RH1011 - SPEC NO. 05-08-5012

SPEC NO. 05-08-5012 REV. M
RH1011, VOLTAGE COMPARATOR
REVISION RECORD
DESCRIPTION
REV
DATE
0
INITIAL RELEASE
06/12/96
A
•
•
•
•
•
PAGE 2, ADDED PARAGRAPHS 3.2.1, 3.2.2, AND 3.2.3.
PAGE 2, PARAGRAPH 3.3.b: ADDED “(SEE PARAGRAPH 3.2)”.
PAGE 3, ADDED PARAGRAPHS 3.8.1, 3.8.2, AND 3.8.3.
PAGE 4, PARAGRAPH 3.12: WAFER LOT ACCEPTANCE EXPLANATION WAS REWRITTEN.
PAGE 4, PARAGRAPH 4.4.2, GROUP B INSPECTION WAS REDEFINED. PARAGRAPH 4.4.3,
GROUP D INSPECTION WAS REDEFINED.
PAGE 5, PARAGRAPH 4.5.1, SOURCE INSPECTION WAS REDEFINED.
PAGES 6, 7, 8, FIGURES 1, 2, 3 CASE OUTLINES: ADDED θja AND θjc .
UPDATED ENTIRE SPEC TO REVISION A.
10/21/97
PAGE 2, PARAGRAPH 3.2.3, DEVICE OPTION 3, CORRECTED THE PACKAGE TYPE FROM
“FLATPACK” TO “FLATPACK, GLASS SEAL”.
PAGE 3, PARAGRAPH 3.8.3, DEVICE OPTION 3, CORRECTED THE PACKAGE TYPE FROM
“BOTTOM BRAZED FLATPACK” TO FLATPACK, GLASS SEAL”
PAGE 8, CORRECTED PACKAGE TYPE FROM “CERPACK” TO “FLATPACK, GLASS SEAL / 10
LEADS”, FIGURE 3, CASE OUTLINE.
11/27/97
PAGE 4, AMENDED PARAGRAPH 4.1 AND 4.1.1 TAKING EXCEPTION TO ANALYSIS OF
CATASTROPHIC FAILURES.
ADDED A SECOND PAGE FOR REVISION RECORD. UPDATE ENTIRE SPEC TO NEXT
REVISION DUE TO THE ADDITIONAL PAGE.
03/13/98
•
•
•
B
•
•
•
C
•
•
D
•
PAGE 20, CORRECTED TYPO ON THE MINIMUM ENDPOINT LIMITS FOR +IB, AND -IB,
PARAMETERS FROM +1.0 TO –50.
10/01/98
E
•
PAGE 7,8,9, FIGURE 1,2,3 CHANGED θJA AND θJC.
09/28/99
REVISION RECORD AND DESCRIPTION CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE.
CAUTION: ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE SENSITIVE PART
REVISION
INDEX
REVISION
INDEX
PAGE NO.
REVISION
PAGE NO.
REVISION
APPLICATION
1
M
18
M
ORIG
DSGN
ENGR
MFG
CM
QA
PROG
FUNCT
2
M
19
M
3
M
20
M
4
M
5
M
6
M
7
M
8
M
9
M
10
M
11
M
12
M
13
M
14
M
15
M
16
M
17
M
LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
MILPITAS, CALIFORNIA
TITLE:
MICROCIRCUIT, LINEAR,
RH1011, VOLTAGE COMPARATOR
SIZE
SIGNOFFS
DATE
CAGE CODE
64155
CONTRACT:
DRAWING NUMBER
REV
05-08-5012
M
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
LINEAR TECHNOLOGY
PAGE 1 OF 20
SPEC NO. 05-08-5012 REV. M
REV
F
G
H
RH1011, VOLTAGE COMPARATOR
REVISION RECORD
DESCRIPTION
• PAGE 3, PARAGRAPHS 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3 HAD FIGURES 1, 2, AND 3 REMOVED.
• PAGE 4, PARAGRAPH 3.7, CHANGED VERBIAGE FROM “SPECIFIED IN TABLE III” TO “AND AS
SPECIFIED IN TABLE III HEREIN”, LINE 2.
