ATMEL MH1RT

MH1RT QualPack
Qualification Package
MH1RT Sea of Gates
Radiation Tolerant 0.35 µm CMOS
MH1RT Sea of Gates
0.35 µm CMOS for Space Environment
QualPack
Rev.2 – Jan. 2002
1
MH1RT QualPack
1. Table of Contents
1.
Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................................ 2
2.
General Information ........................................................................................................................................... 3
3.
Technology Information .................................................................................................................................... 4
4.
3.1
Wafer Process Technology ........................................................................................................................ 4
3.2
Product Design ........................................................................................................................................... 5
3.3
Cross Section............................................................................................................................................... 6
Qualification........................................................................................................................................................ 7
4.1
Qualification methodology ........................................................................................................................ 7
4.2
Qualification test methods ......................................................................................................................... 8
4.3
Wafer Process Qualification...................................................................................................................... 9
4.3.1
Wafer Level Reliability....................................................................................................................... 9
4.3.2
Hot carrier qualification ....................................................................................................................... 9
4.3.3
Electromigration................................................................................................................................. 10
4.3.4
Product Reliability Results................................................................................................................. 12
4.4
Product Qualification............................................................................................................................... 13
4.4.1
Device reliability................................................................................................................................ 13
4.4.2
Packaging Reliability ......................................................................................................................... 14
4.5
Qualification status: ................................................................................................................................. 14
4.6
Irradiation................................................................................................................................................. 15
4.6.1
Conditions and Chronology ............................................................................................................... 15
4.6.2
Results................................................................................................................................................ 16
4.6.3
Irradiation summary ........................................................................................................................... 16
4.6.4
Irradiation test records........................................................................................................................ 17
5.
Environmental Information.............................................................................................................................. 20
6.
Other Data ......................................................................................................................................................... 21
2
6.1
ISO9001 and QS900 Certificates ............................................................................................................ 21
6.2
Data Book Reference................................................................................................................................ 22
Rev. 2 – Jan 2002
MH1RT QualPack
2. General Information
Product Name:
Function:
MH1RT
ASIC Sea of Gates
1.6 million gates, 596 pins
200 KRAD Total Dose capability
Wafer Process:
CMOS 0.35µm Rad Tolerant, 4 metal levels
Available Package Types
PQFP, PowerQuad, L/TQFP,PLCC, PBGA, Super PBGA
CPGA,CQFP, MQFPF, CLGA
Other Forms: Die, Wafer
Locations:
Process Development
Product Development
Wafer Plant
QC Responsibility
Probe Test
Assembly
Final Test
Lot Release
Shipment Control
Quality Assurance
Reliability Testing
Failure Analysis
Atmel Rousset, France
Atmel Nantes, France
Atmel Nantes, France
Atmel Rousset, France
Atmel Nantes, France
Atmel Nantes, France
Atmel Grenoble, France (except plastic)
Atmel Nantes, France
Atmel Nantes, France
Atmel Nantes, France
Atmel Nantes, France
Atmel Nantes, France
Atmel Nantes, France
Quality Management
Atmel Nantes, France
Signed: Pascal LECUYER
Rev.2 – Jan. 2002
3
MH1RT QualPack
3. Technology Information
3.1 Wafer Process Technology
Process Type (Name):
CMOS 0.35µm Rad Tolerant
Base Material:
Silicon Epi Substrate
Wafer Thickness (without back grinding) 725µm
Wafer Diameter
200mm
Number Of Masks
15
Gate Oxide
Material
Thickness
Silicon Dioxide
70A (optical for 3.3V)
Polysilicon
Number of Layers
Thickness
1
3200A
Metal
Number of Layers
Material:
Layer 1/3 Thickness
Upper layer Thickness
up to 4
Ti
TiN
AlCu
400A + 800A + 5000A + 100A Ti + 1000A TiN
400A + 800A + 8000A + 250A TiN
Passivation
Material
Thickness
SiO2/Si3N4
11000A / 10000A
4
Rev. 2 – Jan 2002
MH1RT QualPack
3.2 Product Design
Pad size opening
Logic Effective Channel Length
80µm * 100µm
0.35µm
Gate Poly Width
Gate Poly Spacing
0.35µm
0.49µm
Metal 1
Metal 1
Metal 2
Metal 2
Metal 3
Metal 3
Metal 4
Metal 4
Width
Spacing
Width
Spacing
Width
Spacing
Width
Spacing
0.42µm
0.49µm
0.56µm
0.49µm
0.56µm
0.49µm
0.56µm
0.49µm
Contact Size
Contact Spacing
0.35µm
0.49µm
Via 1 Size
Via 2 Size
0.42µm
0.42µm
Test Vehicles:
Die Size:
Pad Size
Code:
Mask:
Number of metal levels:
5280*8130 (42.9mm²)
80µm * 100µm
EV29
A5500
3
Die Size:
Pad Size
Code:
Mask:
Number of metal levels:
13097*13097 (169.78mm²)
80µm * 100µm
DRAF (MH242S)
A5544
4
Die Size:
Pad Size
Code:
Mask:
Number of metal levels:
6601*6601 (30.9mm²)
90µm * 90µm
65809E
A5552
3
Rev.2 – Jan. 2002
5
MH1RT QualPack
3.3 Cross Section
6
Rev. 2 – Jan 2002
MH1RT QualPack
4. Qualification
4.1 Qualification methodology
All product qualifications are split into three distinct steps as shown below. Before a product is released
for use, successful qualification testing are required at wafer, device and package level.
