INFINEON CCM

Design Note DN 2013-01
V1.0 January 2013
CCM PFC Boost Converter Design
Sam Abdel-Rahman
Infineon Technologies North America (IFNA) Corp.
Design Note DN 2013-01
CCM PFC Boost Converter Design
V1.0 January 2013
Edition 2013-01-01
Published by
Infineon Technologies North America
27703 Emperor Blvd, suite 310, Durham, NC 27703
© Infineon Technologies North America Corp. 2013
All Rights Reserved.
Attention please!
THE INFORMATION GIVEN IN THIS APPLICATION NOTE IS GIVEN AS A HINT FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES COMPONENT ONLY AND SHALL NOT BE REGARDED
AS ANY DESCRIPTION OR WARRANTY OF A CERTAIN FUNCTIONALITY, CONDITION OR QUALITY
OF THE INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES COMPONENT. THE RECIPIENT OF THIS APPLICATION NOTE
MUST VERIFY ANY FUNCTION DESCRIBED HEREIN IN THE REAL APPLICATION. INFINEON
TECHNOLOGIES HEREBY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES AND LIABILITIES OF ANY KIND
(INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION WARRANTIES OF NON-INFRINGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY RIGHTS OF ANY THIRD PARTY) WITH RESPECT TO ANY AND ALL INFORMATION
GIVEN IN THIS APPLICATION NOTE.
Information
For further information on technology, delivery terms and conditions and prices please contact your
nearest Infineon Technologies Office (www.infineon.com).
Warnings
Due to technical requirements components may contain dangerous substances. For information on the
types in question please contact your nearest Infineon Technologies Office. Infineon Technologies
Components may only be used in life-support devices or systems with the express written approval of
Infineon Technologies, if a failure of such components can reasonably be expected to cause the failure of
that life-support device or system, or to affect the safety or effectiveness of that device or system. Life
support devices or systems are intended to be implanted in the human body, or to support and/or maintain
and sustain and/or protect human life. If they fail, it is reasonable to assume that the health of the user or
other persons may be endangered.
DN 2013-01
Subjects: CCM PFC Boost Converter Design
Author: Sam Abdel-Rahman (IFNA PMM SMD AMR PMD 2)
We Listen to Your Comments
Any information within this document that you feel is wrong, unclear or missing at all? Your feedback will
help us to continuously improve the quality of this document. Please send your proposal (including a
reference to this document) to: [[email protected]]
2
Design Note DN 2013-01
CCM PFC Boost Converter Design
V1.0 January 2013
Table of contents
1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4
2 Boost topology ............................................................................................................................................ 4
3 PFC Modes of Operation ............................................................................................................................. 5
4 CCM PFC Boost Design Equations ........................................................................................................... 7
5 References .................................................................................................................................................17
3
Design Note DN 2013-01
V1.0 January 2013
CCM PFC Boost Converter Design
1
Introduction
Power Factor Correction (PFC) shapes the input current of the power supply to be in synchronization with
the mains voltage, in order to maximize the real power drawn from the mains. In a perfect PFC circuit, the
input current follows the input voltage as would an equivalent resistor, with no added input current
harmonics. This document is intended to discuss the topology and operational mode for high power PFC
applications (>300W), and provide detailed design equations with examples.
2
Boost topology
Although active PFC can be achieved by any basic topology, the boost converter (Figure 2.1) is the most
popular topology used in PFC applications, for the following reasons: The line voltage varies from zero to
some peak value typically 375V, hence; a step up converter is needed to output a dc bus voltage of 380V or
more. For that reason the buck converter is eliminated, and the buck-boost converter has high switch voltage
stress (Vin+Vo). Moreover, the boost converter has the filter inductor on the input side, which provides a
smooth continuous input current waveform as opposed to the discontinuous input current of a buck or buckboost topology. This continuous input current is much easier to filer, which is a major advantage because
any additional filtering that is needed on the input side of the converter adds cost and reduces the power
factor due to capacitive loading of the line.
