General Business Use AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) Atmel makes no warranty for the use of its products, other than those expressly contained in the Company’s standard warranty which is detailed in Atmel’s Terms and Conditions located on the Company’s web site. The Company assumes no responsibility for any errors which may appear in this document, reserves the right to change devices or specifications detailed herein at any time without notice, and does not make any commitment to update the information contained herein. No licenses to patents or other intellectual property of Atmel are granted by the Company in connection with the sale of Atmel products, expressly or by implication. Atmel’s products are not authorized for use as critical components in life support devices or systems. The security of any system in which the product is used will depend on the system’s security as a whole. Where security or cryptography features are mentioned in this document this refers to features which are intended to increase the security of the product under normal use and in normal circumstances. All products are sold subject to Atmel’s Terms & Conditions of Supply and the provisions of any agreements made between Atmel and the Customer. In ordering a product covered by this document the Customer agrees to be bound by those Terms & Conditions and agreements and nothing contained in this document constitutes or forms part of a contract (with the exception of the contents of this Notice). A copy of Atmel’s Terms & Conditions of Supply is available on request. Atmel Corporation 2004 Contents Section 1 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite .......................................................... 9 1.1 Identification................................................................................................. 9 1.2 Overview ...................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Common Criteria Conformance Claim ....................................................... 10 1.4 Document Objective .................................................................................. 10 1.5 Document Structure ................................................................................... 10 1.6 Scope and Terminology ............................................................................. 11 1.7 References ................................................................................................ 11 1.8 Revision History ......................................................................................... 12 Section 2 Target of Evaluation Description................................................................ 13 2.1 Product Type ............................................................................................. 13 2.2 Smartcard Product Life-cycle..................................................................... 15 2.3 TOE Environment ...................................................................................... 17 2.4 TOE Logical Phases .................................................................................. 18 2.5 TOE Intended Usage ................................................................................. 19 2.6 General IT Features of the TOE ................................................................ 21 Section 3 TOE Security Environment ........................................................................ 23 3.1 Assets ........................................................................................................ 23 3.2 Assumptions .............................................................................................. 23 3.3 Threats....................................................................................................... 26 3.4 Organizational Security Policies ................................................................ 30 Section 4 Security Objectives .................................................................................... 31 4.1 Security Objectives for the TOE................................................................. 31 4.2 Security Objectives for the Environment.................................................... 34 TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 3 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite Section 5 TOE Security Functional Requirements .................................................... 39 5.1 Functional Requirements Applicable to Phase 3 Only (Testing Phase) ......................................................................................... 39 5.2 Functional Requirements Applicable to Phases 3 to 7 .............................. 41 5.3 TOE Security Assurance Requirements .................................................... 47 Section 6 TOE Summary Specification...................................................................... 51 6.1 TOE Security Functions ............................................................................. 51 6.2 TOE Assurance Measures ......................................................................... 57 Section 7 Protection Profile Claims ........................................................................... 61 7.1 Protection Profile Reference ...................................................................... 61 7.2 Protection Profile Refinements .................................................................. 61 7.3 Protection Profile Additions........................................................................ 61 Appendix A 4 of 64 Glossary..................................................................................................... 62 General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) Figures Figure 2-1 TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) Smartcard Product Life Cycle ........................................................................... 16 General Business Use 5 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 6 of 64 General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) Tables Table 2-1 Smartcard Product Life-cycle ...................................................................... 15 Table 2-2 Phases 4 to 7 Product Users ...................................................................... 20 Table 3-1 Threats and Phases .................................................................................... 29 Table 5-1 IFCSF-Policy ............................................................................................... 45 Table 6-1 Relationship Between Security Requirements and Security Functions ...... 56 Table 6-2 Relationship Between Assurance Requirements and Measures ................ 59 TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 7 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 8 of 64 General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) Section 1 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 1.1 Identification 1 Title: AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite [ST_Lite] 2 This Security Target Lite has been constructed with Common Criteria (CC) Version 2.1. 1.2 Overview 3 This Security Target Lite [ST_Lite] is for a microcontroller (MCU) device with security features. The device is a member of a family of single chip MCU devices which are intended for use within Smartcard products. The family codename is AVR ASL4 and the ‘parent’ device of the family, from which other family members will be derived, is the AT90SC19264RC. 4 The AT90SC6404RT MCU device (AT58810) is being evaluated against the CC Smartcard Integrated Circuit Protection Profile PP/9806 to Evaluation Assurance Level 4 (EAL4) augmented of AVA_VLA.4, ADV_IMP.2 , ALC_DVS.2 under the Common Criteria maintenance scheme. Atmel Smart Card ICs, a division of ATMEL Corporation, is the developer and the sponsor for the AVR ASL4 evaluations. 5 The devices in the AVR ASL4 family are based on the AVR RISC family of single-chip microcontroller devices. The AVR RISC family, with designed-in security features, is based on the industry-standard AVR low-power HCMOS core and gives access to the powerful instruction set of this widely used device. AVR ASL4 devices are equipped with Flash, RAM, ROM and EEPROM, cryptographic coprocessors, and a host of security features to protect device assets, making them suitable for a wide range of smartcard applications. TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 9 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 1.3 6 This Security Target Lite is conformant to parts 2 and 3 of the Common Criteria, V2.1, as follows: Part 2 conformant: the security functional requirements are based on those identified in part 2 of the Common Criteria. Part 3 augmented conformant: the security assurance requirements, including those used in the augmentation, are based on those in part 3 of the Common Criteria. 1.4 7 Common Criteria Conformance Claim Document Objective The purpose of this document is to satisfy the Common Criteria (CC) requirements for a Security Target Lite; in particular, to specify the security requirements and functions, and the assurance requirements and measures, in accordance with Protection Profile PP/9806, Smartcard Integrated Circuit V2.0, against which the AVR ASL4 devices will be evaluated. 1.5 Document Structure 8 Section 1 introduces the Security Target Lite, and includes sections on terminology and references. 9 Section 2 contains the product description and describes the TOE as an aid to the understanding of its security requirements and addresses the product type, the intended usage and the general features of the TOE. 10 Section 3 describes the TOE security environment. 11 Section 4 describes the required security objectives. 12 Section 5 describes the TOE security functional requirements and the security assurance requirements. 13 Section 6 describes the TOE security functions. 14 Section 7 describes the Protection Profile (PP) claims. 15 Appendix A provides a glossary of the terms and abbreviations. 10 of 64 General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 1.6 Scope and Terminology 16 This document is based on the TOE Technical Data Sheet [TD]. 17 The term Target of Evaluation (TOE) is standard CC terminology and refers to the product being evaluated, the AT90SC6404RT MCU device in this case. The TOE is subject to hardware evaluation only. Downloaded test software will be used for evaluation purposes but is outside the scope of the TOE. Description of how to use the security features can be found in [TD]. 18 Security objectives are defined herein with labels in the form O.xx_xx. These labels are used elsewhere for reference. Similarly, threats, assumptions and organizational security policy are defined with labels of the form T.xx_xx, A.xx_xx, and P.xx_xx respectively. 