Wafer Level Reliability consists in testing individually basic process modules regarding their well known
potential limitations (Electromigration, Hot Carriers Injection, Oxide Breakdown, NVM Data Retention).
Each test is performed using wafer process specific structures.
Device reliability is covering either dice design and processing aspects. The tests are performed on
device under qualification, but generic data may also be considered for reliability calculation.
For each package type proposed in the Datasheet, it is verified that qualification data are available. If not
qualification tests are carried out for the new package types. In addition, one package type is selected to
verify packaging reliability of the device under qualification.
Product
Qualification
Wafer Level
Device
Packaging
(Design / Process)
Reliability
Reliability
Reliability
Rev.2 – Jan. 2002
7
MH1RT QualPack
4.2 Qualification test methods
General Requirements for Hermetic CMOS ICs
8
Standard
Test Description
Acceptance
MIL-STD 883
QCI Group C
Electrical Life Test (Early Failure Rate)
2000 hours 140°C
0/45 352h class B
0/45 700h class S
MIL-STD 883
Method 2016
QCI Group D1
Physical Dimensions
0/15
MIL-STD 883
Method 2004
condition B2
QCI GroupD2
Lead Integrity
0/3
MIL-STD 883
Method 1011
Method 1010
cond. C
Method 1004
QCI Group D3
Thermal shocks - 15 cycles
Temperature cycling - 100 cycles
Moisture Resistance - 240 hours
0/15
MIL-STD 883
Method 2002
Method 2007
Method 2001
QCI Group D4
Mechanical shocks
Vibration at variable frequency
Constant acceleration
0/15
MIL-STD 883
Method 1009
QCI Group D5
Salt atmosphere
0/15
MIL-STD 883
Method 1018
QCI Group D6
Internal vapor content
0/3
MIL-STD 883
Method 2025
QCI Group D7
Lead finish adhesion
0/15
MIL-STD 883
Method 2024
QCI Group D8
Lid torque
0/5
Rev. 2 – Jan 2002
MH1RT QualPack
4.3 Wafer Process Qualification
4.3.1 Wafer Level Reliability
This chapter contains all the information relative to the reliability of the 0.35um AT56K technology, from
which the MH1RT library has been derived. Results presented in the following sections concern the
reliability of the basic process steps which build up the technology.
4.3.2 Hot carrier qualification
Gate Oxides of 70 ang and 110 ang were subjected to stress to determine lifetimes due to Hot Carrier
Injection.
The 70 ang oxide was subjected to a Vd = 3.6v for 10% IDSAT shift for a 10/.35um NMOS transistor.
The DC results were .27 years which is equivalent to > 10 years for AC. (Source COS).
The 110 ang oxide was subjected to Vgs=3v and Vds=6v with a 0.6um gate length. Again the failure
criterion was 10% IDSAT shift. The DC results were 1.1 years, which is equivalent to much greater than
10 years for AC (Source ES2).
Note: Spec = 0.2 years DC.