Boost Key Waveforms
T=1/f
DC Bus
AC
Vac
PFC
Converter
S
DC/DC
Converter
Load
DT
Vin
V_L
I_Lmax
Vin-Vo
I_Lmin
I_L
L
VacAC
D
S
DC Bus
Co
Ro
Figure 2.1
4
+
Vo
-
I_Lmax
I_S
I_Lmax
I_D
I_Lmin
Design Note DN 2013-01
V1.0 January 2013
CCM PFC Boost Converter Design
3
PFC Modes of Operation
The boost converter can operate in three modes: continuous conduction mode (CCM), discontinuous
conduction mode (DCM), and critical conduction mode (CrCM). Fig. 2 shows modeled waveforms to illustrate
the inductor and input currents in the three operating modes, for the same exact voltage and power
conditions.
15
15
10
15
10
Iin ( t)
I in( t)
Iin( t)
IL ( t)
I L ( t)
IL ( t)
5
5
5
0
0
0
-4
-4
-4
-4
Continuous Conduction Mode (CCM)
1
10
2
3
10
t
10
4
10
10
0
-4
1 10
-4
-4
2 10
3 10
-4
4 10
Critical Conduction Mode (CrCM)
t
0
0
-4
110
-4
210
-4
310
-4
410
Discontinuous Conduction
Mode (DCM)
t
Figure 3.1
Although DCM operation seems simpler than CrCM, since it may operate in constant frequency operation,
DCM has the disadvantage that it has the highest peak current compared to CCM and CrCM, but with no
performance advantage compared to CrCM, and one potential disadvantage. For that reason, CrCM is a
more common practice than DCM, therefore, this document will exclude the DCM mode.
CrCM may be considered a special case of CCM, where operation is controlled to stay at the boundary
between CCM and DCM. CrCM usually uses constant on-time control; as the line voltage is changing across
the 60Hz line cycle, the reset time for the boost inductor varies, and the operating frequency will change as
well in order while maintaining boundary mode operation. CrCM dedicated controllers sense the inductor
current zero crossing in order to trigger the start of the next switching cycle. When carefully designed, the
boost rectifier diode for the CrCM PFC is selected not to be ultra-fast, but of medium fast speed, so that the
inductor current not only completely resets to zero but may switch slightly negative. This energy stored in
the CrCM boost inductor will “Flyback” to ground, achieving ZVS turn-on for the boost MOSFET under most
conditions, particularly at input voltage above 200V, when this will not usually occur for a 400V nominal bulk
bus system.
The current ripple (or the peak current) in CrCM is twice the average value, which greatly increases the RMS
currents and turn off current. But since every switching cycle starts at zero current, and usually with ZVS
operation, turn on loss is usually eliminated. Also, since the boost rectifier diode turns off at zero current as
well, reverse recovery losses from Qrr and noise from switching at high Irrm in the boost diode are eliminated
too, another major advantage of CrCM mode. Still, on the balance, the high input ripple current and it’s
impact on the input EMI filter tends to eliminate CrCM mode for high power designs unless interleaved
stages are used to reduce the input HF current ripple. A high efficiency design can be realized that way, but
at substantially higher cost. That discussion is beyond the scope of this Design Note.
5
Design Note DN 2013-01
CCM PFC Boost Converter Design
V1.0 January 2013
The power stage equations and transfer functions for CrCM are the same as CCM. The main differences
relate to the current ripple profile and switching frequency, which affects RMS and switching power losses
and filter design.
Figure 3.2 IRMS Normalized by IA/IB ratio in relation to current
waveshape
CCM operation requires a larger filter inductor compared to CrCM. While the main design concerns for a
CrCM inductor are low HF core loss, low HF winding loss, and stable value over the operating range (the
inductor is essentially part of the timing circuit), the CCM mode inductor takes a different approach. For the
CCM mode PFC, the full load inductor current ripple is typically designed to be 20-40% of the average input
current. This has several advantages:
(1) Peak current is lower, and the RMS current factor with a trapezoidal waveform is reduced compared
to a triangular waveform, reducing conduction losses (Fig 3.2).
(2) Turn off losses are lower due to switch off at much lower maximum current.
(3) The HF ripple current to be smoothed by the EMI filter is much lower in amplitude.
On the other side, CCM encounters turn on losses with the MOSFET, which can be exacerbated by the
boost rectifier commutation recovery loss due to Q rr. For this reason, ultra-fast recovery diodes or silicon
carbide schottky diodes with no charge Qrr are needed for CCM mode.
