HDSP-C8x1/C8x3 0.8” Single Digit PCB Based LED Display Data Sheet Description Features This is 0.8” height single digit display. It utilizes GaAsP/GaP Red, Orange, Yellow, Green and AlGaAs/GaAs Red chips. This device is halogenated. x High reliability All devices are categorized for luminous intensity. The orange, yellow and green devices are categorized for color. Use of similar device categories will yield a uniform display. x RoHS Compliant x Excellent characters appearance x Available in CA and CC x Gray top surface with white diffused segments. Ordering Information Red Green Yellow Orange AlGaAs Red Description HDSP-C8E1 HDSP-C8G1 HDSP-C8Y1 HDSP-C8L1 HDSP-C8A1 Common Anode, Right Hand Decimal HDSP-C8E3 HDSP-C8G3 HDSP-C8Y3 HDSP-C8L3 HDSP-C8A3 Common Cathode, Right Hand Decimal Package Dimensions Notes: 1. All dimensions are in millimeter. 2. Unless otherwise stated, the tolerance is ± 0.25mm. Circuit Diagram Absolute Maximum Ratings at TA = 25°C Parameter Symbol Red/Yellow/ Orange Green AlGaAs Red Units Power Dissipation per segment or Dot Point (DP) PD 57.5 62.5 50 mW Continuous Forward Current per segment IF 25 25 25 mA Peak Forward Current per segment (1/10 Duty Cycle, 0.1m sec pulse width) 80 80 80 mA Derating Linearly from 25°C per segment 0.33 0.33 0.33 mA/°C VR 5 V Operating Temperature TO -40 to 85 °C Storage Temperature TS -40 to 85 °C Reverse Voltage per segment or DP Wave solder Condition 1.6mm below body 2 260°C peak for 5 secs max Electrical / Optical Characteristic at TA = 25°C Red Parameter Symbol Min Typ Max Units Test Conditions Average Luminous Intensity (Digit Average) Iv – 4.8 – mcd IF = 10mA Peak Wavelength Op – 640 – nm IF = 20mA Dominant Wavelength Od – 626 – nm IF = 20mA Forward Voltage per segment or DP VF – 2.0 2.3 V IF = 20mA Reverse Current IR – – 100 PA VR = 5V Luminous Intensity Matching Ratio (Segment to Segment) Iv–M 2:1 IF = 10mA Green Parameter Symbol Min Typ Max Units Test Conditions Average Luminous Intensity (Digit Average) Iv – 5.0 – mcd IF = 10mA Peak Wavelength Op – 565 – nm IF = 20mA Dominant Wavelength Od – 569 – nm IF = 20mA Forward Voltage per segment or DP VF – 2.25 2.5 V IF = 20mA Reverse Current IR – – 100 PA VR = 5V Luminous Intensity Matching Ratio (Segment to Segment) Iv–M 2:1 IF = 10mA Yellow Parameter Symbol Min Typ Max Units Test Conditions Average Luminous Intensity (Digit Average) Iv – 3.8 – mcd IF = 10mA Peak Wavelength Op – 587 – nm IF = 20mA Dominant Wavelength Od – 589 – nm IF = 20mA Forward Voltage per segment or DP VF – 2.15 2.3 V IF = 20mA Reverse Current IR – – 100 PA VR = 5V Luminous Intensity Matching Ratio (Segment to Segment) Iv–M 3 2:1 IF = 10mA Orange Parameter Symbol Min Typ Max Units Test Conditions Average Luminous Intensity (Digit Average) Iv – 4.5 – mcd IF = 10mA Peak Wavelength Op – 610 – nm IF = 20mA Dominant Wavelength Od – 605 – nm IF = 20mA Forward Voltage per segment or DP VF – 2.15 2.3 V IF = 20mA Reverse Current IR – – 100 PA VR = 5V Luminous Intensity Matching Ratio (Segment to Segment) Iv–M 2:1 IF = 10mA AlGaAs Red Parameter Symbol Min Typ Max Units Test Conditions Average Luminous Intensity (Digit Average) Iv – 18.2 – mcd IF = 10mA Peak Wavelength Op – 660 – nm IF = 20mA Dominant Wavelength Od – 643 – nm IF = 20mA Forward Voltage per segment or DP VF – 1.85 2.0 V IF = 20mA Reverse Current IR – – 100 PA VR = 5V