Aug 2002 High Speed Low Noise Op Amp Family Challenges Power and Distortion Assumptions with Rail-to-Rail Inputs and Output

DESIGN FEATURES
High Speed Low Noise Op Amp
Family Challenges Power and
Distortion Assumptions with Rail-to-Rail
Inputs and Output by John Wright and Glen Brisbois
Do the Math
The tradeoff is all too familiar; low
noise op amps dissipate high power.
The 1.9nV/√Hz LT6202, however,
doesn’t follow this rule. It provides
rail-to-rail input and output operation
(meaning that maximum dynamic
range can now be extracted on low
supply voltages) with a supply current of only 2.5mA. The LT6200 offers
even lower noise (0.95nV/√Hz) and
distortion, and it includes a shutdown feature for standby conditions.
These unity gain stable amplifiers are
well suited to fast low noise applications because of their respective
100MHz and 165MHz gain bandwidth,
low distortion, guaranteed noise specifications, and low offset voltage. The
amplifiers operate on a total supply
voltage of 2.5V to 12.6V, and are
fabricated on Linear Technology’s high
speed complimentary bipolar process.
All are specified with 3V, 5V, and ±5V
supplies. The single LT6202, dual
LT6203 and quad LT6204 are identical except in the number of op amps;
likewise for the single LT6200 and
dual LT6201.
The product of noise voltage and
square root of supply current, en •
√Isupply, is a useful way to gauge the
performance of fast low noise amplifiers. Amplifiers with low en have high
√ISUPPLY, and in applications that require low noise with the lowest
possible supply current, this calculation proves to be enlightening. For
example, the LT6202 has an en •
√ISUPPLY product of 3nV√mA/Hz, while
the LT6200 en • √ISUPPLY product is
only 3.9nV√mA/Hz. It is common to
see similar amplifiers with much worse
e n • √ I SUPPLY products of 4.1 to
13.2nV√mA/Hz.
An important consideration in applying the LT6200 is that noise of
0.95nV/√Hz is equivalent to the thermal noise of a 56Ω resistor. If the total
source resistance exceeds this value,
the source resistance dominates the
noise of the circuit; not the noise of
the LT6200. Figure 1 illustrates this
effect by showing the total amplifier
noise vs unbalanced source resistance. At low source resistance the
total noise is dominated by the
amplifier’s noise voltage. When source
resistance is between 56Ω and approximately 1.5kΩ, the noise is
dominated by the resistor thermal
noise. At high source resistance the
total noise is set by the product of the
amplifier noise current and the source
resistance.
In the case of the LT6202, also
shown in Figure 1, the source resistance conditions are less severe. The
noise of 1.9nV/√Hz corresponds to
the thermal noise of a 230Ω resistor.
In the region between 230Ω and approximately 20kΩ the noise is
dominated by the resistor thermal
TOTAL NOISE VOLTAGE (nV/√Hz)
100
VS = ±5V
VCM = 0V
f = 100kHz
Unbalanced RS
10
LT6202
TOTAL NOISE
LT6200
TOTAL NOISE
RESISTOR
NOISE
1
LT6200 AMPLIFIER
LT6202 AMPLIFIER NOISE VOLTAGE
NOISE VOLTAGE
0.1
10
100
1k
10k
SOURCE RESISTANCE (Ω)
100k
Figure 1. LT6200 and LT6202
total noise vs source resistance
12
noise. Beyond this resistance the noise
is set by the amplifier noise current.
Below 500Ω of unbalanced source
resistance, the LT6200 has lower total noise; above 500Ω, the LT6202
has lower total noise.