19 Hexadecimal numbers are prefixed by $, e.g. $FF is 255 decimal. Binary numbers are prefixed by %, e.g. %0001 1011 is decimal 27. An integer value may be expressed as a hexadecimal, binary or decimal number, whichever form is the most convenient. 1.7 20 References This document refers to the latest issues of the following Atmel documents: [STI] AT90SC6404RT Test Hardware Specification [ROMA] AT90SC6404RT Test Software Specification (ROM A) [RE2D] AT90SC6404RT Test Software Specification (related E2 data) [TMRE2] AT90SC6404RT Test Software Specification (testmoderun E2 data) [TD] AT90SC6404RT Technical Data (TPR0125) [SOF] TOE Strength of Security Functions Analysis TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 11 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 1.8 12 of 64 Revision History Rev Date Description Originator A 24 Nov 04 Initial release Atmel, RFO General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) Section 2 Target of Evaluation Description 21 This part of the Security Target Lite [ST_Lite] describes the Target of Evaluation (TOE) as an aid to the understanding of its security requirements and address the product type, the intended usage and the general features of the TOE. 2.1 Product Type 22 The TOE is the single chip microcontroller unit to be used in a smartcard product, independent of the physical interface and the way it is packaged. Specifically, the TOE is the AT90SC6404RT device from the AVR ASL4 family of smartcard devices. Generally, a smartcard product may include other optional elements (such as specific hardware components, batteries, capacitors, antennae) but these are not in the scope of this Security Target Lite. 23 The devices in the AVR ASL4 family are based on ATMEL's AVR RISC family of single-chip microcontroller devices. The AVR RISC family, with designed-in security features, is based on the industry-standard AVR RISC low-power HCMOS core and gives access to the powerful instruction set of this widely used device. Different AVR ASL4 family members offer various options. The AVR ASL4 family of devices are designed in accordance with the ISO standard for integrated circuit cards (ISO 7816), where appropriate. 24 Although the TOE evaluation is hardware only, the TOE requires embedded software to test the device and demonstrate certain security characteristics during the development phase. In the end-usage phase there will be no embedded test software in the TOE. Test software will be downloaded into the device EEPROM and be fully erased before devices leave the test environment. This test software is only used for the testing phase of the TOE life cycle and is outwith the scope of the evaluation. Test mode is disabled by wafer saw. 25 The TOE widely uses ATMEL high density non volatile memories: it features 64K bytes of AVR ROM program memory, 4K bytes of EEPROM program/data memory, 2K bytes of static RAM memory. 26 The EEPROM includes 64 bytes of One Time Programmable (OTP) memory (32 bytes are byte-addressable; 32 bytes are bit-addressable) and a 192-byte bit-addressable area. 27 The EEPROM contains both ATMEL and customer specific data. TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 13 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 28 The TOE also includes a 32bit Checksum Accelerator, a CRC-16 peripheral, a Random Number Generator, and a fast hardware DES/3DES peripheral. 29 The TOE includes security logic comprising detectors which monitor voltage, frequency temperature and UV light. 30 The TOE is equipped with logic peripherals including 2 timers, 1 serial port, an ISO7816 interface and an ISO7816 controller. 31 The TOE includes a powerful Firewall that protects all memories, peripheral and IO register accesses. This Firewall defines the 3 user modes and many different address spaces. 14 of 64 General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) Target of Evaluation Description 2.2 32 Smartcard Product Life-cycle The smartcard product life-cycle consists of 7 phases where the following authorities are involved. Table 2-1 Smartcard Product Life-cycle Phase 1 Smartcard software development The smartcard software developer is in charge of the smartcard embedded software development and the specification of IC pre-personalization requirements, Phase 2 IC Development The IC designer designs the IC, develops IC dedicated software, provides information, software or tools to the smartcard software developer, and receives the software from the developer, through trusted delivery and verification procedures. From the IC design, IC dedicated software and smartcard embedded software, the IC designer constructs the smartcard IC database, necessary for the IC photomask fabrication. Phase 3 IC manufacturing and testing The IC manufacturer is responsible for producing the IC through three main steps: IC manufacturing IC testing IC pre-personalization Phase 4 IC packaging and testing The IC packaging manufacturer is responsible for the IC packaging and testing. Phase 5 Smartcard product finishing process The smartcard product manufacturer is responsible for the smartcard product finishing process and testing. Phase 6 Smartcard personalization The personalizer is responsible for the smartcard personalization and final tests. Other application software may be loaded onto the chip at the personalization process. Phase 7 Smartcard end-usage The smartcard issuer is responsible for the smartcard product delivery to the smartcard end-user, and the end of life process. 33 The limits of the evaluation correspond to phases 2 and 3, including the phase 1 delivery and verification procedures and the TOE delivery to the IC packaging manufacturer ; procedures corresponding to phases 4, 5, 6 and 7 are outside the scope of this document. 34 Nevertheless, in certain cases, it would be of great interest to include the phase 4 (IC packaging and testing), within the limits of the TOE. However, for the time being, this option remains outside the scope of this document. TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 15 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite Figure 2-1 describes the Smartcard product life-cycle. 35 Phase 1 Development Phase IC Personalization requirements Embedded software Pre-personalization data (not applicable hardware only) Smartcard embedded software (not applicable) hardware only IC sensitive information software, tools (not applicable hardware only) Phase 2 IC Design Test Libraries IC Personalization requirements Product Construction Smartcard IC Database Construction Production Phase IC Dedicated Software Atmel Design Center IC Photomask Fabrication Phase 3 IC Manufacturing IC Personalization requirements IC Testing and Security Encoding IC Packaging Phase 4 Testing Phase 5 Testing Phase 6 Personalization Testing Phase 7 Legend Limits of the development cycle Trusted delivery and verification procedures Figure 2-1 16 of 64 Smartcard Product End-Usage End of Life Process Smartcard Product Life Cycle General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) Product Usage User Phase Smartcard Product Finishing Process Target of Evaluation Description 36 37 These different phases may be performed at different sites; procedures on the delivery process of the TOE shall exist and be applied for every delivery within a phase or between phases. This includes any kind of delivery performed from phase 1 to phase 7, including: Intermediate delivery of the TOE or the TOE under construction within a phase Delivery of the TOE or the TOE under construction from one phase to the next These procedures shall be compliant with the assumptions [A_DLV] developed in Section 3.2.2. 2.3 38 TOE Environment Considering the TOE, three types of environments are defined: Development environment corresponding to phase 2 Production environment corresponding to phase 3 User environment, from phase 4 to phase 7 2.3.1 TOE Development Environment 39 To assure security, the environment in which the development takes place is made secure with controllable accesses having traceability. Access to the development building is strictly monitored by a security person. Visitors must sign a log book and record the time of arrival and time of departure to the building. All visitors are escorted by authorized personnel at all times. All authorized personnel involved fully understand the importance and the rigid implementation of the defined security procedures. 40 The development begins with the TOE's specification. All parties in contact with sensitive information are required to abide by Non-Disclosure Agreements. 41 Reticles and photomasks are generated from the verified IC database. The reticles and photomasks are then shipped in a secure manner to the wafer fab processing facilities. 2.3.2 TOE Production Environment 42 Production starts within the ATMEL Wafer Fabrication plant; here the silicon wafers undergo diffusion processing in 25-wafer lots. Computer tracking at wafer level throughout the process is achieved by the batch tracking system. 43 The batch tracking system system is an on-line manufacturing tracking system which monitors the progress of the wafers through the fabrication cycle. After fabrication the wafers are sent to ATMEL Test Fab where they are thinned to a pre-specified thickness and tested. ATMEL Test Fab tests the TOE to assure conformance with the device specification. During the IC testing, security encoding is performed where some of the TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 17 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite EEPROM bytes are programmed with the unique traceability information, and the customer software is loaded in the EEPROM if required. 44 The wafers are inked to separate the functional ICs from the non-functional ICs. Finally, the wafers are sawn and then shipped to the customer. Unsawn wafers may be shipped to the customer if requested. 2.3.3 TOE User Environment 45 The TOE user environment is the environment of phases 4 to 7. 46 At phases 4, 5, and 6, the TOE user environment is a controlled environment. 47 Following the sawing step, the wafers are split into individual dies. The good ICs are assembled into modules in a module assembly plant. 48 Further testing is carried out followed by the shipment of the modules to the smartcard product manufacturer (embedder) by means of a secure carrier. 49 Additional testing occurs followed by smartcard personalization, retesting and then delivery to the smartcard issuer. End-user environment (Phase 7) 50 Smartcards are used in a wide range of applications to assure authorized conditional access. Examples of such are Pay-TV, Banking Cards, Portable communication SIM cards, Health cards, Transportation cards. 