AN291: Output Buffer Options for Si5xx XO/VCXO Devices

Si53 X /55 X /57 X / 5 9 X
1. Introduction
The Si53x/55x/57x/59x XO/VCXO devices can be ordered with one of four different output buffer types: CMOS,
LVPECL, LVDS, or CML. Each output type has its own particular benefits and disadvantages. This document
describes each buffer type, proper biasing and termination schemes, and related technical trade-offs.
Complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) outputs are typically chosen for the lowest output frequencies
(below 160 MHz) because they do not offer constant, controlled output impedance. Without controlled output
impedance, the length of the connected transmission line must be limited. The general rule is that if the line length
approaches 1/4th the wavelength of the highest harmonic frequency, that line should be treated as a transmission
line. CMOS can be ordered for all three of the supported supply levels (1.8, 2.5, and 3.3 V). Silicon Laboratories
XOs and VCXOs support a nominal CMOS output voltage swing from ground to VDD. CMOS is compatible with
Low-voltage positive emitter-coupled logic (LVPECL) differential outputs are typically chosen for their compatibility
with other high-speed ICs. This output type requires external biasing and proper termination of 50  to VDD minus
2 V for each side of the differential output. Many well-known LVPECL biasing and termination schemes are
supported by the Si53x/55x/57x/59x devices. The most common are shown in Figures 1, 2, and 3. The primary
disadvantages of this output format are increased power consumption (due to the 28 mA required for dc biasing)
and incompatibility with 1.8 V supplies. The primary advantage of the LVPECL signal format is jitter performance.
LVPECL provides the best jitter performance because of its large swing.
The Si53x/55x/57x/59x LVPECL driver is a CMOS instantiation that does not present a low output impedance
similar to a traditional bipolar LVPECL driver. Therefore, we do not recommend termination approaches such as
STECL (Source Terminated ECL) that do not use load terminations. If such an approach is required, contact the
50 
50 
V DD – 2 V
Figure 1. Traditional Biasing and Termination for LVPECL Output Buffers
0.1 µF
0.1 µF
130 
100 
130 
Figure 2. First Alternative Biasing and Termination for LVPECL Output Buffers
(100  Line Termination May Be Internal to the Receiving IC)
Rev. 0.3 8/09
Copyright © 2009 by Silicon Laboratories
130 
130 
82 
82 
Figure 3. Second Alternative Biasing and Termination for LVPECL Output Buffers
Low-voltage differential signaling (LVDS) differential outputs are typically chosen for newer designs because of
their ease of implementation in CMOS ICs and because of their ease of use at the system level. LVDS outputs
require no external biasing or termination when connected to LVDS inputs and are very power-efficient. Also, the
LVDS specification allows for significant dc biasing drift from transmitter to receiver, further simplifying system-level
design. The primary disadvantages of this output are reduced jitter performance when compared to LVPECL. The
primary advantage is ease of use. LVDS outputs are connected as shown in Figure 4.
100 
Figure 4. Typical Transmission Line Connection for LVDS
(100  Line Termination May be Internal to the Receiving IC)
5. CML
Typically, current-mode logic (CML) differential outputs are chosen when LVPECL outputs are desired but lower
power consumption is required. CML provides similar performance to LVPECL but does not require external
biasing. CML outputs must be ac-coupled since they cannot provide sufficient current to bias other devices. CML
outputs are connected as shown in Figures 5 and 6.
0.1 µF
100 
0.1 µF
Figure 5. Typical CML Output Buffer Connection
(100  Line Termination may be Internal to the Receiving IC)
0.1 µF
0.1 µF
50 
50 
Figure 6. Alternative CML Output Buffer Connection
Rev. 0.3
6. Relative Comparison
Figure 7 shows a relative comparison between jitter performance and power consumed. Generally, better
performance requires more power.
Relative Performance
vs. Power Consumption
Jitter Performance
Power Consumption
Figure 7. Relationship of Jitter Performance to Power Consumption
7. Conclusion
Because of the flexibility of Silicon Laboratories’ XO/VCXO products, it is important that the system designer
understand the benefits and trade-offs associated with common output buffer types so that the best output lock
signal format can be chosen to optimize each design at the application level. LVPECL offers the best jitter
performance followed by CML, LVDS, and finally CMOS. Choose LVPECL for applications where jitter is the
primary concern. Power consumption is optimized by choosing CML or LVDS when appropriate. Other trade-offs
may exist; so, if you are unsure which output buffer type to choose, please contact Silicon Laboratories directly at
[email protected]
Rev. 0.3
Revision 0.2 to Revision 0.3
Added Si59x part number.
Rev. 0.3
Rev. 0.3
ClockBuilder Pro
One-click access to Timing tools,
documentation, software, source
code libraries & more. Available for
Windows and iOS (CBGo only).
Timing Portfolio
Support and Community
Silicon Laboratories intends to provide customers with the latest, accurate, and in-depth documentation of all peripherals and modules available for system and software implementers
using or intending to use the Silicon Laboratories products. Characterization data, available modules and peripherals, memory sizes and memory addresses refer to each specific
device, and "Typical" parameters provided can and do vary in different applications. Application examples described herein are for illustrative purposes only. Silicon Laboratories
reserves the right to make changes without further notice and limitation to product information, specifications, and descriptions herein, and does not give warranties as to the accuracy
or completeness of the included information. Silicon Laboratories shall have no liability for the consequences of use of the information supplied herein. This document does not imply
or express copyright licenses granted hereunder to design or fabricate any integrated circuits. The products must not be used within any Life Support System without the specific
written consent of Silicon Laboratories. A "Life Support System" is any product or system intended to support or sustain life and/or health, which, if it fails, can be reasonably expected
to result in significant personal injury or death. Silicon Laboratories products are generally not intended for military applications. Silicon Laboratories products shall under no
circumstances be used in weapons of mass destruction including (but not limited to) nuclear, biological or chemical weapons, or missiles capable of delivering such weapons.
Trademark Information
Silicon Laboratories Inc., Silicon Laboratories, Silicon Labs, SiLabs and the Silicon Labs logo, CMEMS®, EFM, EFM32, EFR, Energy Micro, Energy Micro logo and combinations
thereof, "the world’s most energy friendly microcontrollers", Ember®, EZLink®, EZMac®, EZRadio®, EZRadioPRO®, DSPLL®, ISOmodem ®, Precision32®, ProSLIC®, SiPHY®,
USBXpress® and others are trademarks or registered trademarks of Silicon Laboratories Inc. ARM, CORTEX, Cortex-M3 and THUMB are trademarks or registered trademarks of
ARM Holdings. Keil is a registered trademark of ARM Limited. All other products or brand names mentioned herein are trademarks of their respective holders.
Silicon Laboratories Inc.
400 West Cesar Chavez
Austin, TX 78701
Similar pages