In conclusion, we can say that for low power applications, the CrCM boost has an advantage in losses and
power density. This advantage may extend to medium power ranges, however at some medium power level
the low filtering and the high peak current starts to become severe disadvantages. At this point the CCM
boost starts being a better choice for high power applications.
According to the above, and since this document is intended to support high power PFC applications, the
following are detailed design discussions and design examples for a CCM PFC boost converter.
6
Design Note DN 2013-01
CCM PFC Boost Converter Design
4
V1.0 January 2013
CCM PFC Boost Design Equations
The following are design equations for the CCM operated boost, with a design example integrated to further
clarify the usage of all equations. The boost converter encounters the maximum current stress and power
losses at the minimum line voltage condition (
); hence, all design equations and power losses will be
calculated using the low line voltage condition.
Table 1 Specifications
Input voltage
85-265 VAC 60Hz
Output voltage
390V
Maximum power steady state
400W
Switching frequency
100kHz
Inductor current ripple
30%
Output voltage ripple (2x line frequency)
10 Vp-p
Hold-up time
16.6ms @ VO.min=350V
Figure 4.1 Block Schematic for boost power stage with input rectifier
Filter Inductor
The filter inductor value and its peak current are determined based on the specified maximum inductor
current ripple.
(1)
7
Design Note DN 2013-01
CCM PFC Boost Converter Design
V1.0 January 2013
(2)
→ Inductor saturation current, rectifier bridge, MOSFET and boost diode, must all be rated at > 7.5A . One
practical design would suggest 12A current ratings.
(3)
(4)
Off the shelf inductors are available and usable for a first pass design, typically with single layer windings
and a permeability droop of 30% or less [ ].
In some circumstances it may be desirable to further optimize the inductor configuration, in order to meet
requirements for high power factor over a wide line and input current range, and to optimize the inductor
size. Many of the popular PFC controllers use what is known as single cycle current loop control, which can
provide very good performance provided that the inductor remains in CCM mode operation. At low-line this is
no problem, but for operation in the high-line band (176VAC to 265VAC), the operating current will be much
lower. If an inductor is used with a nominal “stable” value of inductance, what works well at low-line results
in DCM mode operation for a significant part of the load range at high-line, and poorer power factor and
higher EMI than necessary.
Figure 4.2 Swinging Boost Inductor example optimized for CMM mode operation over wide range
8
Design Note DN 2013-01
CCM PFC Boost Converter Design
V1.0 January 2013
A swinging choke design can address this, by using a medium permeability core (75-125μ) of core types
such as Arnold/Micrometals Sendust and Magnetics Inc. Kool Mu, of the right energy capability and
designing for full load permeability droop by 75-80%, so that with lighter load the inductance swings up. The
full details of this technique are beyond the scope of this design note, but it can be facilitated with available
design tools from core manufacturers [2]. An example of this with operating current points referenced key
line voltage points in one design example is shown in Figure 4.2.
Rectifier Bridge
The bridge total power loss is calculated using the average input current flowing through two of the bridge
rectifying diodes.
(5)
Recommendation: GBJ1006-BP. Using a higher rated current bridge can reduce the forward VF, lowering
the total power dissipation at a small incremental cost. This is often a sound strategy, as with modern
components, the bridge rectifier usually has the highest total semiconductor loss for the PFC stage.
MOSFET
In order to select the the optimum MOSFET, one must understand the MOSFET requirements in a CCM
boost converter. High voltage MOSFETS have several families based on different technologies, which each
target a specific application, topology or operation. For a boost converter, the following are some major
MOSFET selection considerations:

Low FOMs - Ron*Qg and Ron*Eoss

Fast Turn-on/off switching, gate plateau near middle of gate drive range (which balances turn-on and
turn-off losses)

Low Output capacitance Coss for low switching energy, to increase light load efficiency- this relates to the
Ron*Eoss metric.

Switching and conduction losses must be balanced for minimum total loss - this is typically optimized at
the low line condition (if best thermals area desired), where worse case losses and temperature rise
occur. In other cases, it may be desired to optimize efficiency at a mid load condition, and ensure that
the thermal design is adequate for the worst case low-line dissipation. This varies with overall system
targets.