PARAGRAPH 3.9, ADDED “HEREIN” AFTER “TABLE II”, LINE 2.
• PAGE 5, PARAGRAPH 4.3, ADDED “HEREIN” AFTER “TABLE III”, LINE 2.
PARAGRAPH 4.4.1, ADDED “HEREIN” AFTER “TABLE III”, LINE 2.
PARAGRAPH 4.4.2.2, CHANGED VERBIAGE IN LINE 1 FROM “ALL FOOTNOTES OF TABLE IIA
OF MIL-STD-883” TO “ALL FOOTNOTES PERTAINING TO TABLE IIA IN MIL-STD-883”.
• PAGE 6, PARAGRAPH 4.4.3.2, CHANGED VERBIAGE IN LINE 1 FROM “ALL FOOTNOTES OF
TABLE IV OF MIL-STD-883” TO “ALL FOOTNOTES PERTAINING TO TABLE IV IN MIL-STD-883’.
• PAGE 20, CORRECTED TABLE NUMBER FROM “TABLE II” TO “TABLE III ELECTRICAL TEST
REQUIRMENTS”.
• PAGE 9, CHANGED THETA JA TO θJA=170°C/W AND THETA JC TO θJC=40°C/W FROM
θJA=225°C/W AND θJC=18°C/W PER PACKAGE ENGINEER.
• PAGE 3:
PARAGRAPH 3.2.1 ADDED “OPTION 1”, PARAGRAPH 3.2.2, ADDED “OPTION 2”, PARAGRAPH 3.2.3,
ADDED “OPTION 3”.
DATE
11/19/99
9/5/00
9/5/04
• PAGE 4:
PARAGRAPH 3.6, TABLE IA CHANGED TO TABLE II.
PARAGRAPH 3.7, TABLE III CHANGED TO TABLE IV. TABLE IV REMOVED SUBGROUP 5,6.
PARAGRAPH 3.8, CHANGE OPTIONS 1,2,3 STATIC BURN-IN FIGURE 7,9,11.
PARAGRAPH 3.9, TABLE II CHANGED TO TABLE III.
PARAGRAPH 3.10.3, ADDED “DEVICE OPTIONS 1, 2, AND 3” TO LINE 1.
PARAGRAPH 3.11.1 WAS CHANGED FROM “…dosage rate of approximately 20 Rads per
second” TO “…dosage rate of less than or equal to 10 Rads per second”.
• PAGE 5:
PARAGRAPHS 4.1 THROUGH 4.4.2.1 CHANGES WERE DONE TO CLARIFY GROUP SAMPLING.
• PAGE 6:
PARAGRAPH 4.4.3 CHANGE WAS DONE TO CLARIFY GROUP SAMPLING.
PARAGRAPHS 4.6.2 THROUGH 4.6.4 WERE RE-WRITTEN. THESE DATA PROVIDED, AND DATA
AVAILABLE.
PARAGRAPH 4.6.10 NOTE, ADDED FURTHER EXPLANATION OF MINIMUM DELIVERED DATA.
J
K
L
M
•
PAGES 7 THROUGH 17, ALL FIGURE TITLES CHANGED TO HAVE DEVICE OPTIONS AND
PACKAGE TYPES AT TOP OF PAGE, AND HAVE ALL FIGURES AT BOTTOM OF PAGE.
•
PAGE 8:
CASE OUTLINE REVISED. LEAD DIMENSION CHANGED FROM .068 TO 0.065.
•
PAGE 9:
CASE OUTLINE UPDATED TO MEET MIL-STD-1835 GUIDELINES.
•
PAGE 10, MOVED FIGURES TO BETTER FIT THE PAGE.
•
PAGE 18, CHANGED TABLE 1,2 ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS (PRE & POST IRRADIATION )
PER NEW DATA SHEET.
•
PAGE 20, CHANGED ENDPOINT LIMIT FOR VOS FROM + 2.0 TO + 1.5.
•
•
PAGE 5, CHANGED INITIAL RATE OF RADS TO 240 RADS/SEC.