Rev.2 – Jan. 2002
9
MH1RT QualPack
4.3.3 Electromigration
Electromigration testing was performed on six structures, which included Contact, Metal 1, Via 1, Metal
2, Via 2, and Metal 3. The conditions of the tests were 2E06 current density at an ambient temperature
of 200C. The testing was terminated at 1017 hours. With the exception of Metal 2, there were no failures.
In order to estimate a minimum life expectancy for the zero failure tests, time to first failure is calculated
as if occurring at 1017 hours of stress time. The following table summarizes the results of this testing:
Considered
TF
Contact
Metal 1
Via 1
Metal 2
Via 2
Metal 3
Tf 3.804% =
1017 hrs
Tf 3.608% =
1017 hrs
Tf 3.608% =
1017 hrs
MTF =
513.734 hrs
Tf 3.431% =
1017 hrs
Tf 3.804% =
1017 hrs
Stress
Tempe
rature
195.49
Current
Density J
Ea / n
2E06
0.66 / 2
203.68
2E06
0.66 / 2
200.11
2E06
0.66 / 2
209.67
2E06
0.66 / 2
200.97
2E06
0.66 / 2
212.77
Tf
0.1%
(hrs)
272.7
2
279.3
6
279.3
6
32.20
Normalized Use Tf
0.1%
654 Years
670 Years
670 Years
77 Years
285.8
685 Years
5
2E06
0.66 / 2 272.7
654 Years
2
Source: ES2 - Serma Tech Report (2/19/99)
Note: Sample size for each structure = 20.
Additional Electromigration testing is ongoing. A sample of 15 devices with a straight line Metal 1
structure has been stressed for 300+ days at 200C and 3E06 Amps/cm2. To date 8 devices have failed.
The estimated normalized Tf, 0.1% failure point is 2000 years. In addition Metal 3 testing is ongoing.
There has been only 2 failures out of 15 devices after 60+ days of testing. The testing is being performed
at 3.5E06 Amps/cm2 at 250C.
Metal 1
Metal 3
Stress
Temperature
200
250
Ea / n
0.6 / 2
0.6 / 2
Current
Density J
3E06
3.5E06
Source: COS
Tf 0.1%
(hrs)
102
ongoing
Normalized Use Tf
0.1%
2000 Years
ongoing
Note: Sample size for each structure = 15.
Note: The above Normalized Use conditions are based on specified Operating Temperatures of 110C
and Operating Current Densities of 2E05.
10
Rev. 2 – Jan 2002
MH1RT QualPack
Time Dependent Dielectric Breakdown
Gate oxide testing was performed on both 70 and 110 ang. A total of 750 samples were tested using the
70 ang oxide and a total of 500 samples were tested using the 110 ang oxide.
Two tests were performed – the exponential current ramping test and the voltage ramping method. The
following are the results of this testing:
QBd Results (0.1 A/Cm2):
Substrate
Structure
Nwell
Structure
Sample Size
70 ang
Sample Size
110 ang
% Defects below
1000 C/m2 70 ang
% Defects below
1000 C/m2 110 ang
750
500
0.4%
0%
750
500
0.4%
0%
Source: ES2
Note: Spec = 1.5%.
Ramping Voltage Results (2 V/s):
Area Substrate
Structure
Area Well
Structure
Edge Substrate
Structure
Edge Well
Structure
Sample Size
70 ang
Sample Size
110 ang
Dola/Dolp 70 ang
Dola/Dolp 110 ang
750
500
0.09
0.43
750
500
0.13
0.43
750
500
0.01
0.01
750
500
0.01
0.01
Source: ES2
Note: Spec < 1.
Rev.2 – Jan. 2002
11
MH1RT QualPack
4.3.4 Product Reliability Results
This section summarizes the cumulated AT56KRT technology reliability data.
Dynamic Operating Life Test
A total of 100 samples were life tested at 140°C . To date there have been no failures from this testing.
See results below:
PART
NUMBER
EV29 MH1RT
65609E
DRAF
MH1242
LOT
NUMBER
E03624A
A00422B
A00650B
SAMPLE
SIZE
45
45
10
TOTAL CKT
HRS (K)
2000
2000
2000
AMBIENT
TEMP (°C)
140
140
140
Vcc (V)
FAILURES
3.7
3.7
3.7
0
0
0
60% Confidence Estimate @ 50C & 0.6eV = 2.8 FITs
95% Confidence Estimate @ 50C & 0.6eV = 9.1 FITs
Early Failure Rate 48 hours @ 140°C, 100 devices from 3 lots / 0 Failure
12
Rev. 2 – Jan 2002
MH1RT QualPack
4.4 Product Qualification
4.4.1 Device reliability
This section summarizes the cumulated qualification data of the MH1RT products.