Low Noise and Low
Distortion Design
An important rule of low noise bipolar
amplifier design is that transistor
noise voltage is proportional to the
square root of the intrinsic base resistance rb, and inversely proportional
to the square root of the transistor
operating current. This means that
for low noise voltage the input transistors need to be physically large to
reduce the rb, and need to operate at
high collector currents. In other
words, halving the noise of the LT6202
requires input transistors four times
larger operating at a minimum of four
times the quiescent current, and this
is exactly how the ultra low noise
LT6200 was created. Additional current in the output stage is required to
reduce the LT6200 distortion, shown
in Figure 2, to an impressive –85dBc
–50
VS = ±5V
VO = 2VP–P
AV = 1
–60
DISTORTION (dBc)
Introduction
HD3
RL = 100Ω
–70
HD2
RL = 100Ω
–80
HD2
RL = 1k
–90
HD3
RL = 1k
–100
0.1
1
FREQUENCY (MHz)
10
Figure 2. LT6200 distortion vs
frequency
Linear Technology Magazine • August 2002
DESIGN FEATURES
+
R1
R2
I1
–
the LT6202 offset voltage shifts by
about 500µV, the gain bandwidth
drops to 50MHz, and the noise voltage has the spectrum shown in Figure
4. The inputs can common mode to
either rail, but as a practical matter
for measuring noise the inputs must
be taken a few hundred millivolts
from the rails. The PNP stage alone
has lower noise than the NPN stage
alone, and this is attributed to lower
rb of the PNP transistors.
V+
VBIAS
Q11
+V
–V
Q5
DESD1
Q6
DESD2
+
Q2
D1
D2
+V
Q3
Q1
C1
CM
+V
Q4
–
DESD3
DESD4
–V
DESD5
DIFFERENTIAL
DRIVE
GENERATOR
Q9
DESD6
Q7
Q8
+V
Q10 –V
R3
R4
I2
What about the ACs?
R5
Capacitor C1 is used to reduce the
input gm versus frequency to avoid
excess phase shift through the current mirror Q7 and Q8. This capacitor
provides a single high frequency path
to the collectors of Q6 and Q7. The
compensation capacitor CM produces
a single pole open loop response, and
lowers the AC output impedance.
There is a tradeoff between noise
and slew rate in high speed amplifiers. The commonly used technique to
obtain high slew rates is to reduce the
input stage gm by using input degeneration resistors, allowing for a
proportional reduction in the compensation capacitor. Although this
technique maintains the same gain
bandwidth and yields a direct improvement in slew rate, it also causes
a large degradation in the noise performance. For this reason, this family
uses no input gm reduction, favoring
low noise over high slew rate. The
slew rate and gain bandwidth could
D3
V–
Figure 3. LT6200-4 simplified schematic
HD2, and –95dBc HD3 at 1MHz with
RL = 100Ω.
To see how these principles are
applied, Figure 3 shows two parallel
input stages of the op amps. This
topology accomplishes several difficult tasks. First, PNP and NPN
transistors in parallel reduce the effective rb by a factor of 2 and the noise
voltage by the √2. Second, the input
stage can common mode from the
positive supply to the negative supply. The trade off between low noise
design and rail-to-rail input operation is evident in that higher collector
current in Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4 means
lower noise voltage, but it also means
a larger voltage drop across the collector loads R1, R2, R3 and R4, and
less common mode range due to satu-
ration of the input transistors. The
input referred noise benefits further
from high current in the second stage
Q5, Q6, Q7 and Q8, but unfortunately this current further reduces
the common mode range of the input
stage. The saturation of the input
transistors places an upper limit on
operating currents and therefore
amplifier noise.