PAGE 5, CHANGED IN BOTH PARAGRAPHS 4.2, 4.3 IN CONJUNCTION TO 3.3 CHANGED TO 3.4
AND PARAGRAPH 4.3 CHANGED 3.1.1 TO 3.1 AND 3.2.1 TO 3.1.1
PAGE 4, PARAGRAPH 3.10.3 ADDED OPTION 3 IS ALLOY 42 FOR FLATPACK
PAGE 4, PARAGRAPH 3.10.3 CHANGED OPTION 2 TO ALLOY 42 PACKAGE REQUIREMENT.
PAGE 5, PARAGRAPH 3.11.1 CHANGED VERBIAGE.
PAGE 5, PARAGRAPH 4.4.2 CHANGED VERBIAGE.
PAGE 9 FIGURE 3 NOTE 2 ADDED TO LEAD THICKNESS.
•
•
•
•
•
LINEAR TECHNOLOGY
3/16/05
03/05/08
04/29/08
06/25/08
PAGE 2 OF 20
SPEC NO. 05-08-5012 REV. M
1.0
SCOPE:
1.1
2.0
RH1011, VOLTAGE COMPARATOR
This specification defines the performance and test requirements for a microcircuit processed to a space
level manufacturing flow.
APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS:
2.1
Government Specifications and Standards: the following documents listed in the Department of Defense
Index of Specifications and Standards, of the issue in effect on the date of solicitation, form a part of this
specification to the extent specified herein.
SPECIFICATIONS:
2.2
3.0
MIL-PRF-38535
Integrated Circuits (Microcircuits) Manufacturing, General Specification for
MIL-STD-883
Test Method and Procedures for Microcircuits
MIL-STD-1835
Microcircuits Case Outlines
Order of Precedence: In the event of a conflict between the documents referenced herein and the contents
of this specification, the order of precedence shall be this specification, MIL-PRF-38535 and other
referenced specifications.
REQUIREMENTS:
3.1
General Description: This specification details the requirements for the RH1011 LOW VOLTAGE
COMPARATOR, processed to space level manufacturing flow.
3.2
Part Number:
3.3
3.2.1
Option 1 – RH1011H (TO5 Metal Can, 8 Leads)
3.2.2
Option 2 – RH1011J8 (Ceramic Dip, 8 Leads)
3.2.3
Option 3 – RH1011W (Glass Sealed Flatpack, 10 Leads)
Part Marking Includes:
a.
LTC Logo
b.
LTC Part Number (See Paragraph 3.2)
c.
Date Code
d.
Serial Number
e.
ESD Identifier per MIL-PRF-38535, Appendix A
LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
PAGE 3 OF 20
SPEC NO. 05-08-5012 REV. M
3.4
RH1011, VOLTAGE COMPARATOR
The Absolute Maximum Ratings:
Supply Voltage (Pin 8 to Pin 4)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36V
. . . . . . . . . . 35V
Output to Negative Supply (Pin 7 to Pin 4)
. . . . . . . . . . 30V
Ground to Negative Supply (Pin 1 to Pin 4)
Differential Input Voltage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +35V
. . . . . . . . . . . . 5V
Voltage at Strobe Pin (Pin 6 to Pin 8)
. . . . . . . . . . . . EQUAL TO SUPPLIES
Input Voltage 1/
. . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 sec
Output Short Circuit Duration
. . . . . . . . . . -55°C to +125°C
Operating Temperature Range
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +150°C
Tjmax
. . . . . . . . . . -65°C to +150°C
Storage Temperature Range
. . . . . . . . . . . +300°C
Lead Temperature (Soldering, 10 sec)
1/ Inputs may be clamped to supplies with diodes so that maximum input voltage actually exceeds supply
voltage by one diode drop. See Input Protection discussion in the LT1011 data sheet.
3.5
Electrostatic discharge sensitivity, ESDS, shall be Class 1.
3.6
Electrical Performance Characteristics: The electrical performance characteristics shall be as specified in
Table I and Table II.
3.7
Electrical Test Requirements: Screening requirements shall be in accordance with 4.1 herein,
MIL-STD-883, Method 5004, and as specified in Table IV herein.