51 Therefore, the user environment covers a wide spectrum of very different functions, thus making it difficult to avoid or monitor any abuse of the TOE. 2.4 52 18 of 64 TOE Logical Phases During its construction usage, the TOE may be under several life logical phases. These phases are sorted under a logical controlled sequence. The change from one phase to the next shall be under the TOE control. General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) Target of Evaluation Description 2.5 53 54 TOE Intended Usage The TOE can be incorporated in several applications such as: Banking and finance market for credit/debit cards, electronic purse (stored value cards) and electronic commerce. Network based transaction processing such as mobile phones (GSM SIM cards), pay-TV (subscriber and pay-per-view cards), communication highways (Internet access and transaction processing). Transport and ticketing market (access control cards). Governmental cards (ID-cards, healthcards, driver license etc). Multimedia commerce and Intellectual Property Rights protection. During the phases 1, 2, 3, the product is being developed and produced. The administrators are the following: The IC designer: Authorized staff who work for the developer, and who design the MCU (such development staff are trusted and privileged users). The IC manufacturer: Authorized staff who work for the developer and who manufacture and test the MCU (such manufacturing staff are trusted and priviliged users). The smartcard dedicated software developer: Authorized staff who work for the developer and who develop the dedicated test software and crypto libraries (such development staff are trusted and priviliged users). TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 19 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 55 Table 2-2 lists the users of the product during phases 4 to 7. Table 2-2 Phase 4 Phase 5 Phase 6 Phase 7 Phases 4 to 7 Product Users Packaging manufacturer (administrator) Smartcard embedded software developer System integrator, such as the terminal software developer Smartcard product manufacturer (administrator) Smartcard embedded software developer System integrator, such as the terminal software developer Personalizer (administrator) Customers who, before manufacture, determine the MCU’s mask options and the initial memory contents (i.e. the application program), and who, after manufacture, incorporate the MCU into devices. Customers are trusted and privileged users. Smartcard issuer (administrator). Smartcard embedded software developer. System integrator, such as the terminal software developer. Smartcard issuer (administrator) Smartcard end-user, who use devices incorporating the MCU. End-users are not trusted and may attempt to attack the MCU. Smartcard software developer. System integrator, such as the terminal software developer. Note 56 The IC manufacturer and the smartcard product manufacturer may also receive ICs for analysis, should problems occur during the smartcard usage. The MCU may be used in the following modes: a) Test mode, in which the MCU runs under the control of dedicated test software written to EEPROM via a test interface, and in conjunction with stimulus provided by an external test system. This mode is intended to be used solely by authorized development staff. b) User mode, in which the MCU runs under control of the smartcard embedded software. It is intended that customers and end-users will always use the MCU in user mode. 20 of 64 General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) Target of Evaluation Description 57 During the initial part of the manufacturing process, the MCU is set to test mode. Authorized development staff then test the MCU. After testing, test mode is permanently disabled and the MCU is set to user mode. 58 If a faulty MCU is returned from the field then analysis can only be done in user mode because test mode is inhibited by sawing off the critical wires, prior to devices going to the field. 59 There is no intermediate mode for fault analysis. The only modes of operation are those stated in paragraph 56. 60 Once manufactured, the MCU operates by executing the smartcard embedded software, which is stored in AVR ROM. The contents of the AVR ROM cannot be modified, whereas the contents of the EEPROM can, in general, be written to or erased, under the control of the smartcard embedded software. 61 The EEPROM includes OTP bytes, which can be used to store security-related information such as cryptographic keys. The OTP bytes cannot be erased in user mode. 62 The FireWall (Memories and Peripherals Protection Unit) allows the smartcard embedded software to prevent read/write/execute access to (parts of) AVR ROM, EEPROM, RAM and peripherals from EEPROM. 63 After an MCU reset, the contents of the RAM are initialized to a random value (except 32 bytes of protected RAM). 64 The ISO7816 compliant I/O port can be used to pass data to or from the MCU. The application program determines how to interpret the data. 2.6 65 General IT Features of the TOE The TOE IT functionalities consist of data storage and processing such as: Arithmetic functions (e.g. incrementing counters in electronic purses, calculating currency conversion in electronic purses) Data communication Cryptographic operations (e.g. data encryption, digital signature verification) TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 21 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 22 of 64 General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) TOE Security Environment Section 3 TOE Security Environment 66 This section describes the security aspects of the environment in which the TOE is intended to be used, and addresses the description of the assumptions, the assets to be protected, the threats, and the organizational security policies. 3.1 67 Assets Assets are security relevant elements of the TOE that include the: Application data of the TOE comprising the IC pre-personalization requirements, such as the AVR ROM, EEPROM and OTP contents. Smartcard embedded software IC specification, design, development tools and technology 68 Therefore, the TOE itself is an asset. 69 Assets must be protected in terms of confidentiality, integrity and availability. 3.2 70 71 Assumptions It is assumed that this section concerns the following items: Due to the definition of the TOE limits, any assumption for the smartcard software development (phase 1 is outside the scope of the TOE) Any assumption from phases 4 to 7 for the secure usage of the TOE, including the TOE trusted delivery procedures Security is always dependent on the whole system: the weakest element of the chain determines the total system security. Assumptions described hereafter must be considered for a secure system using smartcard products: Assumptions on phase 1 Assumptions on the TOE delivery process (phases 4 to 7) Assumptions on phases 4-5-6 Assumptions on phase 7 TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 23 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 3.2.1 A.SOFT_ARCHI The smartcard embedded software shall be designed in a secure manner, that is focusing on integrity of program and data. A.DEV_ORG Procedures dealing with physical, personnel, organizational, technical measures for the confidentiality and integrity of smartcard embedded software (e.g. source code and any associated documents) and IC designer proprietary information (tools, software, documentation.) shall exist and be applied in software development. 3.2.2 72 24 of 64 Assumptions on Phase 1 Assumptions on the TOE Delivery Process (Phases 4 to 7) Procedures shall guarantee the control of the TOE delivery and storage process and conformance to its objectives as described in the following assumptions. A.DLV_PROTECT Procedures shall ensure protection of TOE material and information under delivery and storage. A procedure shall ensure protection of the TOE for unsawn wafer delivery. A.DLV_AUDIT Procedures shall ensure that corrective actions are taken in case of improper operation in the delivery process and storage. A.DLV_RESP Procedures shall ensure that people dealing with the procedure for delivery have got the required skill. General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) 3.2.3 Assumptions on Phases 4 to 6 A.USE_TEST It is assumed that appropriate functionality testing of the IC is used in phases 4, 5 and 6. A.USE_PROD It is assumed that security procedures are used during all manufacturing and test operations through phases 4, 5, 6 to maintain confidentiality and integrity of the TOE and of its manufacturing and test data (to prevent any possible copy, modification, retention, theft or unauthorized use). In the case when unsawn wafers are delivered, appropriate guidance on sawing will be known and used by the customer. 3.2.4 Assumptions on Phase 7 A.USE_DIAG It is assumed that secure communication protocols and procedures are used between smartcard and terminal. A.USE_SYS It is assumed that the integrity and confidentiality of sensitive data stored/handled by the system (terminals, communications...) is maintained. TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 25 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 3.3 Threats 73 The TOE as defined in Section 2 is required to counter the threats described hereafter; a threat agent wishes to abuse the assets either by functional attacks, environmental manipulations, specific hardware manipulations or by any other types of attacks. 74 Threats have to be split in: Threats against which specific protection within the TOE is required (class I), Threats against which specific protection within the environment is required (class II). 3.3.1 Unauthorized Full or Partial Cloning of the TOE T.CLON Functional cloning of the TOE (full or partial) appears to be relevant to any phases of the TOE life-cycle, from phase 1 to phase 7. Generally, this threat is derived from specific threats combining unauthorized disclosure, modification or theft of assets at different phases. 3.3.2 75 Threats on Phase 1 (Delivery and Verification Procedures) During phase 1, three types of threats have to be considered: a) Threats on the smartcard’s embedded software and its environment of development, such as: 76 Unauthorized disclosure Modification or theft of the smartcard embedded software and any additional data at phase 1. Considering the limits of the TOE, these previous threats are outside the scope of this document. a) Threats on the assets transmitted from the IC designer to the smartcard software developer during the smartcard development. b) Threats on the smartcard embedded software and any additional application data transmitted during the delivery process from the smartcard embedded software developer to the IC designer. 