High Density Optical Connector with Unibody Lensed Resin Ferrule Akihiro Nakama,1 Shigeo Takahashi,1 and Kazuhiro Takizawa1 The team has developed an unibody lensed resin ferrule, which is able to resolve existing multiple connector problems due to contamination. Additionally, this ferrule is interchangeable with MT ferrule, that are widely used in existing multiple optical connectors, such as MPO Connector, Back-plane Optical Connector and Optical Connector for high-definition video equipment. We evaluated the optical characteristics, environmental and mechanical reliability of the Lensed Optical Connectors. Hereinafter, multiple optical connector with lensed resin ferrule is named as Lensed Optical Connector. To show the results for insertion loss and mating durability characteristic as an example, the insertion loss of 48F multimode Lensed MPO Connector applied anti-reflection coating at 850 nm, the average and maximum loss measured are 0.36 dB and 0.76 dB respectively. For mating durability of 500 insertions without cleaning, performed remarkably with maximum loss change measured at 0.16 dB. We confirmed the optical, environmental and mechanical characteristics of Lensed Optical Connector which is obtained this time is practically possible, with exceptional mating durability characteristic, although optical performance is inferior with MT ferrule. 1. Introduction In the recent years, there is an increase in data transmission capacity along with expansion of data transfer services such as video transmission, videocalls and so on. As means to meet this requirement, multiple optical connector technologies, which is one of optical interconnection technologies that allow high-speed and high-density transmission, are introduced. To meet this increasing demand, we have developed several types of 12F, 24F and 48F optical connectors, for example MPO Connector 1), Back-plane Optical Connector 2) and Optical Connector for highdefinition video equipment 3) to accommodate consumer interest. Contamination is one of the common issues in multifiber connector, as contamination can cause poor optical performances during connections. Although multifiber connector cleaners 4) are introduced, the need of regular cleaning and difficulty in accessing target areas, such as to Back-plane Optical Connector, resulted in development of Expanded Beam Coupling technology with lens 5). This technology has attracted wide attention and several types of Lensed Optical Connector, such as grin lens type and 2-parts design type which is composed of lens parts and ferrule parts, have been developed. However, manufacturing cost of these types of Lensed Optical Connector is higher than Optical Connector with MT ferrule because of the complex 1 Fiber Optics Network Product R&D Depertment 24 manufacturing procedures. To resolve this cost issue, we have developed a 48F multimode Unibody Lensed Resin Ferrule with our high precision molding technique of MT ferrule 6), which allows more competitive advantage in cost but have difficult in high precision molding. We have confirmed the optical, mechanical and environmental reliability of Lensed MPO Connector and Lensed Backplane Connector and Lensed Optical Connector for high-definition video equipment. 2. Multiple Lensed Optical Connector 2.1 Unibody Lensed Resin Ferrule There are two ways of fiber coupling, Physical Contact Coupling and Expanded Beam Coupling (Fig.1). Physical Contact Coupling, which is used generally in existing Optical Connector, enables fiber coupling by mating both spherical polished ferrules. Expanded Beam Coupling, which is used in Lensed Optical Con- Physical Contact Coupling Pressure Ferrule Pressure Optical path Fiber Expanded Beam Coupling Ferrule Lens Expanded Beam Fig. 1. Schematic of fiber coupling method. Panel 1. Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Terms. MMF–Multi Mode Optical Fiber SMF–Single Mode Optical Fiber nector, enables fiber coupling by coupling optical paths with lenses and transmit through the air layer in between. In general, Expanded Beam Coupling has multiple advantages over Physical Contact Coupling. First, because optical paths are expanded through lens plane, Expanded Beam Coupling is less affected by contamination. Additionally, since each lens does not contact during coupling, lens plane has less tendency of being scratched by connecting and disconnecting of connector. Hence, Lensed Optical Connector is expected to have better mating durability. Furthermore, as expanded beam coupling do not need physical contact, less spring force is required for Lensed Optical Connector than