AND8392/D A 800 W Bridgeless PFC Stage www.onsemi.com APPLICATION NOTE Bridgeless PFC is one of the options to meet these new requirements. The main goal of this paper is to present a bridgeless solution that is relatively easy to implement in the sense that it does not require any specific controller and the operation remains very similar to that of a conventional PFC. The solution is illustrated by a 800 W, wide mains application driven by the NCP1653. Environmental concerns lead to new efficiency requirements when designing modern power supplies. For instance, the 80 plus initiative and moreover its bronze, silver and gold derivatives force desktops and servers manufacturers to work on innovative solutions. An important focus is on the PFC stage that with the EMI filter can be easily consume 5% to 8% of the output power at low line, full load. Why remove the bridge? D1 D2 + AC Line EMI Filter PFC Stage + D3 D4 Figure 1. The Input Current Flows Through Two Diodes Figure 1 portrays the diodes bridge that is usually inserted between the EMI filter and the PFC stage. This bridge rectifies the line voltage to feed the PFC stage with a rectified sinusoid input voltage. It is well known that as a result of this structure, the input current must flow through two diodes before being processed by the PFC boost: ♦ For one line half−wave, D1 and D4 conduct (red arrows of Figure 1) ♦ For the other one, D2 and D3 convey the current (blue arrows of Figure 1) As a matter of fact, two diodes of the bridge are permanently inserted in the current path. Unfortunately, these components exhibit a forward voltage that leads to conduction losses. The mean value of the current seen by the bridge is the line average current. Hence we can write the following equation: © Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC, 2015 February, 2015 − Rev. 1 ǂIbridgeǃ T + ǂI line(t)ǃ line T + line 2 Ǹ2 @ I line(rms) p (eq. 1) The line rms current can be easily expressed as a function of the power and of the line voltage: I line(rms) + P out h @ V in(rms) (eq. 2) Where: • Pout is the output power • h is the efficiency • Vin(rms) is the rms line voltage 1 Publication Order Number: AND8392/D AND8392/D Since two diodes permanently see the average line current, the bridge consumes a power that can be computed as follows: In other words, an input bridge consumes about 2% of the input power at low line of a wide mains application. Hence, if one of the series diodes could be suppressed, 1% of the input power could be saved and the efficiency could for instance, rise from 94% to 95%. Also, the major hot spot produced by a traditional diodes bridge would be eliminated at the benefit of an improved reliability of the application. Here are the motivations behind the bridgeless approach. 2 Ǹ2 @ P out (eq. 3) P bridge + 2 @ V f @ I bridge ^ 2 @ Vf @ T h @ p @ V in(rms) line ǂ ǃ Finally, if we assume a 1 V forward voltage per diode and computing the losses at the usual low line rms voltage (90 V), it comes: P bridge ^ 2 @ 1 @ 2 Ǹ2 @ P out h @ p @ 90 ^ 2% @ P out (eq. 4) h ”Basic” Bridgeless Architecture Switching cell when PH2 is high M1 is Off D1 PH1 D2 L AC Line PH2 + M1 M2 Switching cell when PH1 is high M2 is Off Figure 2. ”Traditional” Bridgeless Solution The line (Note 1) and the PFC inductor are placed in series and the arrangement they form is connected to the switching nodes of the two switching cells. Figures 3 and 4 show the functioning of the bridgeless PFC when the ”PH1” is high. Figure 5 summarizes the operation for the other half−line cycle. Figure 2 portrays a classical option for bridgeless PFC. They are two switching cells. Each of them consists of a power MOSFET and of a diode: ♦ The first cell (M1, D1) processes the power for the half−line cycle when the terminal ”PH1” of the line is high and is in idle mode for the rest of the line period. ♦ The second cell (M2, D2) is active for the other half−wave when ”PH1” is low compared to terminal ”PH2”. 