3.8
Burn-In Requirement:
3.8.1
Option 1 (TO5): Static Burn-In, Figure 7; Dynamic Burn-In, Figure 8
3.8.2
Option 2 (Ceramic Dip): Static Burn-In, Figure 9; Dynamic Burn-In, Figure 10
3.8.3
Option 3 (Glass Sealed Flatpack) : Static Burn-In, Figure 11; Dynamic Burn-In, Figure 12
3.9
Delta Limit Requirement: Delta limit parameters are specified in Table III herein, are calculated after
each burn-in, and the delta rejects are included in the PDA calculation.
3.10
Design, Construction, and Physical Dimensions: Detail design, construction, physical dimensions, and
electrical requirements shall be specified herein.
3.11
3.10.1
Mechanical / Packaging Requirements: Case outlines and dimensions are in accordance with
Figure 1, Figure 2, and Figure 3.
3.10.2
Terminal Connections: The terminal connections shall be as specified in Figure 4, Figure 5,
and Figure 6.
3.10.3
Lead Material and Finish: The lead material and finish for Device Options 1, shall be Kovar
and options 2, 3 is alloy 42. The lead finishes shall be hot solder dip (Finish letter A) in
accordance with MIL-PRF-38535.
Radiation Hardness Assurance (RHA):
3.11.1
The manufacturer shall perform a lot sample test as an internal process monitor for total dose
radiation tolerance. The sample test is performed with MIL-STD-883 TM1019 Condition A as
a guideline.
LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
PAGE 4 OF 20
SPEC NO. 05-08-5012 REV. M
4.0
RH1011, VOLTAGE COMPARATOR
3.11.2
For guaranteed radiation performance to MIL-STD-883, Method 1019, total dose irradiation,
the manufacturer will provide certified RAD testing and report through an independent test
laboratory when required as a customer purchase order line item.
3.11.3
Total dose bias circuit is specified in Figure 13.
3.12
Wafer Lot Acceptance: Wafer lot acceptance shall be in accordance with MIL-PRF-38535, Appendix A,
except for the following: Topside glassivation thickness shall be a minimum of 4KÅ.
3.13
Wafer Lot Acceptance Report: SEM is performed per MIL-STD-883, Method 2018 and copies of SEM
photographs shall be supplied with the Wafer Lot Acceptance Report as part of a Space Data Pack when
specified as a customer purchase order line item.
VERIFICATION (QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS)
4.1
Quality Assurance Provisions: Quality Assurance provisions shall be in accordance with MIL-PRF-38535.
Linear Technology is a QML certified company and all Rad Hard candidates are assembled on qualified
Class S manufacturing lines.
4.2
Sampling and Inspection: Sampling and Inspection shall be in accordance with MIL-STD-883, Method
5005 with QML allowed and TRB approved deviations in conjunction with paragraphs 3.1.1, 3.2.1, and
3.4 of the test method.
4.3
Screening: Screening requirements shall be in accordance with MIL-STD-883, Method 5004 with QML
allowed and TRB approved deviations in conjunction with paragraphs 3.1, 3.1.1, and 3.4 of the test
method. Electrical testing shall be as specified in Table IV herein.
4.3.1
4.4
Analysis of catastrophic (open/short) failures from burn-in will be conducted only when a lot
fails the burn-in or re-burn-in PDA requirements.
Quality Conformance Inspection: Quality conformance inspection shall be in accordance with 4.2 and 4.3
herein and as follows:
4.4.1
Group A Inspection: Group A inspection shall be performed in accordance with 4.1 herein, per
MIL-STD-883, Method 5005, and specified in Table IV herein.
4.4.2
Group B Inspection: When purchased, a full Group B is performed on an inspection lot. As a
minimum, Subgroups 1-4 plus 6 are performed on every assembly lot, and Subgroup B2
(Resistance to Solvents / Mark Permanency) and Subgroup B3 (Solderability) are performed
prior to the first shipment from any inspection lot and Attributes provided when a Full Space
Data Pack is ordered. Subgroup B5 (Operating Life) is performed on each wafer lot. This
subgroup may or may not be from devices built in the same package style as the current
inspection lot. Attributes and variables data for this subgroup will be provided upon request at
no charge.