Luminous Intensity Matching Ratio (Segment to Segment) Iv–M 4 2:1 IF = 10mA 2.5 30 2 25 FORWARD CURRENT - mA RELATIVE LUMINOUS INTENSITY (NORMALIZED AT 10 mA) Red 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 5 10 15 20 DC FORWARD CURRENT - mA 25 30 Figure 1. Relative Luminous Intensity Vs Forward Current RELATIVE INTENSITY 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 430 480 530 580 630 WAVELENGTH - nm Figure 3. Relative Luminous Intensity Vs Wavelength 5 680 15 10 5 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 FORWARD VOLTAGE - V Figure 2. Forward Voltage Vs Current 1 0 380 20 730 780 2.5 3 3 30 2.5 25 FORWARD CURRENT - mA RELATIVE LUMINOUS INTENSITY (NORMALIZED AT 10mA) Green 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 -0.5 0 5 10 15 20 DC FORWARD CURRENT - mA 25 30 Figure 4. Relative Luminous Intensity Vs Forward Current RELATIVE INTENSITY 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 430 480 530 580 630 WAVELENGTH - nm Figure 6. Relative Luminous Intensity Vs Wavelength 6 680 15 10 5 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 FORWARD VOLTAGE - V Figure 5. Forward Voltage Vs Current 1.0 0.0 380 20 730 780 2.5 3 3.5 30 3 25 FORWARD CURRENT - mA RELATIVE LUMINOUS INTENSITY (NORMALIZED AT 10mA) Yellow 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 5 10 15 20 DC FORWARD CURRENT - mA 25 30 Figure 7. Relative Luminous Intensity Vs Forward Current RELATIVE INTENSITY 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 430 480 530 580 630 WAVELENGTH - nm Figure 9. Relative Luminous Intensity Vs Wavelength 7 680 15 10 5 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 FORWARD VOLTAGE - V Figure 8. Forward Voltage Vs Current 1 0 380 20 730 780 2.5 3 3 30 2.5 25 FORWARD CURRENT - mA RELATIVE LUMINOUS INTENSITY (NORMALIZED AT 10mA) Orange 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 5 10 15 20 DC FORWARD CURRENT - mA 25 30 Figure 10. Relative Luminous Intensity Vs Forward Current RELATIVE INTENSITY 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 430 480 530 580 630 WAVELENGTH - nm Figure 12. Relative Luminous Intensity Vs Wavelength 8 680 15 10 5 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 FORWARD VOLTAGE - V Figure 11. Forward Voltage Vs Current 1 0 380 20 730 780 2.5 3 2.5 30 2 25 FORWARD CURRENT - mA RELATIVE LUMINOUS INTENSITY (NORMALIZED AT 10mA) AlGaAs Red 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 5 10 15 20 DC FORWARD CURRENT - mA 25 30 Figure 13. Relative Luminous Intensity Vs Forward Current RELATIVE INTENSITY 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 430 480 530 580 630 WAVELENGTH - nm Figure 15. Relative Luminous Intensity Vs Wavelength 9 680 15 10 5 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 FORWARD VOLTAGE - V Figure 14. Forward Voltage Vs Current 1 0 380 20 730 780 2.5 3 Packing Tube Specifications: Tube Front View Tube Top View Reference For further information on soldering LEDs, please refer to Avago Technologies Application Note 1027. For product information and a complete list of distributors, please go to our web site: www.avagotech.com Avago, Avago Technologies, and the A logo are trademarks of Avago Technologies in the United States and other countries. Data subject to change. Copyright © 2005-2011 Avago Technologies. All rights reserved. AV02-2494EN - April 4, 2011