1. The EMI filter is not represented for the sake of simplicity. www.onsemi.com 2 AND8392/D D1 PH1 Ac Line M2 Body Diode PH2 + M1 Figure 3. MOSFET Conduction Phase (”PH1” Half−Wave) D1 PH1 Ac Line M2 Body Diode PH2 + M1 Figure 4. Current Path When the MOSFET is Open (”PH1” Half−Wave) M2 is On: Conduction Time M1 is Open: Off Time D2 PH1 Ac Line PH2 M2 M1 Body Diode Figure 5. Operation for the Line Half−Wave when ”PH2” is High www.onsemi.com 3 + AND8392/D ”dV/dt” leads to an increased common−mode noise that is difficult to filter. This is probably the major drawback of the solution ([1] and [2]). An improvement consists in splitting the inductor into two smaller ones and to insert one of them between one line terminal and the switching node of cell 1 and the other one between the second line terminal and the switching node of cell 2. Doing so, the large aforementioned ”dV/dt” is no more directly applied to the input terminals and thus, the line potentials can be more stable with respect to the board ground. However, such a solution still exhibits a worse signature in the high frequency part of the spectrum. As sketched by Figures 3 to 5, the input current is processed by the switching cell that is active for the considered line half−wave. The MOSFET of the inactive cell has a role anyway, since its body diode serves as the current return path. Compared to a conventional PFC stage, the losses due to the bridge are saved but the body diode of the inactive MOSFET conveys the coil current. Finally, this structure eliminates the voltage drop of one diode in the line−current path for an improved efficiency. However, the presented architecture presents several inconveniences that actually, result from the fact that the line is not referenced to the ground as it is the case in a conventional PFC. Instead, in this structure, the line is floating compared to the PFC stage ground, leading to the following difficulties: ♦ Certain PFC controllers need to sense the input voltage. In this structure, a simple circuitry cannot do the job. ♦ Similarly, the coil current cannot be easily monitored. Besides these difficulties in the circuit implementation, EMI filtering is the main issue. When ”PH1” is high, the negative terminal ”PH2” is attached to ground by the M2 body diode. Hence, the application ground is connected to ac line as it happens in a conventional PFC. Now, when ”PH2” is high, the MOSFET M2 switches and the voltage between the line terminals and the application ground pulses as well. More specifically, the potential of the ”PH2” node nearly oscillates between 0 (when the MOSFET on) and the PFC output voltage (when the MOSFET is off). This large Figure 6 portrays another option for bridgeless PFC. This solution was proposed by Professors Alexandre Ferrari de Souza and Ivo Barbi ([3]). As shown by Figure 6, there is no full bridge. Instead, the ground of the PFC circuit is linked to the line by diodes D1 and D2 and each terminal feeds a PFC stage. Hence, the solution could be viewed as 2−phase PFC where the two branches operate in parallel: ♦ For the half−wave when the terminal ”PH1” of the line is high, diode D1 is off and D2 connects the PFC ground to the negative line terminal (”PH2”). D2 grounds the input of the ”PH2 PFC stage” branch that thus, is inactive and the ”PH1 PFC stage” processes the power. ♦ For the second half−line cycle (when ”PH2” is high), the ”PH2 PFC stage” branch is operating and ”PH1 PFC stage” that has no input voltage, is inactive. “PH1” PFC Stage PH1 + Ac Line 2−Phase Approach “PH2” PFC Stage PH2 DRV D2 + D1 Figure 6. 2−Phase Architecture Figure 7 gives an equivalent schematic for the two half−waves. Similarly to the traditional bridgeless structure presented in the previous paragraph, this architecture eliminates one diode in the current path and hence improves the efficiency. Another interesting characteristic of this structure is that the PFC stage that is active, behaves as a conventional PFC boost would do: ♦ When the ”PH1” terminal is positive (see Figure 7a), diode D1 opens and D2 offers the return ♦ path. The input voltage for the ”PH1” PFC stage is a rectified sinusoid referenced to ground. For the other half−wave (see Figure 7b), when ”PH2” is the positive terminal, D1 offers the return path. Diode D2 is off and sees a rectified sinusoid that inputs the ”PH2” PFC stage. Again, we