26 of 64 General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) TOE Security Environment 77 The previous types b and c threats are described hereafter. T.DIS_INFO Unauthorized disclosure of the assets delivered by the IC designer to the smartcard software developer such as sensitive information on IC specification, design and technology, software and tools if applicable. T.DIS_DEL Unauthorized disclosure of the smartcard embedded software and any additional application data (such as IC pre-personalization requirements) during the delivery process to the IC designer. T.MOD_DEL Unauthorized modification of the smartcard embedded software and any additional application data (such as IC pre-personalization requirements) during the delivery process to the IC designer. T.T_DEL Theft of the smartcard embedded software and any additional application data (such as IC pre-personalization requirements) during the delivery process to the IC designer. 3.3.3 78 Threats on Phases 2 to 7 During these phases, the assumed threats could be described in three types: Unauthorized disclosure of assets Theft or unauthorized use of assets Unauthorized modification of assets Unauthorized disclosure of assets 79 This type of threats covers unauthorized disclosure of assets by attackers who may possess a wide range of technical skills, resources and motivation. Such attackers may also have technical awareness of the product. T.DIS_DESIGN Unauthorized disclosure of IC design. This threat covers the unauthorized disclosure of proprietary elements such as IC specification, IC design, IC technology detailed information, IC hardware security mechanisms specifications. T.DIS_SOFT TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) Unauthorized disclosure of smartcard embedded software and data such as access control, authentication system, data protection system, memory partitioning, cryptographic programs. General Business Use 27 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite T.DIS_DSOFT Unauthorized disclosure of IC dedicated software. This threat covers the unauthorized disclosure of IC dedicated software including security mechanisms specifications and implementation. T.DIS_TEST Unauthorized disclosure of test information such as full results of IC testing including interpretations. T.DIS_TOOLS Unauthorized disclosure of development tools. This threat covers potential disclosure of IC development tools and testing tools (analysis tools, microprobing tools). T.DIS_PHOTOMASK Unauthorized disclosure of photomask information, used for photoengraving during the silicon fabrication process. Theft or unauthorized use of assets 80 Potential attackers may gain access to the TOE and perform operations for which they are not authorized. For example, such attackers may personalize the product in an unauthorized manner, or try to gain fraudulous access to the smartcard system. T.T_SAMPLE Theft or unauthorized use of TOE silicon samples, for example, bond out chips. T.T_PHOTOMASK Theft or unauthorized use of TOE photomasks. T.T_PRODUCT Theft or unauthorized use of smartcard products. Unauthorized modification of assets 81 The TOE may be subjected to different types of logical or physical attacks which may compromise security. Due to the intended usage of the TOE (the TOE environment may be hostile), the TOE security parts may be bypassed or compromised reducing the integrity of the TOE security mechanisms and disabling their ability to manage the TOE security. This type of threat includes the implementation of malicious trojan horses. T.MOD_DESIGN Unauthorized modification of IC design. This threat covers the unauthorized modification of IC specification, IC design including IC hardware security mechanisms specifications and realization. 28 of 64 T.MOD_PHOTOMASK Unauthorized modification of TOE photomasks. T.MOD_DSOFT Unauthorized modification of IC dedicated software including modification of security mechanisms. T.MOD_SOFT Unauthorized modification of smartcard embedded software and data. General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) TOE Security Environment 82 Table 3-1 indicates the relationships between the smartcard phases and the threats. Table 3-1 Threats and Phases Threats Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Phase 6 Phase 7 Class II Class II Class I/II Class I Class I Class I Class I T.DIS_SOFT Class II Class I/II Class I Class I Class I Class I T.DIS_DSOFT Class II Class I/II Class I Class I Class I Class I T.DIS_DESIGN Class II Class I/II Class I Class I Class I Class I Class I/II Class I Class I Class I Class I Functional cloning T.CLON Unauthorized disclosure of assets T.DIS_INFO Class II T.DIS_DEL Class II T.DIS_TOOLS Class II Class II T.DIS_PHOTOMASK Class II Class II T.DIS_TEST Theft or unauthorized use of assets T.T_DEL Class II T.T_SAMPLE Class II Class I/II Class I T.T_PHOTOMASK Class II Class II T.T_PRODUCT Class I/II Class I Class I Class I Class I Unauthorized modification threats T.MOD_DEL Class II T.MOD_SOFT Class II Class I/II Class I Class I Class I Class I T.MOD_DSOFT Class II Class I/II Class I Class I Class I Class I Class I Class I Class I T.MOD_DESIGN Class II Class I/II Class I T.MOD_PHOTOMASK Class II Class II TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 29 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 3.4 Organizational Security Policies 83 An organizational security policy is mandatory for the smartcard product usage. The specifications of organizational security policies essentially depend on the applications in which the TOE is incorporated. 84 However, it was found relevant to address the following organizational security policy with the TOE because most of the actual Smart Card secure applications make use of cryptographic standards. P.CRYPTO Cryptographic entities, data authentication, and approval functions must be in accordance with ISO, associated industry, or organizational standards or requirements. Various cryptographic algorithms and mechanisms, such as triple DES, AES, RSA, MACs, and Digital Signatures, are accepted international standards. These, or others in accordance with industry or organizational standards of similar maturity and definition, should be used for all cryptographic operations in the TOE. These cryptographic operations are used for instance to support establishment and control of a trusted channel between the TOE and the outside environment. To support these cryptographic functions, the TOE should supply Random Number Generation (RNG) with sufficient unpredictability and entropy. The TOE shall ensure that no information about the produced random numbers is available to an attacker since they might be used for instance to generate cryptographic keys. 30 of 64 General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) Security Objectives Section 4 Security Objectives 85 The security objectives of the TOE cover principally the following aspects: Integrity and confidentiality of assets Protection of the TOE and associated documentation during development and production phases 4.1 86 Security Objectives for the TOE The TOE shall use state of art technology to achieve the following IT security objectives: O.TAMPER The TOE must prevent physical tampering with its security critical parts. The TOE must provide protection against disclosure of User data, against disclosure/reconstruction of the Smartcard Embedded Software or against disclosure of other critical operational information. This includes protection against direct micro-probing of signals not connected to bonding pads, but also other contact or contactless probing techniques such as laser probing or electromagnetic sensing. Most of these techniques require a prior reverse engineering of parts of the device to understand its architecture and its security functions. This also includes protection against inherent information leakage (for example shape of signals, power consumption) on the device external interfaces (for example clock, supply, I/O lines) that could be used to disclose confidential data, as well as forced information leakage caused by induced malfunction or physical manipulation TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 31 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite O.CLON The TOE functionality needs to be protected from cloning. The TOE must include means to prevent an attacker from reproducing the smartcard functionality. Most of these techniques require a prior reverse engineering of parts of the device to understand its architecture and its security functions. O.OPERATE The TOE must ensure the continued correct operation of its security functions. The TOE must include protection against the use of stolen silicon samples or products that would ease an attacker gaining fraudulous access to the smartcard system. The TOE must also provide mechanisms to avoid the unauthorized modification of the security functions or software and data, by using the device test commands for instance, or by using uncontrolled/unauthentified software access to memories. The TOE must prevent its operation outside the normal operating conditions where reliability and secure operation has not been proven or tested. This is to prevent errors. The environmental conditions may include voltage, clock frequency, temperature, or external energy fields O.FLAW The TOE must not contain flaws in design, implementation or operation. The TOE design must include protection against modification of its security mechanisms (for example detectors or memory protections) that would lead to bypass or reduce their integrity, and therefore open security holes that could be used to access embedded software and data. The TOE design must also provide protection against modification of its embedded software that would lead to bypass or reduce the integrity of some software controlled security mechanisms (for example memory areas definition), and therefore open security holes that could be used to access embedded software and data. O.DIS_MECHANISM The TOE shall ensure that the hardware security mechanisms are protected against unauthorized disclosure. The TOE must be designed and fabricated so that it requires a high combination of complex equipment, knowledge, skill and time to derive detailed designed information or other information which could be used to compromise security through physical attacks. 