Lots
E03624A
E03624A
E03624A
A00422B
A00650B
Device Type/
Technology
EV29
MH1RT test
vehicle
EV29
MH1RT test
vehicle
EV29
MH1RT test
vehicle
Package:
Side Braze 28
65609E
1MBIT SRAM
SB32
DRAF
MH1242
MQFPF 256
Test Description
Step
Result
ESD
1000V
0/3
2000V
0/3
3000V
0/3
4000V
0/3
Latch-up:
Supply overvoltage
1.5*Vcc
0/5
Power injection
50mW
0/5
Operating Life Test
12h
0/45
500h
0/45
1000h
0/45
2000h
0/45
0105h
0/45
0500h
0/45
1000h
0/45
2000h
0/45
12h
0/10
80h
0/10
500h
0/10
1000h
0/10
2000h
0/10
Operating Life Test
Operating Life Test
Comment
Rev.2 – Jan. 2002
13
MH1RT QualPack
4.4.2 Packaging Reliability
This section summarizes the packaging reliability data of the MH1RT products.
Lots
E03624A
A00422F
Device Type/
Technology
EV29
MH1RT test
vehicle
Package:
Side Braze 28
Test Description
Step
Result
D3 Thermal Shocks
Elect.
Visual
Herm.
0/15
0/15
0/15
D4 Mechanical Shocks
Elect.
Visual
Herm.
0/15
0/15
0/15
65609E
1 MBIT SRAM
MQFPF 32
D3 Thermal Shocks
Elect.
Visual
Herm.
0/15
0/15
0/15
D4 Mechanical Shocks
Elect.
Visual
Herm.
0/15
0/15
0/15
Comment
4.5 Qualification status:
No failure noticed during MH1RT product qualification tests.
MH1RT ASIC Sea of Gates library has been qualified on March 2000.
MH1242 matrix tests allowed to extent the qualification domain up to the largest Sea of Gates size
circuits.
14
Rev. 2 – Jan 2002
MH1RT QualPack
4.6 Irradiation
4.6.1 Conditions and Chronology
The irradiation, according to the requirements of the MIL STD 883E method 1019.5, and the Radiation
Test Plan RTP085 is done using gamma rays from Cobalt 60 source using the EV29 test vehicle. The
bias schematic is as defined in the radiation test plan. The temperature inside the irradiator chamber is
25°C.
In order to evaluate the influence of the internal bias of the device we decided to test 2 configurations.
Half of the parts was initialized by loading the registers with 0 , the other half was initialized by loading
the registers with 1.
The irradiation sequence was fully static following the bias conditions defined in the RTP85.
We affected the 18 parts following 5 distances in order to get 5 total dose set , which correspond to 5
dose rates during 20hours.
Total dose
100Krads
200Krads
300Krads
400Krads
500Krads
Init at 0
Sn1
Sn5
Sn8
Sn12
Sn15
Init at 0 Init at 0 Init at 1 Init at 1
Sn2
Sn3
Sn4
Sn6
Sn7
Sn9
Sn10
Sn11
Sn13
Sn14
Sn16
Sn17
Sn18
Comment
The dosimetry has been controlled with a PTW probe referenced by the Laboratoire National Henri
Becquerel with a 10% accuracy.
The chronology of events is listed in table 1. The parts (all leads in short circuit) are transferred to the
test area after the end of the irradiation without bias.
The annealing sequence has been conducted as follows :
-
Storage at ambient temperature under bias.
Electrical measurements at ambiant temperature until recovery of electrical parameters.
Overtest (half total dose additional irradiation):
Total dose
50Krads
100Krads
150Krads
200Krads
250Krads
-
Init at 0
Sn1
Sn5
Sn8
Sn12
Sn15
Init at 0 Init at 0 Init at 1 Init at 1
Sn2
Sn3
Sn4
Sn6
Sn7
Sn9
Sn10
Sn11
Sn13
Sn14
Sn16
Sn17
Sn18
Comment
Storage at 100°C under bias during 168 hours.