have a conventional PFC where the input voltage and the boost are traditionally referenced to ground. www.onsemi.com 4 AND8392/D PH1 PFC Stage + PH1 − PH1 PH2 PFC Stage Ac Line AC Line PH2 + DRV − PH2 + D1 D2 + DRV b) terminal PH2 is the high one a) Terminal PH1 is the High One Figure 7. Equivalent Schematic for the Two Half−Waves It is also worth noting that the 2−phase structure does not require any specific controller. The MOSFETs of the two branches are referenced to ground and they can be permanently driven even when their phase in idle phase. The MOSFET of the inactive branch would then be turned on and off useless but: ♦ At the benefit of a simplified circuitry since there is no need for detecting the active phase and for PH1 Ac Line ♦ directing the drive signal to the right MOSFET according to the half−line cycle. At the price of the additional losses due to the inactive MOSFET drive. The loss is not very high anyway since the voltage across the MOSFET is null when its input voltage is zero. Hence, the gate charge to be provided is approximately halved compared to that of the active MOSFET. 0V PH2 DRV D2 D1 + Rsense Figure 8. Operation for the ”PH2” Half−Wave Actually, a large portion of the current flows as indicated in black. This is because the body diode of the supposedly inactive MOSFET provides the current with another path. The coil exhibiting a low impedance at the line frequency, we have two diodes in parallel and the current share between them. One should however note that the current does not necessary return by the D1 and D2 diodes. Figure 8 portrays the ”expected” current path when ”PH2” is high (the same analysis could have been done for ”PH1” high): ♦ The blue path is supposed to be the current path when the MOSFET is on ♦ The red one, that of the current when the MOSFET is open. www.onsemi.com 5 AND8392/D 5 ms/div Phase 1 current (5 A/div) 0A Part of the active phase current flows through the inactive MOSFET and coil! 0A Phase 2 current (5 A/div) Figure 9. Part of the Current Flows through the Supposedly Inactive MOSFET and Coil Figure 9 portrays the input current for each branch. One can see on this plot that a negative current takes place through the body diode during the ”inactive” half−wave. The main inconvenience of this behavior is that the input current cannot be sensed by inserting a RSENSE resistor in the supposed return path (as shown by Figure 8) since part of current takes another road. That is why current sense transformers can be of great help to measure the current in such a structure. Implementation of the Bridgeless PFC Figure 10 highlights the main parts of our 800 W prototype. Branch 1 PH1 Current sense transformer AC Line + Bulk Capacitor EMI Filter Branch 2 PH2 Return Path Diodes D2 D1 FB VCC 2 3 4 RETURN D3 1N5406 8 NCP1653 1 Current sense transformer 7 6 5 In−rush current detection (optional) RSense RETURN Input voltage sensing CS One control circuitry Figure 10. Simplified Application Schematic Input Voltage Sensing Branch 1 and Branch 2 PFC Boost: The NCP1653 monitors the input voltage for feed−forward purpose. The NCP1654 further features a brown−out protection. As shown by Figure 10, two small diodes (e.g. 1N4007) are used that re−construct the rectified line voltage that can then be monitored by the circuit. Two PFC boost converters are to be designed. This application note does not focus on the dimensioning of the power components since it is relatively traditional. However, the fact that each branch is active for one half−line cycle only, improves the heating distribution. Also, the rms current being halved in each branch, the power components does not need to be as large as those of a conventional PFC. www.onsemi.com 6 AND8392/D Inrush Detection Control Circuitry Instead of a third current sense transformer, we made the choice to keep a current sense resistor to monitor the current that re−fuels the buck capacitor, i.e.: ♦ In−rush currents during the start−up phase or in over−load situations ♦ The current provided by the boost diodes in normal operation Due to that, the MOSFET and the input bridge are referenced to the ”RETURN” potential instead of ground. The