for current connector which needs Physical Conntact. Fig.2 shows Unibody Lensed Resin Ferrule which is developed this time compared to existing MT ferrule. Unibody lensed resin ferrule MT ferrule Fig. 2. Unibody lensed resin ferrule. Adhesive applying portion IEC–International Electrotechnical Commission ARIB–Association of Radio Industry and Businesses Features of this Unibody Lensed Resin Ferrule are low cost, interchangeable with MT ferrule and compact size. Each feature is explaned in the following paragraphs. Low Cost Unibody Lensed Resin Ferrule that we developed has lens and fiber hole in the molded unit (Fig.3). This ferrule is produced with low cost because lens portion is molded by resin as an unibody design. The manufacturing cost for such unibody design is lower than other types of Lensed Optical Connectors because lens splicing operation of grin lens type and assembly process of 2-parts design type, such as aligning and adhering process, are not required. Moreover, UnibodyLlensed Resin Ferrule is less costly as compared with MT ferrule because end face polishing process is eliminated in the manufacturing process and part of end face geometry inspection process can also be excluded (Fig.4). Fig.4 shows the comparison between manufacturing procedures of Unibody Lensed Resin Ferrule and MT ferrule. The following process is case of Unibody Lensed Resin Ferrule. First, strip and cleave fibers. Then, insert cleaved fibers into fiber hole of ferrule and keep no gap between fiber end face and plane opposed lens. Finally, apply adhesive to adhesive applying portion and lastly, cure the adhesive to complete the manufacturing procedures. Unibody Lensed Resin Ferrule MT Ferrule 1. Strip and cleave fiber 1. Strip and cleave fiber 2. Insert cleaved fiber into Ferrule 2. Insert cleaved fiber into Ferrule 3. Apply and cure adhesive 3. Apply and cure adhesive 4. Polish ferrule end face Lens Fiber hole Fig. 3. Cross-section of unibody lensed resin ferrule. Fujikura Technical Review, 2015 5. Check ferrule end face geometry Fig. 4. Manufacturing flow chart. 25 Interchangeable with MT ferrule 2.3 Lensed Back-plane Conector The physical design of unibody lensed resin ferrule is same as the MT ferrule. Therefore, it is possible to apply Unibody Lensed Resin Ferrule to corrent connector housing for MT ferrule without any design change to housing interface. In addition, Unibody Lensed Resin Ferrule is designed to conform IEC standards, which allows mechanical compatibility with MT ferrule. It is also possible to couple optically with MT ferrule by optimizing lens parameter. In general, in order to maintain physical contacts for all mounted MT ferrules in a Back-plane Optical Connector, the connector needs high spring force. Therefore, this high spring force caused problems such as contamination due to chipping of housing latch and the need of high pushing force to connect connector. In the case of applying Unibody Lensed Resin Ferrule to Back-plane Optical Connector, the problems mentioned above cause contamination and high mating power can be resolved by employing Expanded Beam Coupling that does not require high spring force. For existing Back-plane Optical Connector, difficulty to clean connector end face using Connector Cleaner is another existing problem, this is because connector is in reccessed within the housing. Lensed Optical Connector can also resolve this problem because Expanded Beam Coupling reduces the effect of contamination. Furthermore, housing size smaller than existing Back-plane Optical Connector housing is made possible with the application of compact-size Unibody Lemsed Resin Ferrule (Fig.7). Compact size As it is impossible to apply resin with glass filler to this unibody type ferrule, molding deformation remain one of the concerns. To resolve this, we designed the compact-size Unibody Lensed Resin Ferrule. Adjustment with high-accuracy positioning between lens and fiber hole during the molding process is made possible, as compact size ferrule is more suitable for highprecision molding 6). Additionally, compact size ferrule also allows housing smaller than existing Optical Connectors to be applied. 2.2 Lensed MPO Connector Fig.5 and Fig.6 show the appearance and cross-sections of Lensed MPO Connector. Although the size of Unibody Lensed Resin Ferrule is smaller than MT ferrule, it is possible to apply Unibody Lensed Resin Ferrule to corrent MPO Connector housing only by changing the inner structure of the housing as both share similiar exterior dimenisons. Additionally, since external form of Unibody Lensed Resin Ferrule is the same as our short MT ferrule 7), it will be feasible to develope Splice-On Lensed MPO Connector 8). 