at any illumination level. The LT3652’s CHRG pin is pulled low while required charge current exceeds 1/10 of the 2A programmed maximum charge current, or 200m A. When charge current is reduced by the input regulation loop below the 200m A level, the CHRG pin becomes high impedance, which allows the gate of M1 to be pulled up to VBAT, enabling the FET, M1. This FET pulls R7 to ground, engaging an input voltage UVLO function using the SHDN pin and the resistor divider made from R6 and R7. The UVLO function is programmed with that divider to have a falling threshold of 18V and a rising threshold of 20V. The falling threshold is the critical design value, and must be programmed to a voltage that is higher than the input regulation voltage, and is 10% lower than the rising threshold, as is dictated by the LT3652 shutdown threshold hysteresis. charge current, the LT3652’s input voltage regulation reduces the output charge current until the charger input power is equivalent to the available power provided by the panel. With input regulation active, the panel voltage at VIN is held at the programmed 17V peak power voltage, maximizing the power produced from the panel. If the panel illumination becomes low enough that the available panel power corresponds to charge current less than 200m A, the CHRG pin becomes high impedance and the UVLO function is enabled via M1, R6 and R7. HIGH EFFICIENCY LI-ION CHARGER Figure 2 shows a solar panel to 3-cell Li-Ion charger with low power PWM functionality. This charger employs a 17V input regulation voltage (a common VMP for “12V system” panels), programmed using the resistor divider R4 and R5 at the VIN_REG pin. Keeping the operating voltage of a typical 12V system solar panel near its 17V rated VMP voltage yields panel efficiencies close to 100%, as shown in Figure 3. The low power PWM function is implemented using M1, R6, R7 and R8. Figure 4 shows that the addition of the PWM circuitry significantly increases efficiency at battery charge currents below 200m A. During low illumination conditions, when available panel power is insufficient for the LT3652 to provide required Since VIN is at 17V, which is lower than the UVLO falling threshold, the LT3652 shuts down, disabling all of the battery charging functions. With the battery charger disabled, virtually all of the panel output current charges the input capacitor (C1), increasing the voltage at VIN until the 20V UVLO rising threshold is achieved, reenabling the LT3652. The battery charger is re-enabled with VIN well above the October 2013 : LT Journal of Analog Innovation | 25 D2 D1 R4 536k C1 390µF VIN R6 1M LT3652 VIN_REG SHDN R5 100k SW D3 1µF L1 10µH BOOST RSENSE 0.05Ω SENSE FAULT BAT R1 309k NTC CHRG VFB TIMER GND R3 174k C2 10µF R2 100k 100 + 6-CELL LEAD ACID C4 4.7µF R7 63.4k M1 R8 1M D5 C5 4.7µF PWM COMPONENTS D4 R9 1M D1,D2: CMSH3-40MA D3: CMPSH1-4 D4,D5: 1N914 L1: IHLP-2525CZ-11 M1: BSS123 FLOAT COMPONENTS Figure 6. 17V VMP panel to 6-cell 2A lead-acid charger 17V input regulation threshold, so full charge current flows into the battery. The CHRG status pin is pulled low in response to the high battery charge current level, which disables the UVLO function. As long as the power required by the battery charger remains less than that available from the solar panel, the panel voltage will collapse until VIN is reduced to 17V, when the battery charge current is reduced by input regulation to maintain that voltage. When the charge current is again reduced to 200m A, the CHRG pin becomes high impedance, the UVLO circuit is reengaged, and the disable/enable cycle repeats, resulting in a string of charge current ‘bursts’ that average to the battery charge current corresponding to the available power from the solar panel. Figure 5 shows the PWM operation of the circuit in Figure 2. While the LT3652 is disabled, the voltage on VIN ramps from the input regulation threshold of 17V to the shutdown threshold of 20V. The voltage on the LT3652 CHRG pin is low while the charger is enabled and high while the charger is disabled. While the charger is disabled, the panel energy is stored in the input capacitor, so the output power from the panel remains continuous. The 26 | October 2013 : LT Journal of Analog Innovation CHARGER CONVERSION EFFICIENCY (%) SOLAR PANEL INPUT ~25V OC VOLTAGE VMP = 17V PWM CIRCUIT ENABLED 80 60 WITHOUT PWM CIRCUIT 40 20 VBAT = 13V 1 10 100 ICHARGE (mA) 1k 10k Figure 7. Efficiency curve for circuit in Figure 6 efficiency of the solar panel corresponds to the average voltage on the panel during PWM operation, which is about 18.5V. HIGH EFFICIENCY LEAD-ACID CHARGER Figure 6 shows a 6-cell lead-acid battery charger with low current PWM functionality. The battery charger is designed for a solar panel that has similar characteristics to that used for the charger in Figure 2. This lead-acid charger performs a 3-stage lead-acid charging profile, employing 2A bulk mode charging, absorption mode charging to 14.4V, and float charge maintenance at 13.5V. The battery charger provides up to 2A while charging with CC/CV characteristics up to the absorption mode