voltage between the RETURN and ground potentials is the negative voltage engendered by the RSENSE resistor. If this voltage becomes too large (during in−rush sequences for instance), the MOSFETs’ source potential may dramatically drop and some accidental MOSFET turn on may follow. That is why the voltage across the RSENSE resistor is limited by a diode. This diode must be able to sustain the in−rush current and its forward voltage must high enough so that the RSENSE voltage is not clamped until the current largely exceeds its permissible level in normal operation. Otherwise, the clamping diode would prevent the RSENSE voltage from becoming high enough to trigger the over−current protection. As already mentioned, the 2−phase bridgeless PFC does not require any complex control circuitry. The NCP1653 PFC controller directly drives the two branches. The NCP1653 is a compact 8−pin PFC controller that operates in continuous conduction mode. As it directly adjusts the conduction time as a function of the coil current, there is no inner current loop to be compensated for an eased design. Housed in a DIP8 or SO8 package and available in two frequency versions (67 kHz or 100 kHz), the NCP1653 integrates all the features necessary for a compact and rugged PFC stage including a current sensing technique that allows the use of very low impedance, current sense resistors for reduced losses and a significant improvement of the efficiency. Compared to traditional solutions, the efficiency increase can be as high as almost 1%. The NCP1654 is a NCP1653 derivative that further incorporates a brown−out detection block to disable the PFC stage when the line magnitude is too low. Also, the voltage regulation is made more accurate and a dynamic response enhancer dramatically minimizes the large deviation of the output voltage that a sharp line/load step could otherwise produce (see [4] and [5]). www.onsemi.com 7 www.onsemi.com 8 C13 1 μF Type = X2 CM1 CM2 Figure 11. Application Schematic F1 10 A 30 N 36 R32 680k R31 680k R30 680k C14 1 μF Type = X2 40 Earth 37 42 90 to 265 Vrms 50 or 60 Hz line voltage L 39 43 49 C18 4.7 nF Type = Y2 C19 4.7 nF Type = Y2 C15 1μF Type = X2 C1 100nF / 63V 10 CS 5 R8 2.2k R3 470k R2 2700k 27 R1 2200k D3 1N4007 PH1 RETURN D1 PH2 PH2 R4 2.2k RETURN 3 D4 1N4007 PH2 D10 1N5817 C2 100nF C3 220nF D2 R5 390 R6 100k 28 C5 10nF 1 3 4 D5 1N5406 12 13 15 2 24 NCP1653 Vm 5 Gnd 6 In CS Drv 7 Vcc 8 Vctrl FB U1 NCP1653 R14 390k 1 6 R15 680k R7 56k Vcc R13 10 R16 680k C4 1nF R12 100 C25 22μF 23 R17 180k C6 22μF C24 220nF 51 C27 100pF 53 4 3 2 1 C28 220nF Vcc2 NC 8 OutB 5 Vcc 7 R11 100m / 3W R10 100m / 3W R9 100m / 3W MC33152 InB Gnd InA OutA 7 NC RETURN DRV2 DRV1 Vcc2 PH2 R23 10k R22 10 L2 0.2m R28 15k Q3 SPP20N60 2 33 RETURN 20 R26 15k Q1 SPP20N60 7 4 RETURN 9 C17 1μF R19 10k R18 10 RETURN DRV1 C16 1μF L1 0.2m D8 1N4148 D9 1N4148 C11 330u / 450 V DRV2 32 DRV1 31 CS 21 R25 10k R24 10 R29 3 CS R21 10k R20 10 R27 3 Q2 SPP20N60 22 C12 330u / 450 V Q4 SPP20N60 D7 CSD10060 26 D6 CSD10060 AND8392/D AND8392/D NCP1653 And MC33152 MOSFET driver Bulk converter to generate the Vcc voltage (NCP1012) Figure 12. Photograph of the Evaluation Board ♦ Main components of the board: ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Input diodes: one GSIB1580 from Vishay (15−A, 800−V). This diodes bridge has actually been implemented to provide return−path diodes D1 and D2 of Figure 10. Using a diodes bridge helps have the two input diodes cooled down by the board heatsink. Current sense transformers (1 per branch): WCM601−2 from West Coast Magnetics (20 A, 50 turns) Boost diodes (1 per branch): CSD10060 (10 A, 600 V SiC diode from CREE) Power MOSFETs (2 per branch): SPP20N60 from Infineon (20 A, 600−V, 0.19 W) ♦ Inductors (1 per branch): 200 mH / 9.7 Arms / 16 Apk / 5 App coil (ferrite core) Part Name: PFC−Choke LDU80025 Part Number: 203860 Producer: www.J−Lasslop.de, Information: Info@J−Lasslop.de Controller (only 1 for the application): NCP1653: 100 kHz, 8−pin, Continuous Conduction Mode PFC that can be easily replaced by its NCP1654 derivative that further features a brown−out protection and a dynamic response enhancer (see [4] and [5]). www.onsemi.com 9 AND8392/D Performance of the 800−W board − Typical Waveforms 90 Vrms Iline (10 A/div) 230 Vrms Iline (10 A/div) Vout Vout CS (negative sensing) CS (negative sensing) Vin,1 (input voltage for branch 1) Vin,1 Figure 13. Typical Waveforms at Low Line (Left) and High Line (Right) ”Vsense” (identical to ”CS”) is a negative representation of the MOSFET current. The current sense transformers are wired so that only the current drawn by the MOSFET drain is monitored (possible current flowing in the opposite direction cannot be sensed). The waveforms are similar to those of a traditional CCM PFC. Plots Figure 13 of portray typical waveforms at full load (Iout = 2.1 A). ”CS” is the negative voltage provided by the current sense transformers. It is representative of the current flowing into the MOSFETs of the two branches (”CS” is the common output of the two current sense transformers). As expected, the input voltage of the ”PH1 PFC stage” (”Vin,1”) is a rectified sinusoid for one half−line cycle and null for the other one. The line current is properly shaped. Figure 14 provides a magnified view at the top of the line sinusoid. The switching frequency is 100 kHz. The signal 230 Vrms rms 90 Vrms rms Iline (10 A/div) Iline (10 A/div) Vout Vout Vin,1 Vsense (negative sensing) Vsense (negative sensing) Vin,1 (input voltage for branch 1) Figure 14. Magnified Views of Figure 13 Plots Thermal Measurements Measurement Conditions: The following results were obtained using a thermal camera, after a 1/2 h operation. The board was operating at a 25°C ambient temperature, without a fan. These data are indicative. For the bridge used to provide return−path diodes D1 and D2 of Figure 10, the MOSFETs and the boost diodes, the measures were actually made on the heat−sink as near as possible of the components of interest. Vin(rms) = 88 V Pin(avg)) = 814 W Vout = 381 V I out = 2 A PF = 0.995 THD = 9 % www.onsemi.com 10 AND8392/D Bridge MOSFET1 Diode1 Devices Temperature (5C) 85 95 Coil1 MOSFET2 Diode2 Coil2 Bulk Capacitor CM EMI coil 47 86 80 48 40 45 77 Efficiency and Total Harmonic Distortion 100 20 230 Vrms 98 90 Vrms 96 THD (%) EFFICIENCY (%) 15 120 Vrms 90 Vrms 94 90 100 200 20% Pmax 300 400 500 600 700 OUTPUT POWER (W) 0 100 800 Pmax 300 400 500 600 OUTPUT POWER (W) 700 800 900 Pmax Figure 16 portrays the THD at 90, 120 and 230 Vrms over the load. One can note that the total harmonic distortion remains very low even in high line, light load (< 15%) where the line current is small and more sensitive to all the sources of distortion like the system inaccuracies and mainly the EMI filter. Conclusion A bridgeless PFC based on the 2−phase architecture has several merits among which one can list the ease of control or the absence of high frequency noise injected to the line (eased EMI). The paper presents the performance of a prototype controlled by the NCP1653 (100 kHz version). The NCP1654 that further incorporates the brown−out protection and a dynamic response enhancer could be implemented as well. The prototype has been tested at full load (800 W output) without a fan (open frame, ambient temperature). In these conditions, the full−load efficiency was measured in the range of 94% at 90 Vrms and as high as 95% at 100 Vrms. The THD remains very low. A NCP1653 or NCP1654 driven 2−phase bridgeless PFC is a solution of choice for very efficient, high power applications. More information on this bridgeless architecture can be found in [6]. P in(avg) + V in(rms) @ I in(rms) @ PF Open Frame, Ambient Temperature, No Fan To the light of Figure 15, we can note that: ♦ Like in a conventional PFC, the efficiency is higher at high line. In fact, this is because as in any boost, ♦ 200 20% Pmax Figure 15 portrays the efficiency over the line range, from 20% to 100% of the load. The efficiency was measured in the following conditions: ♦ The measurements were made after the board was 30 mn operated full load, low line ♦ All the measurements were made consecutively without interruptions ♦ PF, THD, Iin(rms) were measured by a power meter PM1200 ♦ Vin(rms) was measured directly at the input of the board by a HP 34401A multi−meter ♦ Vout