When the common mode voltage is
in the middle of its range, the input
stage transconductance is set by both
input pairs. As the common mode
voltage approaches either supply, the
positive rail for instance, I1 saturates
and Q1 and Q4 cutoff. At this point
the input gm is reduced by half and is
now set by Q2 and Q3 operating currents. With half the input stage gm,
–
2k
1/2 LT1739
45
+
NOISE VOLTAGE (nV/√Hz)
40
VCM = 0.5V
PNPs ON
35
1k
49.9Ω
VS = 5V, 0V
TA = 25V
RS = 0W
–
1/2 LT6203
1:1
30
VCM = 4.5V
NPNs ON
25
VD
LINE
DRIVER
20
VL
100Ω
LINE
•
+
•
VR
LINE
RECEIVER
+
15
1/2 LT6203
10
5
0
1k
VCM = 0V
NPNs & PNPs ON
10
100
1k
10k
FREQUENCY (Hz)
+
100k
Figure 4. LT6202 noise voltage
vs frequency
Linear Technology Magazine • August 2002
1/2 LT1739
–
–
49.9Ω
1k
1k
2k
Figure 5. Low noise 4- to 2-wire local echo cancellation differential recieiver
13
DESIGN FEATURES
Applications
5.0
4.5
Low Noise 4-Wire to 2-Wire
Local Echo Cancellation
Differential Receiver
INTEGRATED NOISE (µVRMS)
also have been increased by reducing
the compensation capacitor, resulting in the amplifier being stable only
at closed loop gains >1. One reason,
however, for making the amplifiers
unity gain stable is to allow the closed
loop gain to be rolled off with a feedback capacitor to further reduce the
noise by limiting the bandwidth.
The LT6202 can drive capacitive
loads as high as 100pF, while the
faster LT6200 can drive 30pF. Table 1
shows a performance summary for
both families.
Figure 5 shows a low noise 4-wire to
2-wire local echo cancellation differential receiver. With the LT1739
drivers in shutdown, the resulting
noise is that of the LT6203 alone. The
total integrated noise of the differential receiver is shown in Figure 6 from
25kHz to 150kHz.
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0
0
20
40
60 80 100 120 140 160
BANDWIDTH (kHz)
Figure 6. Line receiver integrated
noise 25kHz to 150kHz
Table 1. LT6203/LT6204 Performance: TA = 25°C, VS = 5V, 0V unless otherwise specified.
LT6200/LT6201
Parameter
Offset Voltage
Conditions
Min
Typ
Max
VCM = VS/2
100
VCM = V+ to V–
Typ
Max
Units
1000
100
500
µV
0.6
2.0
0.8
2.0
mV
10
40
1.3
7.0
µA
f = 10kHz, VS = ±5V
1.4
2.3
2.8
4.5
nV/√Hz
f = 100kHz, VS = ±5V
0.95
1.9
nV/√Hz
Balanced RS
2.2
0.75
pA/√Hz
Unbalanced RS
3.5
1.1
pA/√Hz
Input Bias Current
Noise Voltage
Noise Current
Large Signal Gain
Common Mode Rejection Ratio
LT6202/LT6203/LT6204
f = 10kHz
Min
VO = 0.5V to 4.5V,
RL=1k to VS/2
40
70
70
120
V/mV
VO = 1V to 4V,
RL=100Ω to VS/2
11
18
8
14
V/mV
VCM = V+ to V–
65
90
60
83
dB
VOUT Low
ISINK = 20mA
150
290
240
460
mV
VOUT High
ISOURCE = 20mA
220
400
325
600
mV
Supply Current
Per amplifier
16.5
19
2.5
3
mA
Disabled Supply Current
VSHDN = 0.3V
1.3
1.8
NA
mA
Gain Bandwidth Product
VS = –5V, f = 1MHz
165
100
MHz
35
V/µs
Slew Rate
Distortion
14
AV = –1, RL=1kΩ,
VO = 4V
AV = 1,
1MHz,
VO = 2VP–P
35
50
17
HD2, RL= 100Ω
–85
dBc
HD3, RL= 100Ω
–95
dBc
HD2, RL= 1k
–81
dBc
HD3, RL= 1k
–81
dBc
Linear Technology Magazine • August 2002
DESIGN FEATURES
CF
5V
Single Supply, 1.5nV/√Hz,
Photodiode Amplifier
Figure 7 shows a simple, fast, low
noise photodiode amplifier. Feedback
forces the BF862 JFET source to 2.5V,
which causes the drain current to be
2.5mA. At this current, the VGS of the
JFET is about –0.5V, so the gate and
output voltage both sit at about 2V
DC and the photodiode sees 2V of
reverse bias. Under illumination, the
gate stays at constant DC voltage
while the op amp output rises by IPD
• RF, giving the transfer function VOUT
= 2V + IPD • RF.