32 of 64 General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) O.DIS_MEMORY The TOE shall ensure that sensitive information stored in memories is protected against unauthorized access. The TOE must provide protection against unauthorized access to embedded software and data stored in memories, either using test commands, or by some embedded software (for instance a non-supervisor user application) that would try to dump the memories protected by the Firewall programmation (for instance the supervisor program and/or data), or even by some physical attacks. O.MOD_MEMORY The TOE shall ensure that sensitive information stored in memories is protected against any corruption or unauthorized modification. The TOE must provide protection against unauthorized access to embedded software and data stored in memories, either using test commands, or by some embedded software (for instance a non-supervisor user application) that would try to modify the memories protected by the Firewall programmation (for instance the supervisor program and/or data), or even by some physical attacks. O.CRYPTO Cryptographic capability shall be available for users to maintain integrity and confidentiality of sensitive data. The TOE must provide hardware implementation of some cryptographic algorithms that can be used by the embedded software in conjunction with appropriate counter-measure to achieve cryptographic operations (for instance encryption, decryption, integrity checking, signature, key generation, for algorithms such as DES, TDES, RSA, SHA-1, DSA, Elliptic Curves, ...). These cryptographic operations are used for instance to support establishment and control of a trusted channel between the TOE and the outside environment, or protect confidential data stored in the TOE memories. The TOE must also provide random number generation and ensure the cryptographic quality of random number generation. For example, random numbers shall not be predictable and shall have a sufficient entropy. The TOE must ensure that no information about the produced random numbers is available to an attacker since they might be used for instance to generate cryptographic keys. TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 33 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 4.2 4.2.1 Security Objectives for the Environment Objectives on Phase 1 O.DEV_DIS The smartcard IC designer must have procedures to control the sales, distribution, storage and usage of the software and hardware development tools and classified documents, suitable to maintain the integrity and the confidentiality of the assets of the TOE. It must be ensured that: 34 of 64 Tools are only delivered to the parties authorized personnel. Confidential information such as data sheets and general information on defined assets are only delivered to the parties authorized personnel on the basis of need-to-know. O.SOFT_DLV The smartcard embedded software must be delivered from the smartcard embedded software developer (Phase 1) to the IC designer through a trusted delivery and verification procedure that shall be able to maintain the integrity of the software and its confidentiality, if applicable. O.SOFT_MECH To achieve the level of security required by this Security Target Lite, the smartcard embedded software shall use IC security features and security mechanisms (for example, sensors) as specified in the smartcard IC documentation [TD]. O.DEV_TOOLS The smartcard embedded software shall be designed in a secure manner, by using exclusively software development tools (compilers, assemblers, linkers, simulators etc.) and software-hardware integration testing tools (emulators) that will grant the integrity of program and data. General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) Security Objectives 4.2.2 Objectives on Phase 2 (Development Phase) O.SOFT_ACS Embedded software shall be accessible only by authorized personnel within the IC designer on the basis of need-to-know. O.DESIGN_ACS IC specifications, detailed design, IC databases, schematics/layout or any further design information shall be accessible only by authorized personnel within the IC designer on the basis of need-to-know (physical, personnel, organizational, technical procedures). O.DSOFT_ACS Any IC dedicated software specification, detailed design, source code or any further information shall be accessible only by authorized personnel within the IC designer on the basis of need-to-know. O.MASK_FAB Physical, personnel, organizational, technical procedures during photomask fabrication (including deliveries between photomasks manufacturer and IC manufacturer) shall ensure the integrity and confidentiality of the TOE. O.MECH_ACS Details of hardware security mechanisms shall be accessible only by authorized personnel within the IC designer on the basis of need-to-know. O.TI_ACS Security relevant technology information shall be accessible only by authorized personnel within the IC designer on the basis of need-to-know. TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 35 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 4.2.3 Objectives on Phase 3 (Manufacturing Phase) O.TOE_PRT The manufacturing process shall ensure that protection of the TOE from any kind of unauthorized use such as tampering or theft. During the IC manufacturing and test operations, security procedures shall ensure the confidentiality and integrity of: TOE manufacturing data (to prevent any possible copy, modification, retention, theft or unauthorized use). TOE security relevant test programs, test data, databases and specific analysis methods and tools. These procedures shall define a security system applicable during the manufacturing and test operations to maintain confidentiality and integrity of the TOE by control of: O.IC_DLV 36 of 64 Packaging and storage. Traceability. Storage and protection of manufacturing process specific assets (such as manufacturing process documentation, further data, or samples) Access control and audit to tests, analysis tools, laboratories, and databases. Change/modification in the manufacturing equipment, management of rejects. The delivery procedures from the IC manufacturer shall maintain the integrity and confidentiality of the TOE and its assets. General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) Security Objectives 4.2.4 Objectives on the TOE Delivery Process (Phases 4 to 7) O.DLV_PROTECT Procedures shall ensure protection of TOE material (including sawn and unsawn wafers) and information under delivery, including the following objectives: Non-disclosure of any security relevant information. Identification of the elements under delivery. Meet confidentiality rules (confidentiality level, transmittal form, reception acknowledgement). Physical protection to prevent external damage. Secure storage and handling procedures are applicable for all TOEs (including rejected TOEs). Traceability of TOE during delivery including the following parameters: Origin and shipment details. Reception, reception acknowledgement. Location material and information. O.DLV_AUDIT Procedures shall ensure that corrective actions are taken in the event of improper operation in the delivery process (including, if applicable any non-conformance to the confidentiality convention) and highlight all non conformance to this process. O.DLV_RESP Procedures shall ensure that people (shipping department, carrier, reception department) dealing with the procedure for delivery get the required skill, training and knowledge to meet the procedure requirements, and to act in full accordance with the above expectations. 4.2.5 Objectives on Phase 4 to 6 O.TEST_OPERATE Appropriate functionality testing of the IC shall be used in phases 4 to 6. During all manufacturing and test operations, security procedures shall be used through phases 4, 5, 6, to maintain confidentiality and integrity of the TOE and of its manufacturing and test data. This objective applies to both sawn and unsawn wafers. TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 37 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 4.2.6 38 of 64 Objectives on Phase 7 O.USE_DIAG Secure communication protocols and procedures shall be used between smartcard and terminal. O.USE_SYS The integrity and the confidentiality of sensitive data stored or handled by the system (terminals, communications....) shall be maintained. General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) TOE Security Functional Requirements Section 5 TOE Security Functional Requirements 87 The TOE security functional requirements define the functional requirements for the TOE using only functional requirements components drawn from the Common Criteria part 2. 88 The minimum strength of function level for the TOE security requirements is SOF-high. 5.1 Functional Requirements Applicable to Phase 3 Only (Testing Phase) 5.1.1 89 The TOE security functions shall require each user to be successfully authenticated before allowing any other TOE security functions-mediated actions on behalf of that user. 5.1.2 90 User Identification Before any Action (FIA_UID.2) The TOE security functions shall require each user to identify itself before allowing any other TOE security functions mediated actions on behalf of that user. 5.1.3 91 User Authentication Before any Action (FIA_UAU.2) User Attribute Definition (FIA_ATD.1) The TOE security functions shall maintain the following list of security attributes belonging to individual users: Test mode access right Read AVR ROM access right Write AVR ROM access right Execute AVR ROM access right Read EEPROM access right Write EEPROM access right Execute EEPROM access right Read RAM access right Write RAM access right TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 39 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite Execute RAM access right Read access right to peripherals and IO registers Write access right to peripherals and IO registers Execute access right to peripherals and IO registers 5.1.4 92 The TOE security functions shall: Run a suite of self tests at the request of the authorized user to demonstrate the correct operation of the TOE security functions. Provide authorized users with the capability to verify the integrity of TOE security functions data. Provide authorized users with the capability to verify the integrity of stored TOE security functions executable code. 5.1.5 93 40 of 64 TOE Security Functions Testing (FPT_TST.1) Stored Data Integrity Monitoring (FDP_SDI.1) The TOE security functions shall monitor user data stored within the TOE scope of control for integrity errors on all objects, based on the following attributes: Test signatures from AVR ROM Test signatures from AVR RAM Test signatures from EEPROM General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) 5.2 Functional Requirements Applicable to Phases 3 to 7 5.2.1 Management of Security Functions Behaviour (FMT_MOF.1) 94 The TOE security functions shall restrict the ability to enable the functions available in Test Mode to the Test Mode Entry (TME) administrator. 