4.4.2.1 Group B, Subgroup 2c = 10%
Group B, Subgroup 3 = 10%
Group B, Subgroup 4 = 5%
LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Group B, Subgroup 5 = *5%
(*per wafer or inspection lot
whichever is the larger quantity)
Group B, Subgroup 6 = 15%
PAGE 5 OF 20
SPEC NO. 05-08-5012 REV. M
4.4.3
4.5
4.6
RH1011, VOLTAGE COMPARATOR
4.4.2.2 All footnotes pertaining to Table IIa in MIL-STD-883, Method 5005 apply. The
quantity (accept number) of all other subgroups are per MIL-STD-883, Method 5005,
Table IIa.
Group D Inspection: When purchased, a full Group D is performed on an inspection lot. As a
minimum, periodic full Group D sampling is performed on each package family for each
assembly location every 26 weeks. A generic Group D Summary is provided when a full Space
Data Pack is ordered.
4.4.3.1
Group D, Subgroups 3, 4 and 5 = 15% each (Sample Size Series).
4.4.3.2
All footnotes pertaining to Table IV in MIL-STD-883, Method 5005 apply. The
quantity (accept number) or sample number and accept number of all other subgroups
are per MIL-STD-883, Method 5005, Table IV.
Source Inspection:
4.5.1
The manufacturer will coordinate Source Inspection at wafer lot acceptance and pre-seal internal
visual.
4.5.2
The procuring activity has the right to perform source inspection at the supplier’s facility prior to
shipment for each lot of deliverables when specified as a customer purchase order line item.
This may include wafer lot acceptance and final data review.
Deliverable Data: Deliverable data that will ship with devices when a Space Data Pack is ordered:
4.6.1
Lot Serial Number Sheets identifying all devices accepted through final inspection by serial
number.
4.6.2
100% attributes (completed lot specific traveler; includes Group A Summary)
4.6.3
Burn-In Variables Data and Deltas (if applicable)
4.6.4
Group B2, B3, and B5 Attributes (Variables data, if performed on lot shipping)
4.6.5
Generic Group D data (4.4.3 herein)
4.6.6
SEM photographs (3.13 herein)
4.6.7
Wafer Lot Acceptance Report (3.13 herein)
4.6.8
X-Ray Negatives and Radiographic Report
4.6.9
A copy of outside test laboratory radiation report if ordered
4.6.10
Certificate of Conformance certifying that the devices meet all the requirements of this
specification and have successfully completed the mandatory tests and inspections herein.
Note: Items 4.6.1 and 4.6.10 will be delivered as a minimum, with each shipment. This is noted
on the Purchase Order Review Form as “No Charge Data”.
5.0
Packaging Requirements: Packaging shall be in accordance with Appendix A of MIL-PRF-38535. All devices
shall be packaged in conductive material or packaged in anti-static material with an external conductive field
shielding barrier.
LINEAR TECHNOLOGY
PAGE 6 OF 20
SPEC NO. 05-08-5012 REV. M
RH1011, VOLTAGE COMPARATOR
DEVICE OPTION # 1
(H) TO5 / 8 LEADS CASE OUTLINE
θja = +150°C/W
θjc = +40°C/W
FIGURE 1
LINEAR TECHNOLOGY
PAGE 7 OF 20
SPEC NO. 05-08-5012 REV. M
RH1011, VOLTAGE COMPARATOR
DEVICE OPTION # 2
(J8) CERAMIC DIP / 8 LEADS CASE OUTLINE
NOTE:
1. LEAD DIMENSIONS APPLY TO SOLDER DIP OR TIN PLATE LEADS.
2. 8 LEAD D MAX = .405 (10.287)
θja = +110°C/W
θjc = +30°C/W
FIGURE 2
LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
PAGE 8 OF 20
SPEC NO. 05-08-5012 REV. M
RH1011, VOLTAGE COMPARATOR
DEVICE OPTION # 3
(W10) GLASS SEALED FLATPACK / 10LEADS CASE OUTLINE
NOTE: 1. THIS DIMENSION ALLOWS FOR OFFCENTER LID, MENISCUS AND GLASS OVER RUN.
NOTE: 2. INCREASE DIMENSION BY 0.003 INCH
WHEN LEAD FINISH IS APPLIED (SOLDER DIPPED).