Amplifier input noise density and
gain-bandwidth product were measured to be 1.5nV/√Hz and 157MHz,
respectively, while consuming only
100mW. The reason the 165MHz gain
bandwidth product of the LT6200 is
not severely compromised by this composite circuit is that the JFET has a
high gm, approximately 1/50Ω, and
looks into 1kΩ so loop attenuation is
only 5%. Total circuit input capacitance including board parasitics was
measured to be 3.2pF. This is less
than the specified CGS of the JFET,
because the JFET source is not
grounded but rather looks into R3
and the high impedance op amp input. This fact combined with the low
input voltage noise makes the circuit
well suited to both large and small
photodetectors. The unity-gain sta-
IPD
PHILIPS
BF862
PHOTO
DIODE
R1
10k
R3
1k
RF
–
+
VOUT ≈ 2V
+IPD • RF
LT6200
(MAY GROUND
OR TAKE TO
NEGATIVE VDC)
R2
10k
0.1µF
Figure 7. Single supply, 1.5nV/√Hz, photodiode amplifier
bility and ultralow bias current of the
circuit means that the transimpedance gain, set by RF, can be any value
from 10Ω to 10GΩ.
The circuit was tested using a small
2.5pF Advanced Photonix avalanche
photodiode #012-70-62-541 reverse
biased to –180V, and a 210kΩ feedback resistor RF. This photodiode
was selected for its speed, so that its
inherent response would not impact
Available Packages
LT6200: SOT-23-6
LT6201: SO-8
LT6202: SOT-23-5
LT6203: SO-8
LT6204: SO-14
SO-8
MSOP-8
SO-8
MSOP-8
SSOP-16
the circuit bandwidth measurement.
With feedback capacitance adjusted
for 4% overshoot, closed loop bandwidth was measured to be 4.5MHz.
This is in good agreement with theory
given the ~5.7pF total input C and the
210kΩ transimpedance gain: 5.7pF
is 6.2kΩ at 4.5MHz, for a noise gain of
210k/6.2k = 35, and a GBW product
of 35 • 4.5MHz = 157MHz.
Conclusion
Linear Technology’s new family of low
noise op amps operate rail-to-rail input and output while maintaining a
light appetite for supply current. This
combination is accomplished without sacrificing AC or DC performance.
The family is available in singles,
duals and quads and in a wide variety
of packages.
LTC4255, continued from page 11
the disconnect timer runs out, the
port power is turned off and the corresponding status bit is set. The
LTC4255 monitors the DC component of the Power Maintenance
Signature only; additional circuitry is
needed to monitor the AC component
of the signature if required by the
application.
Conclusion
The LTC4255 provides complete power
control circuitry to switch 48V onto
Ethernet wires, greatly simplifying
the design of the power path of PSE
devices. An LTC4255, together with a
standard quad PHY chip, a detection/classification circuit, and a
handful of external components make
four complete powered Ethernet ports.
Fault protection, startup control, and
disconnect sensing are all performed
by the LTC4255, minimizing external
circuitry. The I2C interface simplifies
monitoring and control of the
LTC4255 by a host system.
Part 2 of this series will cover the
details of PD design and show how to
put together the power receiving end
of the link.
Notes
1
The 802.3af standard is still in draft form, and
parts of the standard are still in flux. No product
can yet claim full compliance, but compatible
products are already available in advance of the
final standard. For the latest information on the
state of the 802.3af standard or on LTC products
designed to meet the standard, contact the LTC
Applications department.
For more information on parts featured in this issue, see
http://www.linear.com/go/ltmag
Linear Technology Magazine • August 2002
15