95 The TOE security functions shall restrict the ability to disable the functions available in Test Mode to the Test Mode Entry (TME) administrator. 5.2.2 96 Management of Security Attributes (FMT_MSA.1) The TOE security functions shall enforce the ACSF_Policy (Access Control Security Functions Policy) and IFCSF_Policy (Information Flow Control Security Functions Policy) to restrict the ability to access the security attributes to TME administrator and Firewall supervisor/non-supervisor modes. The ACSF_Policy is not described in this document. See Table 5-1 for further information on the IFCSF_Policy. Note 5.2.3 97 98 Security Roles (FMT_SMR.1) The TOE security functions shall maintain the role of: TME administrator Firewall supervisor/non-supervisor modes The TOE security functions shall be able to associate users with roles. TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 41 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 5.2.4 Specification of Management Functions (FMT_SMF.1) The TOE security functions shall be capable of performing the following security management functions: Control entry into and disabling of test mode, and entry into user mode. Define the user modes, (Firewall supervisor/non-supervisor modes) address space parameters. Which controls the software access between each program user regions, but also between the program user and the data user regions. 5.2.5 99 The TOE security functions shall: Enforce the ACSF_Policy and IFCSF_Policy to provide restrictive default values for security attributes that are used to enforce the security functions policy Allow the TME administrator to specify alternate initial values to override the default values when an object or information is created 5.2.6 100 101 42 of 64 Complete Access Control (FDP_ACC.2) The TOE security functions shall enforce the ACSF_Policy on: TME administrator, Firewall supervisor, non-supervisor modes. AVR ROM, EEPROM, RAM, peripheral and IO registers. And all operations among subjects and objects covered by the security functions policy. The TOE security functions shall ensure that all operations between any subject in the TOE scope of control and any object within the TOE scope of control are covered by an access control security functions policy. 5.2.7 102 Static Attribute Initialization (FMT_MSA.3) Security Attribute Based Access Control (FDP_ACF.1) The TOE security functions shall enforce the ACSF_Policy to objects based on: Read AVR ROM access right Write AVR ROM access right Execute AVR ROM access right Read EEPROM access right Write EEPROM access right Execute EEPROM access right Read RAM access right Write RAM access right General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) TOE Security Functional Requirements Execute RAM access right Read peripheral and IO registers access right Write peripheral and IO registers access right Execute peripheral and IO registers access right 103 The TOE security functions shall enforce the following rules to determine if an operation among controlled subjects and controlled objects is allowed. 104 Firewall rules, that are not disclosed in this ST-Lite document. 105 The TOE security functions shall explicitly authorize access of subjects to objects based on the following additional rules: no additional rules. TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 43 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 5.2.8 106 Subset Information Flow Control (FDP_IFC.1) The TOE security functions will enforce the IFCSF_Policy on TME administrator, test commands and test operations that cause controlled information to flow between the: AVR ROM and the Test Mode Entry administrator EEPROM and the Test Mode Entry administrator RAM and the Test Mode Entry administrator Peripheral and IO registers and the Test Mode administrator 5.2.9 Simple Security Attributes (FDP_IFF.1) 107 The TOE security functions shall enforce the IFCSF_Policy based on the following types of subject and information security attributes: test command syntax. 108 The TOE security functions will: Permit an information flow between a controlled subject and controlled information via a controlled operation if the following rules hold: test command syntax rules. Provide no additional information flow control security functions policy rules. Enforce no additional security functions policy capabilities. 109 The TOE security functions shall explicitly authorize an information flow based on the following rules: 110 Test command syntax rules, based on test command syntax, that explicitly authorize information flows between TME administrator and: AVR ROM EEPROM RAM Peripheral and IO registers 111 The TOE security functions shall explicitly deny an information flow based on the following rules: 112 Test command syntax rules, based on test command syntax, that explicitly deny information flows between TME administrator and: 44 of 64 AVR ROM EEPROM RAM Peripheral and IO registers General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) TOE Security Functional Requirements IFCSF-Policy Table 5-1 IFCSF-Policy Rules Test command syntax rules Attribute Test command syntax TME Administrator Data flow (1) (1) 5.2.10 All information about possible data flow and Test command syntax can be found in [STI], [ROMA], [RE2D] and [TMRE2]. Potential Violation Analysis (FAU_SAA.1) 113 The TOE Security Functions shall be able to apply a set of rules in monitoring the audited events and based upon these rules indicate a potential violation of the TOE Security Policy. 114 The TOE security functions shall enforce the following rules for monitoring audited events: a) Accumulation or combination of abnormal environmental conditions (Supply voltage, clock input frequency, temperature, UV light) known to indicate a potential security violation, b) Accumulation or combination of physical tampering (Micro-probing, critical FIB modification) known to indicate a potential security violation, c) Accumulation or combination of Firewall violations (user trying to illegally access controlled memories or objects, user trying to execute illegal opcodes) known to indicate a potential security violation. d) Accumulation of watchdog violations known to indicate a potential security violation. e) No other rules. 5.2.11 115 Unobservability (FPR_UNO.1) The TOE security functions shall ensure that any users are unable to observe the operation of TOE internal activity on TOE objects by authorized users or subjects. TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 45 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 5.2.12 116 117 The TOE security functions shall: Provide unambiguous detection of physical tampering that might compromise the TOE security functions. Provide the capability to determine whether physical tampering with the TOE security functions’s devices or TOE security functions’s elements has occurred. For values of voltage, clock input frequency, temperature and UV light which go outside acceptable bounds, for micro-probing and critical FIB modification, for Firewall rules violations (including illegal opcodes), and for watchdog violations, the TOE security functions shall monitor the devices and elements and notify the supervisor mode when physical tampering with the TOE security functions’ devices or TOE security functions’ elements has occurred. 5.2.13 118 46 of 64 Resistance to Physical Attack (FPT_PHP.3) The TOE security functions shall resist tampering of voltage, clock input frequency, temperature, UV light, micro-probing, critical FIB modification, Firewall rules violations (including illegal opcodes), and watchdog violations to the TOE and its security functions by responding automatically such that the TOE security policy is not violated. 5.2.14 119 Notification of Physical Attack (FPT_PHP.2) Cryptographic Operation (FCS_COP.1) The TSF shall perform hardware data encryption and decryption in accordance with the: DES cryptographic algorithm using 56-bit cryptographic key sizes that meets the Data Encryption Standard (DES), FIPS PUB 46-3, 25th October, 1999. Triple Data Encryption Standard (TDES) cryptographic algorithm using 112-bit cryptographic key sizes that meets the E-D-E two-key triple-encryption implementation of the Data Encryption Standard, FIPS PUB 46-3, 25th October, 1999. General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) TOE Security Functional Requirements 5.3 TOE Security Assurance Requirements 120 The assurance requirement is EAL4 augmented of additional assurance components listed in the following sections. 121 Some of these components are hierarchical ones to the components specified in EAL4. 122 All the components are drawn from Common Criteria Part 3, V2.1. 5.3.1 ADV_IMP.2 Implementation of the TSF Developer actions elements 123 The developer shall provide the implementation representation for the entire TOE security functions. Content and presentation of evidence elements 124 The implementation representation shall: Unambiguously define the TOE security functions to a level of detail such that the TOE security functions can be generated without further design decisions Be internally consistent Describe the relationships between all portions of the implementation Evaluator actions elements 125 The evaluator shall: Confirm that the information provided meets all requirements for content and presentation of evidence. Determine that the implementation representation is an accurate and complete instantiation of the TOE security functional requirements. TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 47 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 5.3.2 ALC_DVS.2 Sufficiency of Security Measures Developer actions elements 126 The developer shall produce development security documentation. Content and presentation of evidence elements 127 128 The development security documentation shall: Describe all the physical, procedural, personnel, and other security measures that are necessary to protect the confidentiality and integrity of the TOE design and implementation in its development environment. Provide evidence that these security measures are followed during the development and maintenance of the TOE. The evidence shall justify that the security measures provide the necessary level of protection to maintain the confidentiality and integrity of the TOE. Evaluator actions elements 129 48 of 64 The evaluator shall confirm that the: Information provided meets all requirements for content and presentation of evidence Security measures are being applied General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) TOE Security Functional Requirements 5.3.3 AVA_VLA.4 Highly Resistant Developer actions elements 130 The developer shall: Perform a vulnerability analysis Provide