regulation voltage of 14.4V, provided there is ample input power available from the solar panel. As the battery nears the 14.4V regulation voltage, charge current is reduced, completing absorption mode charging when the charge current falls to 200m A, or 1/10 the maximum charge current (C/10). When absorption mode charging is completed, the CHRG pin becomes high impedance in response to achieving the C/10 charge current threshold, and float mode maintenance charging begins. The regulation voltage is reduced from 14.4V to 13.5V in float mode, achieved by effectively removing R9 from the VFB summing node—accomplished by a diodeOR circuit (D4 and D5) when CHRG is pulled high by R8, via the reverse-biased D4. Float mode charging regulation is also implemented if the LT3652 charger experiences inadequate input power due to low solar panel illumination levels. If charge current is reduced to less than 200m A via input regulation and PWM operation begins, the CHRG pin voltage becomes a pulsed waveform. D5 and C5 implement a peak-detect filter that maintains a continuous reverse-bias on D4, keeping the charger in float mode (VCHARGE = 13.5V) during PWM operation. Figure 7 shows that the addition of the PWM circuitry significantly increases efficiency at battery charge currents below 200m A. During PWM operation, the input voltage ramps from the input regulation threshold of 17V to the shutdown threshold of 20V during the period the IC is disabled, as previously described for the battery charger in Figure 2. The output power from the solar panel corresponds to the design ideas SOLAR PANEL INPUT ~25V OC VOLTAGE VMP = 17V D2 D1 R4 1M C1 390µF VIN R6 1M VIN_REG SHDN R5 215k SW LT3652 FAULT R7 73.2k C6 4.7µF R10 1.2M M1 R8 1M TIMER D7 VMP REDUCTION COMPONENTS PWM COMPONENTS L1 10µH RSENSE 0.05Ω SENSE BAT R1 309k NTC CHRG D6 D3 1µF BOOST VFB GND R3 174k C2 10µF R2 100k + 6-CELL LEAD ACID C4 4.7µF D5 C5 4.7µF D4 R9 1M FLOAT COMPONENTS D1,D2: CMSH3-40MA D3: CMPSH1-4 D4–D7: 1N914 L1: IHLP-2525CZ-11 M1: BSS123 Figure 8. 17V VMP panel to 6-cell 2A lead-acid charger with low current VMP tracking average voltage of the panel, or about 18.5V. Figure 3 shows that this voltage is within the optimum operational range for higher output currents, but is above that range at currents less than 200m A. To maximize both solar panel output efficiency and battery charger efficiency in applications with extended low light operation, the VIN(REG) and UVLO voltages should be reduced during the burst period. A method to do so is described below. HIGH EFFICIENCY LEAD-ACID CHARGER WITH LOW CURRENT V MP TRACKING The LT3652 lead-acid battery charger in Figure 8 is similar to the battery charger in Figure 6, but also lowers the input regulation voltage (VIN(REG)) while the charge current is below 200m A. This improves panel efficiency by tracking the panel’s characteristic reduction in VMP at low currents. Low current VMP tracking is implemented by adding R10 to the input regulation divider of R4 and R5. R10 is connected to the input regulation summing node through a diode-OR circuit (D6 and D7). When the CHRG pin voltage is high, R10 is effectively removed from the summing node via the reverse-biased D7, lowering VIN(REG) from 17V to 15V. If the charger experiences inadequate input power due to low illumination levels, charge current is reduced via the input regulation loop to maintain the VMP solar panel voltage of 17V. If charge current is reduced to less than 200m A, the charger begins PWM operation and the regulation threshold is reduced for float charging, as in the previous lead-acid battery charger circuit. Additionally, this charger reduces VIN(REG) to 15V, tracking the reduction of the solar panel VMP at low currents. D6 and C6 implement a peak-detect filter, similar to the previously described D5 and C5. This filter maintains a continuous reverse-bias on D7, keeping the charger input regulation voltage at the 15V low illumination level during PWM operation. The PWM control components (M1 and R6-R8) implement UVLO thresholds of 16V (falling) and 17.5V (rising). During PWM operation, the panel voltage at VIN ramps from the 15V input regulation voltage to the 17.5V UVLO rising threshold, yielding an average panel voltage of about 16.25V. This charger maximizes both charger conversion efficiency and solar panel output power efficiency by reducing the operational panel voltage while implementing PWM operation during periods of low illumination. CONCLUSION The LT3652 battery charger IC features a patent pending input voltage regulation circuit that is used to maintain a solar panel at its maximum power voltage, VMP. While the power output efficiency of a solar panel is optimized using this technique, the efficiency of the battery charger drops at low output currents. The efficiency of a LT3652 solar-powered battery charger can be greatly improved during low illumination conditions with a simple PWM technique, implemented using only a few external components, maximizing the operational efficiency of both the charger and the solar panel. n October 2013 : LT Journal of Analog Innovation | 27