hs565brh tid report

Total dose testing of the HS-565BRH digital to analog converter
Nick van Vonno
Intersil Corporation
Revision 0
August 2010
Table of Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
6
7
8
9
Introduction
Reference Documents
Part Description
Test Description
4.1 Irradiation facility
4.2 Test fixturing
4.3 Characterization equipment and procedures
4.4 Experimental Matrix
4.5 Downpoints
Results
5.1 Test results
5.2 Variables data
Discussion
Conclusion
Appendices
Document revision history
1
1. Introduction
This report summarizes the results of a low and high dose rate total dose test of the HS565BRH digital to analog converter. The test was conducted in order to determine the sensitivity of
the part to the total dose environment and to low dose rate irradiation in particular.
2. Reference Documents
•
•
•
•
MIL-STD-883G test method 1019.7
MIL-PRF-38535 (QML)
HS-565BRH data sheet, Intersil document FN4607.3
DSCC Standard Microcircuit Drawing (SMD) 5962- 96755
3: Part Description
The HS-565BRH is a hardened 12-bit analog to digital converter (DAC). The part replaces the HS565ARH which is obsolete and no longer available. The monolithic chip includes a precision voltage
reference, a thin-film resistor R-2R ladder network, a reference control amplifier and twelve high-speed
bipolar current switches. The part is implemented in a dielectrically isolated process which provides latchupfree operation and minimizes parasitic capacitance and leakage currents. Ground currents are also
minimized, which produces a low and constant current through the ground terminal, reducing errors due to
code-dependent ground currents. The HS-565BRH is laser trimmed at the die level for a maximum integral
nonlinearity error of +/-0.25LSB at room temperature. In addition, the low noise on-chip buried Zener diode
reference is trimmed both for absolute value and minimum temperature coefficient.
Detailed specifications for the part are contained in SMD 5962-96755. The Intersil Web site contains
a link for downloading this drawing.
• QML Qualified per MIL-PRF-38535 requirements
• 100 krad (Si) total dose rating
• DAC and reference on a single chip
• Pin compatible with AD-565A and HI-565A
• Settles to 0.50 LSB in 500ns maximum
• Monotonicity guaranteed over temperature
• 0.50 LSB Maximum nonlinearity guaranteed over temperature
o
• Low gain drift 50ppm/ C (maximum, DAC plus reference)
• ±0.75 LSB accuracy guaranteed over temperature
2
Figure 1: HS-565BRH block diagram.
4: Test Description
4.1 Irradiation Facilities
60
High dose rate testing of the HS-565BRH was performed using a Gammacell 220 Co irradiator
located in the Palm Bay, Florida Intersil facility. Low dose rate testing was performed on a subcontract basis
at White Sands Missile Range (White Sands, NM). The use of an off-site irradiator necessitated detailed
precautions to control the packing temperature during shipment to avoid annealing effects. This was
accomplished by the use of Styrofoam shipping containers, Gelpack cold packs and miniaturized strip chart
recorders to provide a continuous temperature monitor.
The high dose rate irradiations were done at 55rad(Si)/s and the low dose rate work was performed at
.010rad(Si)/s, both per MIL-STD-883 Method 1019.7. Dosimetry for both tests was performed using Far West
Technology radiochromic dosimeters and on-site readout equipment.
4.2 Test Fixturing
Figure 2 shows the configuration used for biased irradiation in conformance with Standard Microcircuit
Drawing (SMD) 5962-96755. This configuration was used for both low and high dose rate irradiation. The
unbiased irradiation was carried out with all pins grounded.
3
Figure 2: Irradiation bias configuration for the HS-565BRH per Standard Microcircuit Drawing (SMD)
5962-96755, as used for both low and high dose rate biased irradiation.
4.3 Characterization equipment and procedures
All electrical testing was performed outside the irradiator using the production automated test
equipment (ATE) with datalogging of all parameters at each downpoint. Downpoint electrical testing was
performed at room temperature.
4
4.5 Experimental matrix
The experimental matrix consisted of four cells: five samples irradiated at high dose rate with all pins
grounded, five samples irradiated at high dose rate under bias, five samples irradiated at low dose rate with
all pins grounded and five samples irradiated at low dose rate under bias. One control unit was used. This
experimental approach was in close compliance with the guidelines of MIL-STD-883 Test Method 1019.7 for
diagnostic ELDRS testing.