vulnerability analysis documentation Content and presentation of evidence elements 131 The vulnerability analysis documentation shall: describe the analysis of the TOE deliverables performed to search for ways in which a user can violate the TSP. describe the disposition of identified vulnerabilities. show, for all identified vulnerabilities, that the vulnerability cannot be exploited in the intended environment for the TOE. justify that the TOE, with the identified vulnerabilities, is resistant to obvious penetration attacks. show that the search for vulnerabilities is systematic. provide a justification that the analysis completely addresses the TOE deliverables. Evaluator actions elements 132 The evaluator shall: Confirm that the information provided meets all requirements for content and presentation of evidence Conduct penetration testing, building on the developer vulnerability analysis, to ensure the identified vulnerabilities have been addressed. Perform independent vulnerability analysis Perform independent penetration testing, based on the independent vulnerability analysis, to determine the exploitability of additional identified vulnerabilities in the intended environment. Determine that the TOE is resistant to penetration attacks performed by an attacker possessing a high attack potential. TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 49 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 50 of 64 General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) TOE Summary Specification Section 6 TOE Summary Specification 133 This section defines the TOE security functions, and Figure 6-1 on page 56 specifies how they satisfy the TOE security functional requirements. 6.1 6.1.1 TOE Security Functions Test Mode Entry (SF1) 134 SF1 shall ensure that only authorized users will be permitted to enter Test Mode. This is provided by Test Mode Entry conditions that are required to enable the TOE to enter Test Mode. 135 All test entry requirements occur while the TOE is held in reset and failure in any one will prevent Test Mode Entry. It is required that the TOE satisfies the test entry conditions during any internal reset condition. 136 It is not possible to move from User Mode to Test Mode. Any attempt to do this, for example, by forcing internal nodes will be detected and the security functions will disable the ability to enter Test Mode. 137 The Strength of Function claimed for the Test Mode Entry security function is high. TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 51 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 6.1.2 Protected Test Memory Access (SF2) 138 SF2 shall ensure that, although authenticated users can have access to memories using commands in test mode, they cannot access directly their contents. 139 Only authorized design and production engineers running test on the TOE have access to the TME conditions. 140 The Strength of Function claimed for the Protected Test Memory Access security function is high. 6.1.3 141 Test Mode Disable (SF3) SF3 shall make provision for wafer sawing which, once done, shall ensure that none of the test features are available, not even to authenticated users in test mode. 6.1.4 TOE Testing (SF4) 142 SF4 shall provide embedded hardware test circuitry with high fault coverage to prevent faulty devices being released in the field. Devices with manufacturing problems (short circuits, open nets, ...) could lead to a poor level of security by disabling some security functions. 143 Testing of security functions is dependent on a fault free and fully functional TOE. The RAM, ROM, and standard cell logic (including the MCU) is tested by functional tests under the control of the test interface circuit. EEPROM is tested through the test interface circuit by external stimulus. CPU to EEPROM data flow will also be tested by functional tests, run from the EEPROM, using test software loaded under the control of the test interface circuit. 144 To conform with ISO 7816 standards the TOE embedded software will always return an Answer-To-Reset command via the serial I/O port. This contains messages with information on the integrity and identification of the device. An ATR also verifies significant portions of device hardware (CPU, ROM, EEPROM and logic). 6.1.5 Data Error Detection (SF5) 145 SF5 shall provide means for performing data error detection. 146 Means of performing checksum error detection and parity error detection is provided. The 32-bit Checksum Accelerator or the CRC-16 hardware peripheral can be used by the embedded software to compute fast data error detection on the program and/or data memories before starting any operation. 52 of 64 General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) TOE Summary Specification 6.1.6 147 FireWall (SF6) SF6 shall enforce access control based on the FireWall rules as defined in the ACSF_Policy. Memory protection 148 The FireWall defines different modes to execute embedded software (supervisor/nonsupervisor). 149 The different modes provide restricted access privilege to the memories, and to the MCU peripheral registers. In case of illegal accesses performed by the embedded software, a security action is invoked. Illegal address 150 If an illegal address is accessed, then a security action is invoked. Illegal opcode 151 If an attempt is made to execute any opcode that is not implemented in the instruction set, a security action is invoked. 6.1.7 Event Audit (SF7) 152 The TOE shall provide an Event Audit security function (SF7) to enforce the following rules for monitoring audited events. 153 Accumulation or combination of the following auditable events would indicate a potential security violation. 1. The external voltage supply goes outside acceptable bounds. 2. The external clock signal goes outside acceptable bounds. 3. The ambient temperature goes outside acceptable bounds. 4. Application program abnormal runaway. 5. Attempts to physically probe the device. 6. Attempts to gain illegal access to reserved RAM memory locations. 7. Attempts to gain illegal access to reserved EEPROM memory locations. 8. Attempts to gain illegal access to reserved peripheral or IO register locations. 9. Attempts to execute instruction to read the program memory from the nonsupervisor program location. 10. Attempts to move the RAM stack to an illegal RAM memory location. TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 53 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 11. Attempts to execute an AVR opcode that is not implemented. 12. Attempts to illegally write access the device’s EEPROM. 13. Attempts to gain illegal access to supervisor modes. 14. The exposure to UV light goes outside acceptable bounds. 154 The Strength of Function claimed for the Event audit security function is high. 6.1.8 155 156 SF8 shall provide an Event Action security function to register occurrences of audited events and take appropriate action. Detection of such occurrences will cause an information flag to be set, and may cause one of the following to occur if warranted by the violation: Memory wiping actions Different levels of immediate resets Different levels of security interrupt Event Action depends on the type of Event (see [TD] for more information). 6.1.9 157 Event Action (SF8) Unobservability (SF9) SF9 shall ensure that users/third parties will have difficulty observing the following operations on the TOE by the described means. 1. Extracting information, relating to any specific resource or service being used, by monitoring power consumption 2. Extracting information, relating to any specific resource or service being used, by carrying out timing analyses on cryptographic functions 3. Extracting information, relating to any specific resource or service being used, by using mechanical, electrical or optical means, in order to examine the topology of the TOE, including address and data buses and regular structures 158 54 of 64 The Strength of Function claimed for the Unobservability security function is high. General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) TOE Summary Specification 6.1.10 159 Cryptography (SF10) The TSF shall provide: A cryptographic algorithm to be able to transmit and receive objects in a manner protected from data retrieval or modification. Hardware DES, TDES data encryption/decryption capability. 160 Those may be used by the smartcard embedded software to support data encryption and decryption for maintaining data integrity, and protect against sensitive data unauthorized disclosure. 161 The TSF shall provide a Random Number Generator (RNG) to support security operations performed by cryptographic applications. This RNG shall not be predictable, have sufficient entropy, and not leaking information related to the value of the generated random numbers as this leakage could be used to retrieve cryptographic keys for instance. 162 The Strength of Function claimed for the cryptography security function is high. 163 An assessment of the strength of the following algorithms does not form part of the evaluation: DES algorithm TDES algorithm 6.1.11 Security Functions Based on Permutations/combinations 164 The description of security functions using permutation and/or combination properties is not disclosed in this document. 165 Further details on these mechanisms and on the Strength of Function Analysis performed by ATMEL can be found in [SOF]. TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 55 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite Table 6-1 Relationship Between Security Requirements and Security Functions 56 of 64 Test Mode Disable TOE Testing Data Error Detection FireWall Event Audit Event Action Unobservability SF3 SF4 SF5 SF6 SF7 SF8 SF9 x O1 x FIA_UID.2 O2 x FIA_ATD.1 O3 x FPT_TST.1 O4 x x x FDP_SDI.1 O5 FMT_MOF.1 O6 x FMT_MSA.1 O7 x FMT_SMR.1 O8 x x x FMT_SMF.1 O9 x x x FMT_MSA.3 O10 x x x FDP_ACC.2 O11 x x FDP_ACF.1 O12 x x FDP_IFC.1 O13 x x FDP_IFF.1 O14 x x FAU_SAA.1 O15 FPR_UNO.1 O16 FPT_PHP.2 O17 x x FPT_PHP.3 O18 x x FCS_COP.1 O19 General Business Use Cryptography Protected Test Memory Access SF2 x FIA_UAU.2 SF10 Test Mode Entry Security Requirement SF1 Security Functions x x x x x x x x x x x x TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) 6.2 166 This section defines the TOE assurance measures and Figure 6-2 on page 59 specifies how they satisfy the TOE security assurance requirements. 6.2.1 167 Life Cycle Support (SA6) SA6 shall provide the “AT90SC6404RT CC Life Cycle Support (ALC)” interface document plus its references. 6.2.7 173 Guidance (SA5) SA5 shall provide the “AT90SC6404RT CC Guidance (AGD)” interface document plus its references. 6.2.6 172 Development Activity (SA4) SA4 shall provide the “AT90SC6404RT CC Development Activity (ADV)” interface document plus its references. 