Electrical measurements at ambient temperature.
Rev.2 – Jan. 2002
15
MH1RT QualPack
4.6.2 Results
All the parts passed the functional test even after 500krads irradiation provided the power supply
can deliver the requested current (range 2A)
A . ICCSB (in mA on the graphs) : It is the most sensitive parameter . The measurement is done
following three conditions:
ICCSB00 the registers are loaded with 0
ICCSB10 the registers are loaded with a queue 01010…
ICCSB11 the registers are loaded with 1.
It has to be noticed that where the parts were irradiated with registers to 0 ICCSB00 is 0
All the other configuration exhibit a large increase of ICCSB higher than 1amp (The 3 first
measurements were clamped to 250mA);
The 3 weeks ambient annealing shows a slow but significant recovery of the parameter .
The 2 last additional weeks of annealing was in dynamic mode (clk active in low frequency) and thus the
recovery is fully achieved.
The additional half dose irradiation test confirms the previous behavior and the high temperature
annealing leads to an almost full recovery of the parameter.
B. Input leakages (in uA on the graphs),
Only IIL is affected on the parts at 400krads and 500krads . This is recovered after annealing.
C.Tpd (TP8 given as an example in ns), Input clamp voltages
No significant change can be observed even after 500krads irradiation.
D. Output voltages
These parameters drift slightly due to irradiation but remains inside the specifications limits.
The recovery is achieved after ambient bias annealing .
4.6.3 Irradiation summary
This test plan shows the high tolerance of the V29, MH1RT Test Vehicle to a total ionizing dose
irradiation with Cobalt 60 gamma ray up to 500krads following the MIL STD 883 method 1019.5.
The behavior noticed on the test vehicle during the qualification experiments can reasonably be
predicted on the whole MH1RT product family.
16
Rev. 2 – Jan 2002
MH1RT QualPack
4.6.4 Irradiation test records
#1
ICCSB00 (IRR0)
#3
ICCSB00 (IRR1)
#4
#5
#7
#6
0.012
0.01
0.008
0.006
0.004
0.002
0
#8
#9
#12
#13
#17
INIT
BIAS
25°C
BIAS
25°C
BIAS
25°C
BIAS
100°C
#9
#12
#13
BIAS
100°C
BIAS
25°C
BIAS
25°C
BIAS
100°C
#4
#7
600
400
#10
200
#14
#15
BIAS
25°C
BIAS
25°C
1000
800
#8
BIAS
25°C
Ref
1200
#6
BIAS
25°C
#18
#3
#5
INIT
#14
ICCSB10(IRR1)
#2
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
#11
INIT
Ref
#1
ICCSB10 (IRR0)
#10
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
#11
0
#16
INIT IRR BIAS BIAS BIAS BIAS BIAS +0.5 BIAS
25°C 25°C 25°C 25°C 25°C IRR 100°C
#17
#18
Ref
Ref
ICCSB11 (IRR0)
#1
#5
1200
#6
1000
#8
800
#9
600
#12
400
#13
200
#15
0
INIT
IRR BIAS BIAS BIAS BIAS BIAS +0.5 BIAS
25°C 25°C 25°C 25°C 25°C IRR 100°C
ICCSB11 (IRR1)
#2
#16
#17
#3
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
#4
#7
#10
#11
#14
#18
INIT IRR BIAS BIAS BIAS BIAS BIAS +0.5 BIAS
25°C 25°C 25°C 25°C 25°C IRR 100°C
Ref
Ref
Rev.2 – Jan. 2002
17
MH1RT QualPack
#1
TP8 (IRR0)
#2
#5
#6
#8
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
#9
#12
#13
#15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
#1
#2
#5
IIL (IRR0)
1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
-7
-8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
#6
#8
#9
#12
#13
#15
#16
#17
Ref
#2
#5
#6
0.49
0.48
0.47
0.46
0.45
0.44
0.43
0.42
0.41
#8
#9
#12
#13
#15
1
2
3
4
5
6
2.2
#3
#4
2.1
2
#7
#10
1.9
1.8
#11
#18
Ref
1.7
1.6
1
2
3
7
8
9
#16
#17
Ref
4
5
6
7
8
IIL(IRR1)
0.015
#3
#4
0.01
0.005
0
1
-0.005
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
-0.01
#7
#10
#14
#18
Ref
-0.015
#1
VICH (IRR0)
18
#16
#17
Ref
TP8 (IRR1)
VICH(IRR1)
0.49
0.48
0.47
0.46
0.45
0.44
0.43
0.42
0.41
#3
#4
#7
#10
#11
#14
#18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Ref
Rev. 2 – Jan 2002
MH1RT QualPack
VICL (IRR1)
VICL (IRR0)