Samples of the HS-565BRH were drawn from wafer 12 of production lot DPE8AK and were packaged
in the standard hermetic 24-pin ceramic flatpack (CFP) production package. Samples were processed
through the standard burnin cycle before irradiation, as required by MIL-STD-883, and were screened to the
SMD 5962-96755 limits at room, low and high temperatures before the test.
4.6 Downpoints
Downpoints for the tests were zero, 50krad(Si), 100krad(Si) and 150krad(Si) for the high dose rate test
and zero, 10krad(Si), 25krad(Si), 50krad(Si), 100krad(Si), 125krad(Si) and 150krad(Si) for the low dose rate
test.
5: Results
5.1 Test results
The low and high dose rate tests of the HS-565BRH are complete and showed no reject devices after
irradiation to 150krad(Si) at low and high dose rate), screening to the SMD post-irradiation limits.
5.2 Variables data
The plots in Figures 3 through 26 show data at all downpoints. The plots show the median of key
parameters as a function of total dose for each of the four irradiation conditions. We chose to plot the median
(as opposed to for example mean and standard deviation) because of the relatively small sample sizes
involved. All parts showed good stability over irradiation, with no observed low dose rate sensitivity. Appendix
1 summarizes key parameters of the device that have been plotted in Figures 3 – 26. Terminology is in
accordance with the applicable SMD 5962-96755. Refer to the Discussion section for further analysis.
5
Positive supply current, mA
10.0
8.0
6.0
High dose rate, unbiased
4.0
High dose rate, biased
Low dose rate, unbiased
2.0
Low dose rate, biased
0.0
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 3: HS-565BRH positive power supply current as a function of total dose irradiation at low and high dose rate.
The low dose rate was 0.01rad(Si)/s and the high dose rate was 55rad(Si)/s. Sample size for each cell was 5. The SMD
limit for this parameter is 11.8mA maximum post-irradiation.
-0.5
High dose rate, unbiased
Negative supply current, mA
-2.5
High dose rate, biased
Low dose rate, unbiased
-4.5
Low dose rate, biased
-6.5
-8.5
-10.5
-12.5
-14.5
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 4: HS-565BRH negative power supply current as a function of total dose irradiation at low and high dose rate.
The low dose rate was 0.01rad(Si)/s and the high dose rate was 55rad(Si)/s. Sample size for each cell was 5. The SMD
limit for this parameter is -14.5mA maximum post-irradiation.
6
10.100
10.080
Reference output, V
10.060
10.040
10.020
10.000
9.980
High dose rate, unbiased
9.960
High dose rate, biased
Low dose rate, unbiased
9.940
Low dose rate, biased
9.920
9.900
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 5: HS-565BRH voltage reference output voltage as a function of total dose irradiation at low and high dose rate.
The low dose rate was 0.01rad(Si)/s and the high dose rate was 55rad(Si)/s. Sample size for each cell was 5. The SMD
limits for this parameter are 9.9V to 10.1V post-irradiation.
-1.60
Unipolar output current, mA
-1.70
-1.80
-1.90
-2.00
-2.10
High dose rate, unbiased
High dose rate, biased
-2.20
Low dose rate, unbiased
-2.30
Low dose rate, biased
-2.40
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 6: HS-565BRH unipolar output current as a function of total dose irradiation at low and high dose rate. The low
dose rate was 0.01rad(Si)/s and the high dose rate was 55rad(Si)/s. Sample size for each cell was 5. The SMD limits
for this parameter are -2.4mA to -1.6mA post-irradiation.
7
-0.80
Bipolar output current, mA
-0.85
-0.90
-0.95
-1.00
-1.05
High dose rate, unbiased
High dose rate, biased
-1.10
Low dose rate, unbiased
-1.15
Low dose rate, biased
-1.20
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 7: HS-565BRH bipolar output current as a function of total dose irradiation at low and high dose rate. The low
dose rate was 0.01rad(Si)/s and the high dose rate was 55rad(Si)/s. Sample size for each cell was 5. The SMD limits
for this parameter are -1.2mA to -0.8mA post-irradiation.