2.4 L ensed Optical Connector for high-definition video equipment Optical Connector for high-definition video equipment, which is specified by ARIB standard 9), replaces electric connector that is used to connect broadcast equipments. To comply ARIB standard, this connector is requested to be insensitive to contamination and has good mating durability as compared to other Optical Connectors. Optical Connector with Unibody Lensed Resin Ferrule is expected to meet this demand (Fig.4). 3. Performance 3.1 Optical performance Insertion loss and return loss distribution at 850 nm of Lensed MPO connector, Lensed Back-plane Optical Connector and Lensed Optical Connector for highdefinition video equipment, which are applied with anti-reflection coating are shown in Fig.8 to 10, with the insertion loss mean at 0.36 dB, 0.34 dB, 0.35 dB and maximum at 0.76 dB, 0.69 dB, 0.68 dB while the Fig. 5. Lensed MPO Connector. Lensed MPO Connector Unibody lensed ferrule MPO Connector Backplane optical Connector MT ferrule Fig. 6. Cross-section of Lensed MPO connector and Current MPO connector. 26 Lensed optical back-plane Connector Fig. 7. Back-plane Optical Connector of lensed and corrent type. mean return loss at 25.5 dB, 25.7 dB, 25.8 dB and minimum at 23.5 dB, 23.6 dB, 23.6 dB respectively. In our opinion, even though the optical performances of unibody lensed resin ferrule is inferior as compared to standard MT ferrule, it is still adequate and practical for current applications. 3.2 Environmental Performance Environmental test results of Lensed MPO connector, Lensed Back-plane Optical Connector and Lensed Optical Connector for high-definition video equipment are shown in table.1 to 3. Each test condition is adhered to TIA/EIA 568 standard and we confirmed all connectors passed the relevant environmental evaluations. Lensed Optical Connector for high-definition video equipment Optical Connector for high-definition video equipment Table 1. Environmental test result of Lensed MPO Connector. Test item (Refer to TIA/EIA) Insertion Max Loss Change [dB] High Temperature 60 °C, 4 days 0.13 dB Low Temparature -10 °C, 4 days 0.15 dB Humidity 40 °C, 95 % RH, 4 days 0.09 dB Table 2. Environmental test result of Lensed Back-plane Connector. Test item (Refer to TIA/EIA) Insertion Max Loss Change [dB] High Temperature 60 °C, 4 days 0.18 dB Low Temparature -10 °C, 4 days 0.18 dB Humidity 40 °C, 95 % RH, 4 days 0.10 dB Table 3. Environmental test result of Lensed Optical Connector for high-definition video equipment. Frequency 350 Insertion Max Loss Change [dB] High Temperature 60 °C, 4 days 0.12 dB Low Temparature -10 °C, 4 days 0.09 dB Humidity 40 °C, 95 % RH, 4 days 0.06 dB 700 Insertion Loss of Lensed MPO Connector 600 300 250 N=720 fibers Ave. 0.36 dB Max 0.76 dB 200 150 Test result Test condition Frequency 400 Test result Test condition Test item (Refer to TIA/EIA) Fig. 8. Optical Connector for high-definition video equipment of lensed and existing type. Test result Test condition 500 400 N=720 fibers Ave. 25.5 dB Min. 23.5 dB 300 100 200 50 0 100 0 <0.1 <0.2 <0.3 <0.4 <0.5 <0.6 <0.7 <0.8 <0.9 <1.0 Insertion Loss [dB] Return Loss of Lensed MPO Connector <20 <22 <24 <26 <28 <30 <32 <34 <36 <38 <40 Return Loss [dB] Fig. 9. Optical performance of Lensed MPO Connector. Frequency 350 700 Insertion Loss of Lensed Back-plane Connector 300 250 N=768 fibers Ave. 0.34 dB Max 0.69 dB 200 150 600 Frequency 400 500 400 200 50 0 100 Insertion Loss [dB] N=768 fibers Ave. 25.7 dB Min. 23.6 dB 300 100 <0.1 <0.2 <0.3 <0.4 <0.5 <0.6 <0.7 <0.8 <0.9 <1.0 Return Loss of Lensed Back-plane Connector 0 <20 <22 <24 <26 <28 <30 <32 <34 <36 <38 <40 Return Loss [dB] Fig. 10. Optical performance of Lensed Back-plane connector. Fujikura Technical Review, 2015 27 400 300 250 N=720 fibers Ave. 0.35 dB Max 0.68 dB 200 150 500 400 N=720 fibers Ave. 25.8 dB Min. 23.6 dB 300 100 200 50 100 0 Return Loss of Lensed hardened fiber Connector 600 Frequency Frequency 700 Insertion Loss of Lensed hardened fiber Connector 350 0 <0.1 <0.2 <0.3 <0.4 <0.5 <0.6 <0.7 <0.8 <0.9 <1.0 Insertion Loss [dB] <20 <22 <24 <26 <28 <30 <32 <34 <36 <38 <40 Return Loss [dB] Fig. 11. Optical performance of Lensed Optical Connector for high-definition video equipment. 