#1
#2
-0.39
#5
-0.4
#6
-0.41
-0.42
#8
#9
-0.42
-0.43
#12
-0.43
-0.44
#13
-0.44
#14
-0.45
#15
-0.45
-0.46
#16
#17
-0.46
#18
Ref
-0.39
1
-0.4
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
-0.41
-0.47
Ref
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
#3
#4
#7
#10
#11
-0.47
VOH (IRR1)
VOH (IRR0)
#1
3
#2
#5
2.5
#6
#8
2
1.5
#9
#12
1
0.5
#13
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
#17
Ref
#5
#6
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
#8
#9
#12
#13
#15
BIAS
25°C
BIAS
25°C
BIAS
25°C
#3
#4
2.6
2.55
#7
#10
2.5
#11
#18
2.45
2.4
Ref
1
2
3
4
#1
#2
VOL (IRR0)
INIT
2.65
BIAS
100°C
#16
#17
5
6
7
8
9
VOL(IRR1)
0.25
#3
0.2
#4
0.15
#7
0.1
#10
#11
0.05
#18
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Ref
Rev.2 – Jan. 2002
19
MH1RT QualPack
5. Environmental Information
Atmel Environmental Policy:
Atmel is committed to providing a safe and healthy workplace and complying with all environmental
regulations.
Essential Elements
Our environmental, health and safety goals are to prevent incidents that:
Cause injury to our employees and visitors
Harm the environment
Cause property loss, and/or
Result in business interruption
Our goals also include a commitment to comply with environmental, health, and safety regulations, as
well as a commitment to protect our human and natural resources.
We believe that all accidents and undesirable environmental incidents are preventable. Furthermore,
there is no job which should become so routine, or so urgent that it cannot be done safely and/or in an
environmentally sound manner.
Realization of these goals and objectives demand the support of every employee, at every level of the
organization. Atmel employees must embrace this policy with the same spirit, commitment of resources,
and intelligence, as we embrace customer satisfaction, product quality, and continuous improvement.
As part of this corporate policy, Ozone Depleting Chemicals are being replaced either by Atmel Nantes
or its sub-contractors. In addition the factory is committed in:
- Reducing the use of harmful chemicals in its processes
- Reducing the content of harmful materials in its products
- Using recyclable materials wherever possible
- Reducing the energy content of its products
Atmel Nantes is ISO14001 certified since May 2000.
20
Rev. 2 – Jan 2002
MH1RT QualPack
6. Other Data
6.1 ISO9001 and QS900 Certificates
Rev.2 – Jan. 2002
21
MH1RT QualPack
6.2 Data Book Reference
The data sheet is available upon request to sales representative or in Atmel site:
http://www.atmel.com/
Data sheet:
MH1RT 1.6M used gate Sea of Gates Rad Tolerant
Address References
All inquiries relating to this document should be addressed to the following:
Atmel Nantes
BP70602
44306 Nantes Cedex 3
France
Telephone (33) 2 40 18 18 18
Telefax
(33) 2 40 18 19 00
Or Direct contact
Pascal LECUYER
Product Assurance Manager
Telephone (33) 2 40 18 17 73
Telefax
(33) 2 40 18 19 00
Remarks:
The information given in this document is believed to be accurate and reliable. However, no
responsibility is assumed by Atmel Nantes S.A. for its use. No specific guarantee or warranty is implied
or given by this data unless agreed in writing elsewhere.
Atmel Nantes S.A. reserves the right to update or modify this information without notification, at any time,
in the interest of providing the latest information.
Parts of this publication may be reproduced without special permission on the condition that our author
and source are quoted and that two copies of such extracts are placed at our disposal after publication.
Before use of such reproduced material the user should check that the information is current.
Written permission must be obtained from the publisher for complete reprints or translations.
22
Rev. 2 – Jan 2002