Unipolar output offset error, % of FS
0.05
0.04
High dose rate, unbiased
0.03
High dose rate, biased
Low dose rate, unbiased
0.02
Low dose rate, biased
0.01
0.00
-0.01
-0.02
-0.03
-0.04
-0.05
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 8: HS-565BRH unipolar output offset error as a function of total dose irradiation at low and high dose rate. The
low dose rate was 0.01rad(Si)/s and the high dose rate was 55rad(Si)/s. Sample size for each cell was 5. The SMD
limits for this parameter are -0.05% of full scale to 0.05% of full scale post-irradiation.
8
0.25
Bipolar output offset error, % of FS
0.20
High dose rate, unbiased
High dose rate, biased
0.15
Low dose rate, unbiased
0.10
Low dose rate, biased
0.05
0.00
-0.05
-0.10
-0.15
-0.20
-0.25
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 9: HS-565BRH bipolar output offset error as a function of total dose irradiation at low and high dose rate. The
low dose rate was 0.01rad(Si)/s and the high dose rate was 55rad(Si)/s. Sample size for each cell was 5. The SMD
limits for this parameter are -0.25% of full scale to 0.25% of full scale post-irradiation.
Unipolar full scale error, % of FS
0.75
0.55
0.35
0.15
-0.05
-0.25
High dose rate, unbiased
High dose rate, biased
-0.45
Low dose rate, unbiased
-0.65
Low dose rate, biased
-0.85
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 10: HS-565BRH unipolar full scale error as a function of total dose irradiation at low and high dose rate. The low
dose rate was 0.01rad(Si)/s and the high dose rate was 55rad(Si)/s. Sample size for each cell was 5. The SMD limits
for this parameter are -0.85% of full scale to 0.85% of full scale post-irradiation.
9
Bipolar full scale error, % of FS
0.75
0.55
0.35
0.15
-0.05
-0.25
High dose rate, unbiased
High dose rate, biased
-0.45
Low dose rate, unbiased
-0.65
Low dose rate, biased
-0.85
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 11: HS-565BRH bipolar full scale error as a function of total dose irradiation at low and high dose rate. The low
dose rate was 0.01rad(Si)/s and the high dose rate was 55rad(Si)/s. The SMD limits for this parameter are -0.85% of full
scale to 0.85% of full scale post-irradiation.
0.25
Bipolar zero error, % of FS
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
-0.05
High dose rate, unbiased
-0.10
High dose rate, biased
-0.15
Low dose rate, unbiased
-0.20
Low dose rate, biased
-0.25
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 12: HS-565BRH bipolar zero error as a function of total dose irradiation at low dose rate of 0.01rad(Si)/s,
unbiased irradiation. The SMD limits for this parameter are -0.25% of full scale to 0.25% of full scale post-irradiation.
10
Digital input LOW current, bit 1, µA
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
High dose rate, unbiased
High dose rate, biased
-30
Low dose rate, unbiased
-35
Low dose rate, biased
-40
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 13: HS-565BRH digital input LOW current, bit 1, as a function of total dose irradiation at low dose rate of
0.01rad(Si)/s, biased irradiation. The SMD limit for this parameter is -40µA maximum post-irradiation.
Digital input LOW current, bit 6, µA
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
High dose rate, unbiased
High dose rate, biased
-30
Low dose rate, unbiased
-35
Low dose rate, biased
-40
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 14: HS-565BRH digital input LOW current, bit 6, as a function of total dose irradiation at low dose rate of
0.01rad(Si)/s, biased irradiation. The SMD limit for this parameter is -40µA maximum post-irradiation.
11
Digital input LOW current, bit 12, µA
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
High dose rate, unbiased
High dose rate, biased
-30
Low dose rate, unbiased
-35
Low dose rate, biased
-40
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 15: HS-565BRH digital input LOW current, bit 12, as a function of total dose irradiation at low dose rate of
0.01rad(Si)/s, biased irradiation. The SMD limit for this parameter is -40µA maximum post-irradiation.
Digital input HIGH current, bit 1, µA
1.0
0.9
High dose rate, unbiased
0.8
High dose rate, biased
Low dose rate, unbiased
0.7
Low dose rate, biased
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 16: HS-565BRH digital input HIGH current, bit 1, as a function of total dose irradiation at low dose rate of
0.01rad(Si)/s, biased irradiation. The SMD limit for this parameter is 1µA maximum post-irradiation. All four curves are
coincident with the X-axis.