1.0 Table 4. Mechanical test result of Lensed MPO Connector. Test condition Insertion Loss Max Change [dB] 0.6 10-55 Hz, 3-axis, 2 h 0.07 dB Impact Test 1.5 m, 8 times 0.05 dB Pull Test 0° 2.2N, 0° 0.13 dB Test item (Refer to TIA/EIA) Vibration Test Pull Test 90° 2.2N, 90° 0.03 dB Twist Test 2.2N, ±900°, 9 times 0.02 dB Flex Test 2.2N, ±90°, 100 times 0.03 dB 500 times without cleaning 0.16 dB Mating Durability Loss increase [dB] Test result 0.8 Mating Durability 0.4 0.2 0.0 -0.2 0 -0.4 -0.6 -0.8 -1.0 100 ch1 ch4 ch7 ch10 200 300 ch2 ch5 ch8 ch11 400 500 ch3 ch6 ch9 ch12 Count Fig. 12. Mating durability test result of Lensed MPO Connector. Table 5. Mechanical test result of Lensed Back-plane Connector. Test item (Refer to Tercodia) Vibration Test Impact Test Transmission load Mating Durability Test result Test condition Insertion Loss Max Change [dB] 10-55 Hz, 3-axis, 2 h 0.05 dB 1.5 m, 8 times 0.04 dB 22N, 0° 0.10 dB 2.2N, 90° 0.08 dB 50 times with cleaning only once after test 0.12 dB are shown in table.4 to 6. Each test condition is adhered to TIA/EIA 568 and ARIB standards and we confirmed all connectors passed the relevant mechanical evaluations. Among the mechanical evaluations, the mating durability performance of lensed connectors is particularly good without cleaning during test (Fig.12). 4. Singlemode Fiber Lensed Optical Connector Table 6. Mechanical test result of Lensed Optical Connector for high-definition video equipment. Test item (Refer to ARIB standard) Vibration Test Pull Test Mating Durability Test result Test condition Insertion Loss Max Change [dB] 10-500 Hz, 3-axis, 2 h 0.04 dB 250N 0.12 dB 5000 times with cleaning only once after test 0.28 dB 3.3 Mechanical Performance Mechanical test results of Lensed MPO Connector, Lensed Back-plane Optical Connector and Lensed Optical Connector for high-definition video equipment 28 Singlemode Fiber Lensed Optical Connector is under development. For singlemode type lensed ferrule, effect for insertion loss due to misalignment between fiber core and lens is greater compare to multimode type. Additionally, it is difficult to adjust between fiber hole and lens with high precision at singlemode level for Unibody Lensed Resin Ferrule. To evaluate the effect of misalignment between fiber hole and lens on insertion loss of singlemode type lensed connector, we developed a 48F singlemode lensed ferrule with 2-parts design, MT ferrule and Lensed Resin Plate, the 2-parts design is relatively easier to align fiber core with lens as compared with unibody design. As an example, we shows the insertion loss of 48F singlemode lensed ferrule 2-parts design without anti- 60 Frequency 50 Insertion Loss of SMF Lensed Optical Connector 2-parts design without anti-refrection coating N=144 Ave. 1.60 dB Max 2.37 dB 40 30 20 10 0 solve contamination problem that is common in Multiple Optical Connectors. In addition, this Unibody Lensed Resin Ferrule enables Lensed Optical Connector to be introduced at low cost. We will improve reliability of MMF type unibody lensed resin ferrule and conduct further studies on SMF type unibody lensed resin ferrule. References .2 .4 .6 .8 .0 .2 .4 .6 .8 .0 .2 .4 .6 .8 .0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <3 Insertion Loss [dB] Fig. 13. Insertion Loss of 48F singlemode Lensed Optical Connector 2-parts design type. reflection coating in Fig.13, insertion loss mean is 1.60 dB and max insertion loss is 2.37 dB. It is expected to reduce insertion loss about 0.5 dB with application of anti-reflection coating. 5. Conclusion In this paper, we documented the development of 48 MMF unibody lensed resin ferrule. We carried out reliability test of MPO connector, Back-plane Optical Connector and Optical Connector for high-definition video equipment with Unibody Lensed Resin Ferrule and confirmed these connectors are acceptable. It is expected that the above development can re- Fujikura Technical Review, 2015 1) S.Kato, et.al : Condition for making physical contact of multi mode 2D MPO connector,59th IWCS (2010) 2) S.Kato, et.al : Compact size backplane optical connector, 61st IWCS (2012) 3) S.Kanno, et,al : Multi-fiber connector for high-definition video equipment, Fujikura Technical Review No.127 Dec.2014 4) J.Nakane, et.al : Simplex Optical Connector Cleaner, Fujikura Tecnical Review No.121 Feb.2012 5) R.J.Pimpinella, et al : Optical connectors and variable losses in coupling multimode fibers, Proceedings of 1993 IEEE. AIAA 12th Digital Avionics Systems Conference 329-335 (1993) 6) A.Nishimura et al : Development of Super Low-Loss MT-type Connector Ferrule, 59th IWCS/IICIT. 7) M.Z.Baoli ei al : Low-loss Field-installable Splice-on MPO Connector, 61st IWCS (2012) 8) Kazuhiro Takizawa, et al: Splice on Connectors : design, application and development trend, OFC2015 9) ARIB standard STD-B5, http://www.arib.or.jp/english/ html/overview/doc/2-STD-B58v1_0.pdf 29