6.2.5 171 Delivery and Operation (SA3) SA3 shall provide the “AT90SC6404RT CC Delivery and Operation (ADO)” interface document plus its references. 6.2.4 170 Configuration Management (SA2) SA2 shall provide the “AT90SC6404RT CC Configuration Management (ACM)” interface document plus its references. 6.2.3 169 Security Target (SA1) SA1 shall provide the “AT90SC6404RT Security Target” document plus its references. 6.2.2 168 TOE Assurance Measures Test Activity (SA7) SA7 shall provide the “AT90SC6404RT CC Test Activity (ATE)” interface document plus its references, and undertaking of testing described therein. TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 57 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 6.2.8 174 SA8 shall provide the “AT90SC6404RT CC Vulnerability Assessment (AVA)” interface document plus its references, and undertaking of vulnerability assessment described therein. 6.2.9 175 58 of 64 Manufacturing Site (SA12) SA12 shall provide access to the manufacturing site. 6.2.13 179 Test Site (SA11) SA11 shall provide access to the test sites. 6.2.12 178 Development Site (SA10) SA10 shall provide access to the development site. 6.2.11 177 Smart Card Devices (SA9) SA9 shall provide functional AT90SC6404RT smart card devices. 6.2.10 176 Vulnerability Assessment (SA8) Sub-contractor Sites (SA13) SA13 shall provide access to the sub-contractor sites. General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) TOE Summary Specification Sub-contractor Site Smartcard Devices SA9 SA13 Vulnerability assessment SA8 Manufacturing Site Test Activity SA7 SA12 Life Cycle Support SA6 Test Sites Guidance SA5 SA11 Development Activity SA4 Development Site Delivery and Operation SA3 ACM_AUT.1 x x x x x ACM_CAP.4 x x x x x ACM_SCP.2 x x x x x ASE_xxx SA1 SA10 Configuration Management Assurance Requirement SA2 Relationship Between Assurance Requirements and Measures Security Target Table 6-2 x ADO_DEL.2 x x x x x ADO_IGS.1 x x x x x ADV_FSP.2 x ADV_HLD.2 x ADV_IMP.2 x ADV_LLD.1 x ADV_RCR.1 x ADV_SPM.1 x AGD_ADM.1 x AGD_USR.1 x ALC_DVS.2 x x x x x ALC_LCD.1 x x x x x ALC_TAT.1 x x x x x ATE_COV.2 x x x ATE_DPT.1 x x x ATE_FUN.1 x x x ATE_IND.2 x x x AVA_MSU.2 x x AVA_SOF.1 x x AVA_VLA.4 x x TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 59 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite 60 of 64 General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) Protection Profile Claims Section 7 Protection Profile Claims 7.1 180 This Security Target Lite is compliant with CC Smartcard Integrated Circuit Protection Profile PP/9806, Version 2.0, Issue September 1998, and has been registered at the French Certification Body. 7.2 181 Protection Profile Reference Protection Profile Refinements Refinements to assumptions A.DLV_PROTECT, A.USE_PROD and objectives O.DLV_PROTECT, O.TEST_OPERATE relate to unsawn wafers and corresponding procedures and guidance. 7.3 7.3.1 Protection Profile Additions Cryptographic Capability 182 In addition to conforming to PP/9806, this Security Target Lite specifies an additional Organizational Security Policy P.CRYPTO in Section 3.4, and an additional Security Objective O.CRYPTO in Section 4.1. 183 The CC security functional requirement to meet this Organizational Security Policy is Cryptographic Operation (FCS_COP.1) , which is specified in Section 5. 184 The security function to satisfy the FCS_COP.1 requirements is SF10 and is specified in Section 6. 7.3.2 Specification of Security Management Functions This is an addition to the Security Management Class (FMT). The security functions that satisfy the FMT_SMF.1 requirements are SF1, SF3, and SF6. These security functions are described in Section 6. TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 61 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite Appendix A Glossary A.1 Terms Control Bytes Reserved bytes of EEPROM which can be programmed with traceability information. CRC-16 Algorithm used to compute powerful checksum on memory blocks HASH Transformation of a string of characters into a usually shorter fixed length value or key that represents the original string. IC Dedicated Software IC Proprietary software which is required for testing purposes and to implement special functions. For AT90SC6404RT this includes the embedded test software and additional test programmes which are run from outside of the IC. The Crypto libraries also form part of the IC dedicated software. 62 of 64 IC Designer Institution (or its agent) responsible for the IC Development. Atmel is the institution in respect of the TOE. IC Manufacturer Institution (or its agent) responsible for the IC manufacturing, testing and pre-personalization. Atmel is the institution in respect of the TOE. IC Packaging Manufacturer Institution (or its agent) responsible for the IC packaging and testing. IC Pre-personalization Data Required information to enable the smartcard IC to be configured by means of ROM options and to enable programming of the EEPROM with customer specified data. Integrated Circuit (IC) Electronic component(s) designed to perform processing and/or memory functions. General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) Glossary Personalizer Institution (or its agent) responsible for the smartcard personalization and final testing. Smartcard A credit sized plastic card which has a non volatile memory and a processing unit embedded within it. Smartcard Embedded Software Software embedded in the smartcard application (smartcard application software). This software is provided by smartcard embedded software developer (customer). Embedded software may be in any part of User ROM or EEPROM. Smartcard Embedded software is not applicable in the case of the TOE since it is a hardware evaluation only. Smartcard Embedded Software Developer Institution (or its agent) responsible for the smartcard embedded software development and the specification of pre-personalization requirements. Smartcard Issuer Institution (or its agent) responsible for the smartcard product delivery to the smartcard end-user. Smartcard Product Manufacturer Institution (or its agent) responsible for the smartcard product finishing process and testing. UNIX Interactive Time Sharing Operating System. TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use 63 of 64 AT90SC6404RT Security Target Lite A.2 64 of 64 Abbreviations ACSF Access Control Security Functions AVR 8-bit RISC processor developed and produced by Atmel CC Common Criteria CPU Central Processing Unit CRC Cyclic Redundancy Check DES Data Encryption Standard DPA Differential Power Analysis EEPROM Electrically Erasable Programmable ROM EKB East Kilbride HCMOS High Speed Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor I/O Input/Output IC Integrated Circuit IFCSF Information Flow Control Security Functions ISO International Standards Organization LFSR Linear Feedback Shift Register MAC Master Authentication Key MCU Microcontroller NTS North Tyneside NVM Non Volatile Memory OTP One Time Programmable PP Protection Profile RAM Random-Access Memory RFO Rousset France Operations RISC Reduced Instruction Set Core RNG Random Number Generator ROM Read-Only Memory SPA Simple Power Analysis TD Technical Data TME Test Mode Entry TOE Target of Evaluation VFO Variable Frequency Oscillator General Business Use TPG0053A (24 Nov 04) General Business Use Atmel Corporation 2325 Orchard Parkway San Jose, CA 95131, USA Tel: 1(408) 441-0311 Fax: 1(408) 487-2600 Regional Headquarters Europe Atmel Sarl Route des Arsenaux 41 Case Postale 80 CH-1705 Fribourg Switzerland Tel: (41) 26-426-5555 Fax: (41) 26-426-5500 Asia Room 1219 Chinachem Golden Plaza 77 Mody Road Tsimshatsui East Kowloon Hong Kong Tel: (852) 2721-9778 Fax: (852) 2722-1369 Japan 9F, Tonetsu Shinkawa Bldg. 1-24-8 Shinkawa Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0033 Japan Tel: (81) 3-3523-3551 Fax: (81) 3-3523-7581 Atmel Operations Memory 2325 Orchard Parkway San Jose, CA 95131, USA Tel: 1(408) 441-0311 Fax: 1(408) 436-4314 RF/Automotive Theresienstrasse 2 Postfach 3535 74025 Heilbronn, Germany Tel: (49) 71-31-67-0 Fax: (49) 71-31-67-2340 Microcontrollers 2325 Orchard Parkway San Jose, CA 95131, USA Tel: 1(408) 441-0311 Fax: 1(408) 436-4314 La Chantrerie BP 70602 44306 Nantes Cedex 3, France Tel: (33) 2-40-18-18-18 Fax: (33) 2-40-18-19-60 ASIC/ASSP/Smart Cards 1150 East Cheyenne Mtn. Blvd. Colorado Springs, CO 80906, USA Tel: 1(719) 576-3300 Fax: 1(719) 540-1759 Biometrics/Imaging/Hi-Rel MPU/ High Speed Converters/RF Datacom Avenue de Rochepleine BP 123 38521 Saint-Egreve Cedex, France Tel: (33) 4-76-58-30-00 Fax: (33) 4-76-58-34-80 Zone Industrielle 13106 Rousset Cedex, France Tel: (33) 4-42-53-60-00 Fax: (33) 4-42-53-60-01 1150 East Cheyenne Mtn. Blvd. Colorado Springs, CO 80906, USA Tel: 1(719) 576-3300 Fax: 1(719) 540-1759 Scottish Enterprise Technology Park Maxwell Building East Kilbride G75 0QR, Scotland Tel: (44) 1355-803-000 Fax: (44) 1355-242-743 Literature Requests www.atmel.com/literature Disclaimer: The information in this document is provided in connection with Atmel products. No license, express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, to any intellectual property right is granted by this document or in connection with the sale of Atmel products. EXCEPT AS SET FORTH IN ATMEL’S TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE LOCATED ON ATMEL’S WEB SITE, ATMEL ASSUMES NO LIABILITY WHATSOEVER AND DISCLAIMS ANY EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY WARRANTY RELATING TO ITS PRODUCTS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL ATMEL BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, SPECIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, OR LOSS OF INFORMATION) ARISING OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THIS DOCUMENT, EVEN IF ATMEL HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. Atmel makes no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this document and reserves the right to make changes to specifications and product descriptions at any time without notice. Atmel does not make any commitment to update the information contained herein. Unless specifically provided otherwise, Atmel products are not suitable for, and shall not be used in, automotive applications. Atmel’s products are not intended, authorized, or warranted for use as components in applications intended to support or sustain life. © Atmel Corporation 2004. All rights reserved. Atmel®, logo and combinations thereof, Everywhere You Are ® and others, are registered trademarks or trademarks of Atmel Corporation or its subsidiaries. Other terms and product names may be trademarks of others. Printed on recycled paper. TPG0053A–SMIC–24Nov04