12
Digital input HIGH current, bit 6, µA
1.0
0.9
High dose rate, unbiased
0.8
High dose rate, biased
Low dose rate, unbiased
0.7
Low dose rate, biased
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 17: HS-565BRH digital input HIGH current, bit 6, as a function of total dose irradiation at low dose rate of
0.01rad(Si)/s, biased irradiation. The SMD limit for this parameter is 1µA maximum post-irradiation. All four curves are
coincident with the X-axis.
Digital input HIGH current, bit 12, µA
1.0
0.9
High dose rate, unbiased
High dose rate, biased
0.8
Low dose rate, unbiased
0.7
Low dose rate, biased
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 18: HS-565BRH digital input HIGH current, bit 12, as a function of total dose irradiation at low dose rate of
0.01rad(Si)/s, biased irradiation. The SMD limit for this parameter is 1µA maximum post-irradiation. All four curves are
coincident with the X-axis.
13
Positive power supply gain sensitivity, ppm
of full scale/%∆VCC
10
9
High dose rate, unbiased
8
High dose rate, biased
Low dose rate, unbiased
7
Low dose rate, biased
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 19: HS-565BRH positive power supply gain sensitivity as a function of total dose irradiation at low and high dose
rate. The low dose rate was .01rad(Si)/s and the high dose rate was 55rad(Si)/s. Sample size for each cell was 5. The
SMD limit for this parameter is 10 ppm of full scale/%∆Vcc maximum post-irradiation.
Negative power supply gain sensitivity, ppm
of full scale/%∆VEE
25
High dose rate, unbiased
High dose rate, biased
20
Low dose rate, unbiased
Low dose rate, biased
15
10
5
0
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 20: HS-565BRH negative power supply gain sensitivity as a function of total dose irradiation at low and high
dose rate. The low dose rate was .01rad(Si)/s and the high dose rate was 55rad(Si)/s. Sample size for each cell was 5.
The SMD limit for this parameter is 25 ppm of full scale/%∆Vcc maximum post-irradiation.
14
1.0
High dose rate, unbiased
Integral nonlinearity, bit 1, LSB
0.8
High dose rate, biased
0.6
Low dose rate, unbiased
0.4
Low dose rate, biased
0.2
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1.0
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 21: HS-565BRH integral nonlinearity, bit 1, as a function of total dose irradiation at low and high dose rate. The
low dose rate was .01rad(Si)/s and the high dose rate was 55rad(Si)/s. Sample size for each cell was 5. The SMD limit
for this parameter is -1LSB to 1LSB post-irradiation.
1.0
High dose rate, unbiased
Integral nonlinearity, bit 6, LSB
0.8
High dose rate, biased
0.6
Low dose rate, unbiased
0.4
Low dose rate, biased
0.2
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1.0
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 22: HS-565BRH integral nonlinearity, bit 6, as a function of total dose irradiation at low and high dose rate. The
low dose rate was .01rad(Si)/s and the high dose rate was 55rad(Si)/s. Sample size for each cell was 5. The SMD limit
for this parameter is -1LSB to 1LSB post-irradiation.
15
1.0
High dose rate, unbiased
Integral nonlinearity, bit 12, LSB
0.8
High dose rate, biased
0.6
Low dose rate, unbiased
0.4
Low dose rate, biased
0.2
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1.0
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 23: HS-565BRH integral nonlinearity, bit 12, as a function of total dose irradiation at low and high dose rate. The
low dose rate was .01rad(Si)/s and the high dose rate was 55rad(Si)/s. Sample size for each cell was 5. The SMD limit
for this parameter is -1LSB to 1LSB post-irradiation.
1.0
High dose rate, unbiased
Differential nonlinearity, bit 1, LSB
0.8
High dose rate, biased
0.6
Low dose rate, unbiased
0.4
Low dose rate, biased
0.2
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1.0
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 24: HS-565BRH differential nonlinearity, bit 1, as a function of total dose irradiation at low and high dose rate.
The low dose rate was .01rad(Si)/s and the high dose rate was 55rad(Si)/s. Sample size for each cell was 5. The SMD
limit for this parameter is -1LSB to 1LSB post-irradiation.