VDS rating to handle spikes/overshoots

Low thermal resistance RthJC. Package selection must consider the resulting total thermal resistance from
junction to ambient, and the worst case surge dissipation- this is typically under low-line cycle skip and
recovery into highline while ramping the bulk voltage back up.

Body diode speed and reverse recovery charge are not important, since body diode never conducts in a
boost converter.
9
Design Note DN 2013-01
CCM PFC Boost Converter Design
V1.0 January 2013
The recommended CoolMOS™ MOSFET series for
boost applications are the CP series and the C6/E6/P6
series. CP CoolMOS™ provides fastest switching
(Figure 4.3), hence, best performance, but requires
careful design in terms of gate driving circuit and PCB
layout [3]. The C6/E6 series provides a distinct cost
advantage, with easier design, but less performance
compared to CP series. The new (in 2013) P6 series
approaches CP performance closely at a better price
point, and is recommended for new designs that are cost
sensitive. [6]
According to the aforementioned MOSFET selection
criteria and to the specification listed in Table 1, the
IPW60R125CP is selected, and its parameters will be
used for the following calculations.
Figure 4.3
The MOSFET RMS current across the 60Hz line cycle can be calculated by the following equation;
consequently the MOSFET conduction loss is obtained.
(6)
(7)
For switching losses calculation, the average input current can be used to estimate losses over the line
cycle. The average input current is given as:
(8)
Turn-on time and loss:
(9)
(10)
10
Design Note DN 2013-01
CCM PFC Boost Converter Design
V1.0 January 2013
Turn-off time and loss:
(11)
(12)
This is the “classic” format for calculating turn-off time and loss; due to the high Qoss of SJ MOSFETs, the
Coss acts like a nonlinear capacitive snubber, and actual turn-off losses with fast switching can be up to 50%
lower than calculated. The current flow through the drain during turn-off under these conditions is nondissipative capacitive current, and with fast drive, the channel may be completely turned off by the onset of
drain voltage rise.
Output capacitance Coss switching loss:
(13)
Gate drive loss:
(14)
Boost Diode
Selection of the boost diode is a major design decision in CCM boost, since the diode is hard commutated at
a high current, and reverse recovery can cause significant power loss, noise and current spikes. Reverse
recovery can be a bottle neck for high switching frequency and high power density power supplies.
Additionally, at low line, the available diode conduction duty cycle is quite low, and the forward current quite
high in proportion to the average current. For that reason, the first criteria for selecting a diode in CCM boost
are fast recovery with low reverse recovery charge, followed by VF operating at high forward current.
11
Design Note DN 2013-01
CCM PFC Boost Converter Design
V1.0 January 2013
Since Silicon Carbide (SiC) Schottky diodes have
capacitive charge (Qc) rather than reverse recovery (Qrr),
their switching loss and recovery time are much lower
compared to Silicon Ultrafast diode, and will show an
enhanced performance. Moreover, SiC diodes allow
higher switching frequency designs, hence, higher power
density converters.
The capacitive charge for SiC diodes are not only low, but
also independent on di/dt, current level, and temperature;
where Si diodes have strong dependency on these
conditions, as shown in Figure 4.3.
Figure 4.3
The newer generations of SiC diodes are not just Schottky
devices, but are merged structure diodes known as MPS diodes - Merged PN/Schottky (Figure 4.4). They
combine the relatively low VF and capacitive charge characteristics of Schottky diodes with the high peak
current capability of PN diodes, while avoiding the high junction voltage penalty (typically 2.5-3V at room
temperature) of a pure PN wide bandgap diode. [4]
Figure 4.4 : Schottky and Merged PN/Schottky compared
The recommended diode for CCM boost applications is the 650V thinQ SiC Generation 5 diodes.
SiC G5 diodes include Infineon’s leading edge technologies, such as diffusion soldering process and wafer
thinning technology. The result is a new family of products showing improved efficiency over all load
conditions, coming from both the improved thermal characteristics and a improved figure of merit (Qc x VF)
[5].