was measured by a HP 34401A multi−meter ♦ The input power was computed according to: the losses are reduced when the ratio 120 Vrms Figure 16. Total Harmonic Distortion Over the Load Range Figure 15. Efficiency Performance ♦ 230 Vrms 5 92 ♦ 10 ǒ Ǔ is V in(t) V out high (close to 1). At low line (90 Vrms), full load, the efficiency is in the range of 94% without a fan. It was even measured that @ 100 Vrms, we reach 95% at full load. We can note that the efficiency is high at light load. For instance, at 20% of full load, efficiency is in the range or higher than 96%. www.onsemi.com 11 AND8392/D References 4. NCP1653 data sheet and application notes, www.onsemi.com 5. NCP1654 data sheet and application notes, www.onsemi.com 6. Joel Turchi, “A High−Efficiency, 300−W Bridgeless PFC Stage”, Application Note AND8481/D, http://www.onsemi.com/pub_link/Collateral/AND 8481−D.PDF 1. Laszlo Huber, Yungtaek Jang and Milan M. Jovanovic, ”Performance Evaluation of Bridgeless PFC Boost Rectifiers”, APEC 2007 2. Pengju Kong, Shuo Wang, and Fred C. Lee, ”Common Mode EMI Noise Suppression for Bridgeless PFC Converters” 3. Alexandre Ferrari de Souza and Ivo Barbi, ”High Power Factor Rectifier with Reduced Conduction and Commutation Losses”, Intelec, 1999 ON Semiconductor and the are registered trademarks of Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC (SCILLC) or its subsidiaries in the United States and/or other countries. SCILLC owns the rights to a number of patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, and other intellectual property. A listing of SCILLC’s product/patent coverage may be accessed at www.onsemi.com/site/pdf/Patent−Marking.pdf. SCILLC reserves the right to make changes without further notice to any products herein. SCILLC makes no warranty, representation or guarantee regarding the suitability of its products for any particular purpose, nor does SCILLC assume any liability arising out of the application or use of any product or circuit, and specifically disclaims any and all liability, including without limitation special, consequential or incidental damages. “Typical” parameters which may be provided in SCILLC data sheets and/or specifications can and do vary in different applications and actual performance may vary over time. All operating parameters, including “Typicals” must be validated for each customer application by customer’s technical experts. SCILLC does not convey any license under its patent rights nor the rights of others. SCILLC products are not designed, intended, or authorized for use as components in systems intended for surgical implant into the body, or other applications intended to support or sustain life, or for any other application in which the failure of the SCILLC product could create a situation where personal injury or death may occur. Should Buyer purchase or use SCILLC products for any such unintended or unauthorized application, Buyer shall indemnify and hold SCILLC and its officers, employees, subsidiaries, affiliates, and distributors harmless against all claims, costs, damages, and expenses, and reasonable attorney fees arising out of, directly or indirectly, any claim of personal injury or death associated with such unintended or unauthorized use, even if such claim alleges that SCILLC was negligent regarding the design or manufacture of the part. SCILLC is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer. This literature is subject to all applicable copyright laws and is not for resale in any manner. PUBLICATION ORDERING INFORMATION LITERATURE FULFILLMENT: Literature Distribution Center for ON Semiconductor P.O. Box 5163, Denver, Colorado 80217 USA Phone: 303−675−2175 or 800−344−3860 Toll Free USA/Canada Fax: 303−675−2176 or 800−344−3867 Toll Free USA/Canada Email: [email protected] N. American Technical Support: 800−282−9855 Toll Free USA/Canada Europe, Middle East and Africa Technical Support: Phone: 421 33 790 2910 Japan Customer Focus Center Phone: 81−3−5817−1050 www.onsemi.com 12 ON Semiconductor Website: www.onsemi.com Order Literature: http://www.onsemi.com/orderlit For additional information, please contact your local Sales Representative AND8392/D