16
1.0
High dose rate, unbiased
Differential nonlinearity, bit 6, LSB
0.8
High dose rate, biased
0.6
Low dose rate, unbiased
0.4
Low dose rate, biased
0.2
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1.0
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 25: HS-565BRH differential nonlinearity, bit 6, as a function of total dose irradiation at low and high dose rate.
The low dose rate was .01rad(Si)/s and the high dose rate was 55rad(Si)/s. Sample size for each cell was 5. The SMD
limit for this parameter is -1LSB to 1LSB post-irradiation.
1.0
High dose rate, unbiased
Differential nonlinearity, bit 12, LSB
0.8
High dose rate, biased
0.6
Low dose rate, unbiased
0.4
Low dose rate, biased
0.2
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1.0
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Total dose, krad(Si)
Figure 26: HS-565BRH differential nonlinearity, bit 12, as a function of total dose irradiation at low and high dose rate.
The low dose rate was .01rad(Si)/s and the high dose rate was 55rad(Si)/s. Sample size for each cell was 5. The SMD
limit for this parameter is -1LSB to 1LSB post-irradiation.
17
6: Discussion
ATE characterization of the samples at all downpoints showed no rejects tot the SMD post-irradiation
limits. The data is plotted in figures 3 to 26 and showed good stability over total dose irradiation. The HS565BRH displayed moderate low dose rate sensitivity in the reference voltage, bipolar output offset error,
unipolar full scale error and bipolar full scale error parameters. The worst-case values encountered for these
parameters were well within the applicable post-irradiation SMD limits. All other plotted parameters show little
and sometimes no difference between the high and low dose rate response. Accordingly, the part is
considered moderately low dose rate sensitive up to the 100krad(Si) data sheet total dose rating. No bias
sensitivity was noted.
7: Conclusion
This document reports the results of a total dose test of the HS-565BRH 12-bit digital to analog
converter (DAC). Samples were tested under biased and unbiased conditions to a maximum total dose of
150krad(Si) at high and low dose rate.
The HS-565BRH displayed moderate low dose rate sensitivity, notably in the reference voltage, bipolar
output offset error, unipolar full scale error and bipolar full scale error parameters. The worst-case values
encountered for these parameters were well within the applicable post-irradiation SMD limits. Accordingly, the
part is considered moderately low dose rate sensitive up to the 100krad(Si) data sheet total dose rating.
No differences between biased and unbiased irradiation were noted, and the part is not considered bias
sensitive.
18
7: Appendices
Appendix 1: Plotted parameters and limits.
Parameter
Symbol
Positive supply current
Negative supply current
Reference voltage
Unipolar output current
Bipolar output current
Unipolar output offset error
Bipolar output offset error
Unipolar full scale error
Bipolar full scale error
Bipolar zero error
Digital input LOW current, bit 1
Digital input LOW current, bit 6
Digital input LOW current, bit 12
Digital input HIGH current, bit 1
Digital input HIGH current, bit 6
Digital input HIGH current, bit 12
Positive power supply gain sensitivity
Negative power supply gain sensitivity
Integral nonlinearity, bit 1
Integral nonlinearity, bit 6
Integral nonlinearity, bit 12
Differential nonlinearity, bit 1
Differential nonlinearity, bit 6
Differential nonlinearity, bit 12
Limits
minimum
ICC
IEE
VREF_OUT
IOUT1
IOUT2
VOS
BPOE
AE
BPAE
BPZE
IIL1
IIL6
IIL12
IIH1
IIH6
IIH12
+PSS
-PSS
ILE1
ILE6
ILE12
DLE1
DLE6
DLE12
9.9
-2.4
-1.2
-0.05
-0.05
-0.85
-0.85
-0.25
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
+11.8
-14.5
10.1
-1.6
-0.8
+0.05
+0.05
+0.85
+0.85
+0.25
-40
-40
-40
1
1
1
10
25
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
Note 1: Units for these two parameters are ppm of full scale/%∆Vcc.
8: Document revision history
Revision
0
Date
August 2010
Pages
All
Comments
Original issue
19
Units
Figure
mA
mA
V
mA
mA
% FS
% FS
% FS
% FS
% FS
µA
µA
µA
µA
µA
µA
Note 1
Note 1
LSB
LSB
LSB
LSB
LSB
LSB
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
maximum