12
Design Note DN 2013-01
CCM PFC Boost Converter Design
V1.0 January 2013
With the high surge current capability of the MPS diode, there is some latitude for selection of the boost
diode- a simple rule of thumb that works well for a wide input range PFC for good cost/performance tradeoffs
is 1A diode rating for 80W of output power. For high-line range only applications, or high-line applications
with de-rated output power at low-line conditions, this may be adjusted to as much as 150W per 1A of diode
rating. In that case, for example, a 600W application in the 176 VAC to 255 VAC range will only “need” 4A.
But, with the improved Qc x VF figure of merit, higher efficiency may be achieved by up to doubling the ID
rating of the diode, especially for low-line applications where the input current is quite high with a short duty
cycle. The higher rated diode will have a much lower VF at the actual operating current, reducing conduction
losses. The lower Qc means there is no sacrifice of mid range or low range efficiency from using the larger
SiC diode.
Note that even when using the MPS type SiC diode, it is still preferred to use a bulk pre-charge diode as
2
shown earlier in Figure 4.1. This is a low frequency standard diode with high I t rating to support precharging the bulk capacitor to the peak of the AC line voltage; this is a high initial surge current stress (which
should be limited by a series NTC) that is best avoided for the HF boost rectifier diode.
According to the aforementioned diode selection discussion and to the specification listed in Table 1, SiC
diode IDH12G65C5 is selected, and its parameters will be used for the following calculations.
The boost diode carries an average current equal to the output current.
(15)
(16)
Due to current waveforms and duty cycle, the RMS value can approach 15% higher under worst case low
line conditions, but this requires a much more complex calculation to assess; a simpler form will get you in
the ball park.
Diode conduction loss approximation:
(17)
Diode switching loss, which is carried by the boost MOSFET:
(18)
13
Design Note DN 2013-01
CCM PFC Boost Converter Design
V1.0 January 2013
Output Capacitor
The output capacitor is sized to meet the hold-up time and voltage ripple requirements, the capacitor is
selected to have the larger value of the two equations below.
(19)
(20)
→
The capacitor RMS current across the 60Hz line cycle can be calculated by the following equation,
consequently the capacitor ESR loss is obtained.
(21)
(22)
Recommendation: 2 parallel EET-UQ2S331KF
14
Design Note DN 2013-01
V1.0 January 2013
CCM PFC Boost Converter Design
Heatsink
The MOSFET and diode can have separate heatsinks or share the same one, however, the selection of the
heatsink is based on its required thermal resistivity.
In case of separate heatsinks for the diode and
MOSFET, thermal resistors are modeled as in Figure
4.5.
PFET
TJ.FET RthJC.FET TC.FET
Pdiode
TJ.diodeRthJC.diode TC.diode RthCS.deiode TS.diodeRthSA.diode
RthCS.FET TS.FET RthSA.FET
Figure 4.5
In case of a single heatsink for both the diode and the
MOSFET, thermal resistors are modeled as in Figure
4.6.
The maximum heatsink temperature
outcome of the two equations below
is the minimum
PFET
TJ.FET RthJC.FET TC.FET
RthCS.FET
TS
Pdiode
TJ.diode
RthJC.diode
TC.diode
RthCS.diode
RthSA
TA
PFET+Pdiode
Figure 4.6
Once
is specified, then the heatsink thermal
resistance can be calculated.
is the thermal resistance from junction to case, this is specified in the MOSFET and Diode datasheets.
is the thermal resistace from case to heatsink, typically low compared to the overall thermal resistance,
its value depends on the the interface material, for example, thermal grease and thermal pad.
is the thermal resistance from heatsink to ambient, this is specified in the heatsink datasheets, it
depends on the heatsink size and design, and is a function of the surroundings, for example, a heatsink
could have difference values for
for different airflow conditions.
is the heatsink temperature,
is the case temperature ,
is the ambient temperature.
is FET’s total power loss ,
is diode’s total power loss.
15
Design Note DN 2013-01
V1.0 January 2013
CCM PFC Boost Converter Design
Table 2 shows three design examples for the CCM PFC boost converter, for different power levels and
switching frequencies.