θja = +170°C/W
θjc = +40°C/W
FIGURE 3
LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
PAGE 9 OF 20
SPEC NO. 05-08-5012 REV. M
RH1011, VOLTAGE COMPARATOR
TERMINAL CONNECTIONS
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 6
LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
PAGE 10 OF 20
SPEC NO. 05-08-5012 REV. M
RH1011, VOLTAGE COMPARATOR
STATIC BURN-IN CIRCUIT
OPTION 1, TO5 METAL CAN / 8 LEADS
FIGURE 7
LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
PAGE 11 OF 20
SPEC NO. 05-08-5012 REV. M
RH1011, VOLTAGE COMPARATOR
DYNAMIC BURN-IN CIRCUIT
OPTION 1, TO5 METAL CAN / 8 LEADS
FIGURE 8
LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
PAGE 12 OF 20
SPEC NO. 05-08-5012 REV. M
RH1011, VOLTAGE COMPARATOR
STATIC BURN-IN CIRCUIT
OPTION #2, CERDIP / 8 LEADS
FIGURE 9
LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
PAGE 13 OF 20
SPEC NO. 05-08-5012 REV. M
RH1011, VOLTAGE COMPARATOR
DYNAMIC BURN-IN CIRCUIT
OPTION 2, CERDIP / 8 LEADS
FIGURE 10
LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
PAGE 14 OF 20
SPEC NO. 05-08-5012 REV. M
RH1011, VOLTAGE COMPARATOR
STATIC BURN-IN CIRCUIT
OPTION 3, GLASS SEALED FLATPACK / 10 LEAD
FIGURE 11
LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
PAGE 15 OF 20
SPEC NO. 05-08-5012 REV. M
RH1011, VOLTAGE COMPARATOR
DYNAMIC BURN-IN CIRCUIT
OPTION 3, GLASS SEALED FLATPACK / 10 LEAD
FIGURE 12
LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
PAGE 16 OF 20
SPEC NO. 05-08-5012 REV. M
RH1011, VOLTAGE COMPARATOR
TOTAL DOSE BIAS CIRCUIT
FIGURE 13
LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
PAGE 17 OF 20
SPEC NO. 05-08-5012 REV. M
RH1011, VOLTAGE COMPARATOR
TABLE I: ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS (PRE-IRRADIATION) NOTE 10
TABLE II: ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS (POST-IRRADIATION) NOTE 10
SPECIAL NOTES:
TABLE II IS CONTINUED ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE.
DATA SHEET NOTES FOR TABLE I AND TABLE II FOLLOW TABLE II.
LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
PAGE 18 OF 20
SPEC NO. 05-08-5012 REV. M
RH1011, VOLTAGE COMPARATOR
TABLE II: ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS (POST-IRRADIATION) NOTE 10 (CONTINUED)
LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
PAGE 19 OF 20
SPEC NO. 05-08-5012 REV. M
RH1011, VOLTAGE COMPARATOR
TABLE III: POST BURN-IN ENDPOINTS AND DELTA LIMIT REQUIREMENTS
TA = 25°C
PARAMETER
VOS
+IB
-IB
ENDPOINT LIMIT
MIN
MAX
-1.5
1.5
-50
50
-50
50
DELTA
MIN
-0.5
-5.0
-5.0
MAX
0.5
5.0
5.0
UNITS
mV
nA
nA
TABLE IV: ELECTRICAL TEST REQUIREMENTS
MIL-STD-883 TEST REQUIREMENTS
FINAL ELECTRICAL TEST REQUIREMENTS (METHOD
5004)
GROUP A TEST REQUIREMENTS (METHOD 5005)
GROUP B AND D FOR CLASS S ENDPOINT ELECTRICAL
PARAMETERS (METHOD 5005)
SUBGROUP
1*, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
1, 2, 3
*PDA APPLIES TO SUBGROUP 1.
PDA TEST NOTE: The PDA is specified as 5% based on failures from Group A, Subgroup 1, tests after cooldown as the
final electrical test in accordance with method 5004 of MIL-STD-883. The verified failures of Group A, Subgroup 1 and
delta rejects after burn-in divided by the total number of devices submitted for burn-in in that lot shall be used to determine
the percent for the lot.
LINEAR TECHNOLOGY
PAGE 20 OF 20