Table 2
Design Example #1
Design Example #2
Design Example #3
700W 80kHz
1000W 60kHz
PFC-02301-00
PFC-05301-00
PFC-05301-00
GBJ1006-BP
GBJ1506-BP
GBJ2006-F
GBJ1006-BP
GBJ1506-BP
GBJ2006-F
IPW60R125CP
IPW60R075CP
IPW60R045CP
IDH12G65C5
IDW20G65C5
IDW30G65C5
2 x EET-UQ2S331KF
3 x EET-UQ2S331KF
3 x EET-UQ2S331KF
+ 1 x EETUQ2S391LA
400W 100kHz
Filter Inductor
Recommendation
Rectifier Bridge
Recommendation
MOSFET
Boost Diode
Output Capacitor
Recommendation
16
Design Note DN 2013-01
CCM PFC Boost Converter Design
5
V1.0 January 2013
References
[1] Precision, Inc., Vertical Mount toroidal inductors.
http://www.precision-inc.com/power-factor-correction-inductor-vertical-mount-toroid-p-691-l-en.html
[2] Micrometals Arnold Powder Core Inductor Design Software.
http://www.micrometalsarnoldpowdercores.com/software.php
[3] F. Bjoerk, J. Hancock, G. Deboy, Infineon Technologies Application Note: “CoolMOS CP - How to
make most beneficial use of the latest generation of super junction technology devices”. February
2007.
http://www.infineon.com/dgdl/Aplication+Note+CoolMOS+CP+(+AN_CoolMOS_CP_01_Rev.+1.2).p
df?folderId=db3a304412b407950112b408e8c90004&fileId=db3a304412b407950112b40ac9a40688
[4] R. Rupp, J. Hancock, F. Bjoerk, M. Treu, “Silicon Carbide Merged PN/Schottky Diodes for PFC
Applications”, Infineon Technologies NA, V. 1.2, 2008; upon request.
[5] Product Brief, 650V SiC thinQ!™ Generation 5 diodes.
http://www.infineon.com/dgdl/Infineon+-+Product+Brief++650V+SiC+Generation+5+diodes.pdf?folderId=db3a304314dca38901152836c5a412ab&fileId=db3
a3043399628450139b06e16a721d0
TM
[6] CoolMOS Selection Guide.
http://www.infineon.com/dgdl/infineon_CoolMOS_SelectionGuide.pdf?folderId=db3a304314dca389011528372fbb12ac&fileId=db3a30432f91014f012f95fc7c243
99d
17
Design Note DN 2013-01
CCM PFC Boost Converter Design
Symbols used in formulas
Vac.min: Minimum input voltage
Vo: Output voltage
Vac.min: Minimum input voltage
Vo: Output voltage
Po: Output power
f: Switching frequency
T: Switching time period
fline: line frequency
L: Filter inductor
%Ripple: Inductor current ripple percentage to input current
DCR: Inductor DC resistance
IL.avg: Inductor average current across the line cycle
IL.pk: Inductor peak current
PL.cond: Inductor conduction loss
VF.bridge: Bridge diode forward voltage drop
Pbridge: Bridge power loss
o
Ron(100C): MOSFET on resistance at 100 C
Qgs: MOSFET gate-source charge
Qgd: MOSFET gate-drain charge
Qg: MOSFET total gate charge
Rg: MOSFET gate resistance
Vpl: MOSFET gate plateau voltage
Vth: MOSFET gate threshold voltage
ton: MOSFET switching on time
toff: MOSFET switching off time
Eoss: MOSFET output capacitance switching energy
IS.rms: MOSFET rms current across the line cycle
PS.cond: MOSFET conduction loss
PS.on: MOSFET switching on power loss
PS.off: MOSFET switching off power loss
PS.oss: MOSFET output capacitance switching loss
PS.gate: MOSFET gate drive loss
ID.avg: Boost diode average current
VF.diode: Boost diode forward voltage drop
Qrr: Boost diode reverse recovery charge
PDcond: Boost diode conduction loss
PD.sw: Boost diode switching loss
Co: Output capacitor
ESR: Output capacitor resistance
thold: Hold-up time
Vo.min: Hold up minimum output voltage
∆Vo: Output voltage ripple
ICo.rms: Output capacitor rms current
PCo: Output capacitor conduction loss
18
V1.0 January 2013